Comments on: Newt for President?

CBS News' Brian Goldsmith Interviews Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich

Add a Comment See all 77 Comments
by infidel_us July 20, 2007 4:38 PM EDT
"Diapers and politicians need to be changed regularly....and for the same reason!"
Posted by tibu987 at 01:13 PM : Jul 20, 2007

Well said...and I agree 100%.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 July 20, 2007 4:22 PM EDT
Never never going to happen, 52 percent of the electorate is women and they don%u2019t take kindly to philandering men who divorce wives on the hospital bed with the girlfriend and next wife waiting in the car and that is not even mentioning every other unflattering thing about this man. Let me re think this just like the right funding Nadir, sure Newt for President and excellent strategy just do not count on the vote suppression by the DOJ happening this time righties.
Reply to this comment
by tibu987 July 20, 2007 4:13 PM EDT
Gimmee a break,
Newt Gingrich is precisely the type of political bottom feeder that we do not need in Washington, there are already too many like him in office.
What needs to be done is to vote for term limits and get all the old goats out of office. There are so many in Washington that have been there so long, playing the game, but doing little for the country, feeding at the trough.
Gingrich personifies all that is wrong in Washington.
I am an old goat and I would like to see young idealistic young man and women in office and then out of office in two terms before they become corrupted with power and money.

"Diapers and politicians need to be changed regularly....and for the same reason!"
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood July 20, 2007 3:42 PM EDT
Newt for president?

Thanks, but...ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR COTTON-PICKIN MIND?
Reply to this comment
by bananaamy July 20, 2007 3:33 PM EDT
newt for pres? uhhhhhhh no!
Reply to this comment
by cantshutup July 20, 2007 3:30 PM EDT
just when i think republipukes can't get any crazier...
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 20, 2007 3:28 PM EDT
You are weird. the opposite of Neo-con--would be old con. LOL.

sorry, meant to spell it out for you.
Neo con--means "neo conservative" neo means new, ergo; neo-con= new conservative. The opposite of a new conservative would be an old conservative. Meaning one that did not spout the new ideology of the neo con--which is to use force to effect change to create/exploit similar status quo to the one they enjoy in America. (them on top,paying few taxes while using others to make money and not caring about anything or anyone but themselves) But ...since the old conservatives fail to exstinguish or disassociate from the neo cons in their bids to retain power--the 2 are essentially the same.

The neo con is okay with killing to further their own pockets or agenda. and the old conservative is okay with the neo con killing if it means they can finally be/stay in power.


The fact that so many are jumping ship, indicates NOT that they disagree of what the neo cons did or are doing--but the old conservative is a true pimp--they never stay with a prostitute that can no longer ensure a profit. They disassociate and become Democrats thinking to briefly ride that particular political whorrrre to power. And being true political whorrrres (like the neo cons) the Democrats gladly accept the defections--evil and all--into their fold. They should tell them they don't want them--but Dems have never been big on principle. rolling over and into anything to win is their forte.
Reply to this comment
by jdubs63 July 20, 2007 3:20 PM EDT
oh pleazzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzze
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 20, 2007 3:15 PM EDT
RESPONSE TO TOLDYOU SO: Even in Europe, people want to know if I know any "neo Cons" personally and they ask if you are all latent Nazis. Posted by toldyouso21 SO DOES THIS MEAN THAT IF ONE IS NOT A NEOCON, ONE IS A CON. Posted by doctorwho4 at 12:04 PM : Jul 20, 2007


You are weird. the opposite of Neo-con--would be old con. LOL.

But as an Independent, I am prone to bash both sides with aplomb. The difference is I can live with the weaknesses or indecisions of most democrats and I can even (barely) swallow some of their pathetic stances on social issues--but I detest, despise and vehemently denounce the behavior/antics and mindsets of neo cons--from illegal invasions, to the lies and hypocrisy, to the rampant sexual actions, to the fake Christianity, to the war mongering and torture loving, and meglomaniacal self interest

As for extremists--"every action elicits an equal and opposite reaction" I hazard the guess that if there were no neo cons, there would be no terrorists. Because terrorism is a natural reaction to the lies, exploitation, propped up regimes and oppression of neo-conesque behavior on other countries. We keep thinking we can kill off people reacting to our fvcked up policies, but we never go to the real source of the problem: ideologies that create such inequities that it GROWS and cultures such extremes.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales July 20, 2007 3:14 PM EDT
A deer got over my garden fence the other day and left a pile on the path...it's sitting there drawing flies much like one of the mainstream Democratic or Republican presidential possibilities with which the MSM is all abuzz...

Newt Gingrich does not have the character of that pile left by the doe. His supporters, just like the supporters of Thompson, Giulliani, McCain, Romney, Clinton, Edwards and Obama aren't picky, however,...It is their nature...they buzz about any and all the droppings that the MSM leaves on their plates... Well, mainstream America...you've munched on Bush and Clinton droppings, sampled the leavings of Gore, Dole and Kerry...You have a real appetite for it... and the 2008 election will provide you with a veritable feast! Eat Up!
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 20, 2007 3:05 PM EDT
The logic is good. People start running for Pres way too early. This is likely the best historian and original thinker in the US. I do not think he will run for President. Good man with a hot rod with excessive testosterone like Bill Clinton, only has not had to use force to get female attention like most of the readers of this column.
Posted by doctorwho4 at 11:58 AM : Jul 20, 2007


He is a LIAR and a MEGLOMANIAC. Most Americans can live with the former--we have Bush and his regime to see what living with the BOTH attributes is like. No thank you. No more Republicans for a while--there is something very wrong with the thinking and spiritual processes of many in that party. As for using force on women--that is funny. Too much testosterone? That is not Newt's problem. His and most Neo cons suffer from wishing to rule the world and make as much money any way they can. PERVERSION is their credo. Whether it is the perversion of having *** outside of their marriages with males and females and claiming a halo or perverting our government to make it a dictatorship or perverting our law to make it a kangaroo system....it seems to be right up the Republican alley. And since I am a heterosexual woman, I do not use force to get *** from anyone--nice try.

Besides, the man has pig eyes. Never trust a man with pig eyes. (Bush has pig eyes too) small, beady, greedy, mean, viscious and venal eyes--mirror to their souls.
Reply to this comment
by SIDNEYWILLIAMSMD July 20, 2007 3:04 PM EDT
RESPONSE TO TOLDYOU SO: Even in Europe, people want to know if I know any "neo Cons" personally and they ask if you are all latent Nazis. Posted by toldyouso21 SO DOES THIS MEAN THAT IF ONE IS NOT A NEOCON, ONE IS A CON. SO ANOTHER TERM FOR LIB IS CON, OR A SPIN ON THAT WOULD BE LIBCON, OR CONLIB. WHAT IF YOU ARE TRANSEXUAL MUTANT HOMOPHOBE? OR A TRANSGENDER CROSSDRESSER? Would these generally be neocons, cons, libcons, conlibs, or bilinguals?
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 20, 2007 2:59 PM EDT
Even in Europe, people want to know if I know any "neo Cons" personally and they ask if you are all latent Nazis. Posted by toldyouso21 at 11:55 AM : Jul 20, 2007

I tell them, that except for very few exceptions, the ones I know ----would have made great Nazis.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 July 20, 2007 2:59 PM EDT
Ah, honey before you puke from the last batch of chemo can you sign the divorce papers hear my girlfriend is parked illegally at the emergency entrance........please these rightist really hate their women, Rudys 3rd wife was evicted by a judge from the home he shared with the second wife and kids, and how about the brothel visiting chairman of Rudys campaign Vitter with 4 children and a wife out spending the milk money on hookers, and not least that baby that Thompson is married to typical Hollywood type,....sleezyyyyy not my God not my family values my religious leader would have a problem if I associated myself with these people let alone voted for one, that family values line is a sound bite and look al the leaders the supposed religious leaders that support them, Ted buy same *** *** and cocaine form a hooker, Jerry Falwell vicious divisive politician in religious drag and that murder other world leader nut Robinson false Christians is my charge.
Reply to this comment
by SIDNEYWILLIAMSMD July 20, 2007 2:58 PM EDT
The logic is good. People start running for Pres way too early. This is likely the best historian and original thinker in the US. I do not think he will run for President. Good man with a hot rod with excessive testosterone like Bill Clinton, only has not had to use force to get female attention like most of the readers of this column.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 20, 2007 2:55 PM EDT
And a Neo-Con just like you - Infidel in GA
Posted by parrot2 at 11:13 AM : Jul 20, 2007

Now that wasn't nice, WAS it? What would Mrs. Edwards say about your nasty leftwing 'hate speech'? I think should would disapprove of you, as do I. Posted by infidel_us at 11:20 AM : Jul 20, 2007

Why is calling you a neo con a bad word? Wasn't okay in the 2001-2004 build up to invasion and war? When did neo cons shirk or cringe from their own title? They gave it to themselves now you say to call you one is hate speech?

So Neo Con is the new and horrific "N" word that must not be said? I'm sorry to say, that when most people hear or see ANY/MOST Republicans, true or not---they think NEO-CON, blood thirsty, war mongering, torture loving, ill bred, anti-intellectual, back wards, self centered, evil, Nazi-esque, neo con. and the filth of that name was a result of the actions, mindset and results of neo cons.

As for Edward's wife, I don't care what she says, because I am an Independent. Neo Con IS an ugly expression---but...it is one that those who wear and share that name created and paraded in for themselves. It is synonymous with the term Nazi--no matter what the right says about slander. Neo cons will be known as the Nazi's of the 21st century. Everyone around the world knows this. Even in Europe, people want to know if I know any "neo Cons" personally and they ask if you are all latent Nazis.
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us July 20, 2007 2:47 PM EDT
No wonder the "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND" program is such a success!
Posted by ozilot at 11:44 AM : Jul 20, 2007

Yeah, guess Harvard and Kennedy suck too, huh? :)
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 July 20, 2007 2:46 PM EDT
Newt can't win. Simply put:

1. His hypocrisy during the Clinton witch hunt will make many on the Religious right and ordinary conservatives shun him

2. His zeal and hypocrisy during the Clinton witch hunt makes him a total turn off by the majority of Americans--since the majority are Democrats and Independents

Even if every single Republican could and did nominate him (just as is true for the other Republican candidates) without cheating machines or an interfering SCOTUS, the MAJORITY would still not vote for him due to him:

A. Being a lying hypocrite

B. Being a lying, vindictive hypocrite

C -Z. Being a Republican

We've had enough thank you. We know that the media wants to make Republicans stay relevant to foster real competition. but the truth is, the majority do not want them. Bush and his and the GOP's antics for the past 7 years--have turned Americans off for a long, long time. The rout is coming, no amount of attack adds and comments by the GOP can change the KNOWN and EXPERIENCED reality of the past 7 years. FACT.

Reply to this comment
by macusweil July 20, 2007 2:26 PM EDT
Can we impeach him before he's elected for vast hypocrisy?

GOP family values = don't get caught!!
Reply to this comment
by lawandorder7 July 20, 2007 2:25 PM EDT
I can't belive any one would ask this S^^&&**(*()O ))(*&^%^(*& salkj any thing. He is a no good crook. Put his name on this site is pksdjfod s3498734560987
Reply to this comment
See all 77 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (466 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: