Add a Comment See all 40 Comments
by cbsespo January 30, 2008 8:42 PM EST
I think that Barack has been tested
plenty. The debate and discussions that went on at Harvard Law were sometimes brutal and controversial.
This article gives us a glimpse of what he was like as a young man.
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/us/politics/20070128_OBAMA.html
Reply to this comment
by dan9111 January 30, 2008 8:37 PM EST
Interestingly Edwards was perhaps the least violent of the Democrats. Only Ron Paul really wants to let us decide how to spend our money (even that is debatable). Without principle, there is no reason to support any of these crooks. So don''t bother voting.

When you vote pro-war (or pro-tax) you are standing in blood. If you don''t care, then you should all shout "Go Hillary!" I can''t wait to see her take all the heat.
Reply to this comment
by fromny12526 January 30, 2008 8:35 PM EST
I was going to vote for John Edwards on Feb. fifth. I was voting for him, not because of his voting record, because it didn''t backup his message, but because I felt as though he was being sincere. He wanted to see America change. Hillary Clinton keeps talking about her experience but that''s not enough. She''s old news. I can''t send a message to the rest of the world that reads Bush Clinton Bush Clinton. This is a democracy. A lot of people talk about Obama not having enough "experience". He has just as much as Hillary he just didn''t care on about it. Remember, she was the first lady not the president.
I am a 45 year old white male and my wife is a 46 year old white female. We will be proudly voting for Obama. Thanks for listening.
Reply to this comment
by fromny12526 January 30, 2008 8:32 PM EST
I was going to vote for John Edwards on Feb. fifth. I was voting for him, not because of his voting record, because it didn''t backup his message, but because I felt as though he was being sincere. He wanted to see America change. Hillary Clinton keeps talking about her experience but that''s not enough. She''s old news. I can''t send a message to the rest of the world that reads Bush Clinton Bush Clinton. This is a democracy. A lot of people talk about Obama not having enough "experience". He has just as much as Hillary he just didn''t care on about it. Remember, she was the first lady not the president.
I am a 45 year old white male and my wife is a 46 year old white female. We will be proudly voting for Obama. Thanks for listening.
Reply to this comment
by destardi January 30, 2008 8:32 PM EST
HILLARY ''08!

After Obama race baited the last few weeks, I will not vote for him.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200801130004

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/12/obama-camps-memo-on-clin_n_81205.html


Obama''s pulling a Karl Rove...because people are so easily fooled with soundbytes; peopel spouting off without knowing what was actually said..Clinton haters step off!
Reply to this comment
by byeneocons January 30, 2008 8:22 PM EST
I will vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is. Voted for Bush, then Kerry, now whoever.

The Republican party has been fractured by all the neocon nutjobs and pseudoevangelistas.
Reply to this comment
by davek455 January 30, 2008 8:19 PM EST
I was an Edwards voter. I am now switching to Hillary. 44 year old white male. I like Obama. Will vote for him in November if he''s on the ticket, but I want someone battle hardened. Not someone tagged by the Republicans as ultra-liberal Ted Kennedy-style former cocaine user with ties to Muslim terror groups in Africa. I can promise you the Republicans will have their supporters put those fears out there to defeat Obama.
Reply to this comment
by georgiagrl1 January 30, 2008 8:16 PM EST
QUOTE: "LOL! Edwards leaves and the same day Ralph Nader announces. The split in the democrat party just got wider."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by trapbreak at 04:15 PM : Jan 30, 2008

*GeorgiaGrl1 ponders to herself, "and what has Nadar done for us lately?"*
Reply to this comment
by clovisbuford January 30, 2008 8:11 PM EST
"Under bridges and on grates. They also go to the trail park residents that live across from his 30,000 square foot house" mudrose
Hmmm John Edwards speaking up for homeless vets ,makes him unqualified to have earned enough money to live the way he wants?Romney is worth more, hillary and Bill almost as much, John Edewards speaking up for the middle classs is a bad thing because he made a success of himself and wanted it for more middle class americans? not sure I get the logic mudrose ,go vote republican its easier than thinking.
Reply to this comment
by bgreen415 January 30, 2008 8:08 PM EST
I was definitely an Edwards supporter. My vote will go to Obama. I am a 53 year old WASP.
Reply to this comment
See all 40 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn