Comments on: N.H. Polls: What Went Wrong?
CBS' Kathy Frankovic: Some Theories About Bad N.H. Polls Don't Hold Water
Add a Comment See all 59 Comments
- Why are people making such a big thing out of this. It was a topsy-turvey race. Clinton had as much as a 12 point lead 10 days prior and then it swung to a 10 point Obama lead. That, along with a very large turnout resulted in a 3% margin of victory. Regardless of who won, that should not be a large surprise.
Posted by craigh9 at 02:42 PM : Jan 14, 20
They want to beat her here so the republicans might be able to beat the other nominee in the nationals - Reply to this comment
- This is there way to get back at Bill CLINTON THEY ARE TAKING ALL HE DONE OUT ON HER, AND IT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO HAPPEN, SHE HAS DONE NOTHING TO DESERVE THIS LYNCHING SHE IS GETTING . THEY KNOW HILLARY ELECTED BILL WILL BE THERE AS WELL
- Reply to this comment
- Never underestimate the Clinton crime family in stealing
vote for Hitlery. She is power hungry.
Posted by tylenol6
The voters should decide who they want and just vote we do not need all this coaching and tabloid lies so we will vote there way - Reply to this comment
- the result in NH, I believe was media backlash. Why is the media so opposed to the Clinton''s? Hillary has been under scrutiny for months while Obama is yet to be vetted. No one is asking the tough questions of him. He received a pass by the questioners of the debates and so far by the main stream media. Why?
- Reply to this comment
- Actually the mainstream media is strongly pulling for Hillary Clinton. I think they feel, probably rightly so, that they can swiftboat her like the conservatives did last election to Kerry.
Note the unholy connection between Karl Rove and Hillary, Rupert Murdoch and Hillary and Wal Mart, all extremist right wing influences. - Reply to this comment
- The Main stream media "polls" are creations of CBS''''s desire to see Obama elected. They blame their disastrous polling results on the voter. Here''''s a clue, the voter is never wrong.
Posted by mbcsmith at 03:48 PM : Jan 14, 20
You got that right, the media was trying to brainwash the voter against Hillary and the voter outwitted the tabloid media way to go New Hampshire listening to the media I thought for sure 11 point lead was way out there but didn''t know as I said listening to the media - Reply to this comment
- The Main stream media "polls" are creations of CBS''s desire to see Obama elected. They blame their disastrous polling results on the voter. Here''s a clue, the voter is never wrong.
- Reply to this comment
- Never underestimate the Clinton crime family in stealing
vote for Hitlery. She is power hungry. - Reply to this comment
- Why are people making such a big thing out of this. It was a topsy-turvey race. Clinton had as much as a 12 point lead 10 days prior and then it swung to a 10 point Obama lead. That, along with a very large turnout resulted in a 3% margin of victory. Regardless of who won, that should not be a large surprise.
- Reply to this comment
- Nothing went wrong - the Commentators (not Journalists) voiced personal feeling about the race (like they are ever correct) from FOX news and did not perform REAL polling of the voters.
The Orwellian News services tried to push who they thought should win or wanted to win. This will become even more evident in the coming months.
For REAL news - go to the Blogs! - Reply to this comment
- Two theories?! That''s all you could come up with? Ask a statistician and he/she would tell you there are a dozen theories -- the most interesting of which is the possibility of voter fraud. Why does mainstream media brush this possibility aside? We''ll find out if this is the reason as soon as NH election official finish the recount.
BTW - I seriously doubt the Wilder effect (the race theory) was the reason because NH has a semi-open primary where one could choose from dozens of candidates. - Reply to this comment
- I love it when the polls show something people like they don''t have a problem with them when they show something they don''t like or the results come out differently they have a problem. While most polls are correct today the swing voter is swinging very rapidly because it is a day to day thing. I can be certain that if you were to vote do you think that the administration is doing a good job or not the not would be on target.
But like anything last minute can change everything. - Reply to this comment
- Electoral fraud is what went wrong in New Hampshire...
blackboxvoting.org - Reply to this comment
- Two theories?! That''s all you could come up with? Ask a statistician and he/she would tell you there are a dozen theories -- the most interesting of which is the possibility of voter fraud. Why does mainstream media brush this possibility aside? We''ll find out if this is the reason as soon as NH election official finish the recount.
BTW - I seriously doubt the Wilder effect (the race theory) was the reason because NH has a semi-open primary where one could choose from dozens of candidates. - Reply to this comment
- Two theories?! That''s all you could come up with? Ask a statistician and he/she would tell you there are a dozen theories -- the most interesting of which is the possibility of voter fraud. Why does mainstream media brush this possibility aside? We''ll find out if this is the reason as soon as NH election official finish the recount.
BTW - I seriously doubt the Wilder effect (the race theory) was the reason because NH has a semi-open primary where one could choose from dozens of candidates. - Reply to this comment
- Two theories?! That''s all you could come up with? Ask a statistician and he/she would tell you there are a dozen theories -- the most interesting of which is the possibility of voter fraud. Why does mainstream media brush this possibility aside? We''ll find out if this is the reason as soon as NH election official finish the recount.
BTW - I seriously doubt the Wilder effect (the race theory) was the reason because NH has a semi-open primary where one could choose from dozens of candidates. - Reply to this comment
- Two theories?! That''s all you could come up with? Ask a statistician and he/she would tell you there are a dozen theories -- the most interesting of which is the possibility of voter fraud. Why does mainstream media brush this possibility aside? We''ll find out if this is the reason as soon as NH election official finish the recount.
BTW - I seriously doubt the Wilder effect (the race theory) was the reason because NH has a semi-open primary where one could choose from dozens of candidates. - Reply to this comment
- What went wrong? HA
What went wrong was the media trying to manipulate the peoples desires and finding it didn''t work!! - Reply to this comment
- "The Democratic campaign is not racially polarizing now,"
HA!!!!
...right... - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
