Comments on: Clinton Chair McAuliffe "Looking Forward"

Campaign Chair Says Votes In Florida And Michigan Should Be Counted

[sjbj2322]

Awww Yes - Senator Obama''s ethics, wisdom and judgement. Read this speech and then tell me about ethics, wisdom or judgement. He has all the ethics of a toad, enough wisdom to assume that his audience will be too stupid to question the plausibility that he might be lying to them in an effort to gain their support, and judgement - well I didn''t fall for it. Now you be the judge. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/saywhat.asp

[deannattu]

No one has doubts about the experience which Hillary will bring to the White House since she was the wife of Bill Clinton who had varied expertise both in intern al and external affairs. What America needs is a President to face unknown situations in this ever changing world to make history and not a President to turn the pages of lifetime history of experince. Obama is indeed the Change.

[oscarever]

I don''t understand why it is when 80 to 90 % of african american voters vote for obama, it is not considered racism. Do they really think his policies are best??
I think he is a good democrat, but this sure seems to quack like a duck.

[grazinggoat]

CBSNews.com: But you''re chairman of the campaign. Do you worry that so many of your aides seem to be pointing daggers? And the daggers are almost all pointing at your chief strategist, Mark Penn.

-Thanks CBS News.com for asking this question. If it''s not revolt, what should this be called? Unsubordination for street people not to understand what it means?

[grazinggoat]

Why are Libs reuluctant to discuss that editorial columns in Arab newspapers around the world are endorsing Barack?

*H*U*S*S*E*I*N
Posted by T-racyMorgan at 01:34 PM : Mar 08, 2008

-TrashyMorgan, Since you seem to read Arabic, why don''t YOU tell us?

[laurenbrillante]

I almost vomited yesterday when I watched the video of the staged media event with Hillary and the retired generals yesterday. The generals read from scripts and she praised John McCain, claimed to have experience that she doesn''t have and then claim that she had ''met the threshhold and proven that she is ready to be commander and chief''....she is delusional... Seems to me she keeps putting out what she wants us to believe as if she is trying to use mind control or the power of suggestion to make something a reality. I have gone beyond losing all respect for her.

Having her on any ticket will unite the fractured republican party and they will do everything to keep the Clintons out of the white house.

I am grateful for Senator Obama''s ethics, wisdom, and judgement. I would love to see an Obama/Edwards ticket in the fall. I think they would work well together to bring much needed change in Washington.

Obama/Edwards 08'' Yes We Can!

[realpatriot1]

herfan,

You might be an idiot if you think 35 years of making bad decisions prepares someone to finally begin making the right decisions.

She spent most of the 35 years working for a corporate law firm. Being First Lady of Arkansas isn''t preparation either.

What you all are really pointing to is her 8 years in the White House when she mismanaged the fight for heathcare reform and created undue drama by attempting to fire public employees at the White House travel office and pilfering the FBI files of private citizens who happened to be her political opponents.

The woman gives an entirely new meaning to the term ethically challenged.

She does have one bit of truly unique experience; she''s the only U.S. Senator to be cited for filing false financial disclosures 5 times and her maiden Senate Campaign was the subject of the largest campaign finance fraud case ever brought by the Federal Elections Commission.

It makes one wonder exactly what she''s ready for on Day 1.

[pepperwood2]

YOU MIGHT BE AN IDIOT:-)

If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.

With all due respect Man - M''am A spin, scheme, or gimmick is made up to temporarily confuse or mislead a potential voter usually released just before an election. If the voter takes it in hook, line & sinker and it achieves the affect or result that the Candidate is looking for, it will be used over & over again until joe six pack realizes that he''s been lied to, manipulated, & mislead into believing.

You''ll soon discover that Bill was a Lowly Governor of a corrupt administration in the State of Arkansas. That was the extend of his resume. He was able with the right band of PR, Press, & Spin to get The People convinced to vote for him.

No he had no prior experience compared to Hillary phoney Spin resume. The real truth is that in the 35 years that she keeps spinning she''s only an authority on how to run a corrupt administration in Arkansas & Washington. What you see is what Mr. & Mrs. America will get from the Clintons.

The Facts are such. Don''t take my word for it. You seem like a very intelligent person. Don''t be an idiot:-)

If you think Barack Obama with little or no experience would be better than Hillary Clinton with 35 years experience.

You Might Be An Idiot!
Posted by herfan
-------
Just exactly what 35 years experience might you be talkin''about??

[gkc99]

"CBSNews.com: So you''re ruling out the Clinton campaign ever supporting a revote?
Terry McAuliffe: I''m saying they''ve already voted, let''s count the votes. I%u2019m saying that the state parties in those states need to work with the national party and figure out how we count the votes that have already been voted. "



Sounds like the Clintonistas are every bit as contemptuous of laws they don''t like as the Bushits.

The primaries in Mi and FL were held full well knowing that delegates wouldn''t be counted.

Clinton had no problem with that.

Now Clinton opposes a fair vote in those two states to correct the problem. Any slimy tactic is OK with Clinton if she wins.

And if she is nominated on this basis, independents will either not vote, or will leave the Dem party in droves.

Think, Clinton, think! Is your victory really worth destroying the Democratic party for?