Comments on: Candidates On Equal Footing In Indiana
Politico: Close Race Expected As Hoosier State's Demographics Benefit Both Obama And Clinton
Add a Comment See all 35 Comments
- hmmmmmm.......wonder what the Super Delegates would have to say about this article
"Open Letter to the Super Delegates" http://savagepolitics.com/?p=311 - Reply to this comment
- If Hillary is the best candidate, has the best policies, has the best campaign, comes from a political dynasty, loves America most, identifies most with voters, has the most experience, has a president campaigning for her, is most honest and is most likely to win against McCain THEN WHY IS SHE TRAILING BEHIND OBAMA IN THE RACE !!!!
Hillary supporters have their heads in the sand and their fingers in their ears and simply keep repeating that superdelegates can save her because of electability.
But the superdelegates clearly see that her electability is poor. Why? Because they know that if she cant even beat an inexperienced, elitist, america hating, no good newcomer like Obama then she will be useless to the Democrats in november.
She only has a small lead in superdelegates because they jumped on board with her last year before real campaigning had begun and when everyone automatically assumed she would win the nomination.
So, her POOR ELECTABILITY, explains why Obama has gained a massive advantage in superdelegates since super tuesday compared to duck hunting, pistol packing, sniper dodging Hillary. And its her poor electability that completely deflates the superdelegate argument of the hanging by the fingernail Hillary supporters.
Go home Hillary and take your pant suits with you. - Reply to this comment
- WHY CAN''T HILLARY CLOSE THE DEAL?
PA was Clinton''s to lose.
Hillary enjoyed a 16 year name advantage, family roots, to her own credit 35 yrs of experience, decades of political favors and friends to call on.
Why is Hillary losing more states than Obama
Why is Hillary behind in pledged delegates?
Why is Hillary only 24 superdelegates ahead?
Why is the Clinton machine/Hillary millions in debt?
Why didn''t Hillary knock Obama out on Super Tuesday?
Why didn''t Hillary win her birth state of Illinois?
WHY CAN''T HILLARY CLOSE THE DEAL W/ 35 YRS OF EXPERIENCE, A MACHINE, POLITICAL CONNECTIONS, AND A PRESIDENT BEHIND HER?
WHY CANT SHE BEAT AN INEXPERIENCED, AMERICA HATING NO GOOD NEWCOMER ??
Because Obama is the best candidate, who is running the best campaign, who is running on the issues, who is breaking finance records, who is bringing the young and new voters to the democratic party? - Reply to this comment
- Both candidates agreed to the rules regarding Mi and Fl.
Hillary is behaving like a spoilt child, she AGREES to the rules and then when she is losing and she cant see any way out, she starts crying and getting hysterical, insisting that the rules be changed so she can win !!! She needs to be in kindergarten not on the political arena.
She reminds me of Bush. She simply lowers the bar for victory when she lost by the earlier definition. - Reply to this comment
- Obama supporters don''t seem to get it. They say the math is in his favor, but the math says neither candidate will get the 2025 delegates to win the Dems nomination. That leaves the superdels to decide it and they are under **no** obligation to vote either way. They get to use independent judgment just like the rest of us. Those are the rules and that''s the fact.
- Reply to this comment
- Hillary is now ahead in the popular vote--and that lead will increase---
she is even more ahead if you discount the essentially undemocratic caucuses where there was no right to a secret and free ballot--in the caucus states aggressive individuals were able to pressure family and friends to drink the Obama Kool-Aid.
Especially women voters are susceptible to be victims of this kind of pressure--so naturally, this hurt Hillary Clinton. - Reply to this comment
- Hillary-Steinem ''''08?
Wonder who these broads would tap as Secretary of Defense, Jane Fonda?
Posted by BLKPRESIDENT
***
Do women in charge frighten you? - Reply to this comment
- I think the 10 million Hillary raised in the day after her PA win will put a big dent in the debt her campaign owes, so I don''t think that''s much of an issue at this point. That sort of one-day gain speaks volumes about her supporters and their commitment to keep her in the race.
- Reply to this comment
- "This is like Barry Obama not knowing what his preacher preached over the past 20 years. What a liar"
Posted by LibH8er
Barakh Hussein Ubama may not remember exactly what his preacher said 20 years ago, but by his own words he admits crying profusely since Jeremiah Wright''s words touched him so. Now he wants to appear to not want to touch his former dear friend with a 10-foot pole. Obama is a fraud and a charlatan.
He also, by the way, can''t remember what friend and slumlord (now under indictment by the FBI) Antoin Rezko told him in a conversation just a year ago.
At his age, what a shame he already has Alzheimer''s! - Reply to this comment
- The Clinton campaign has spent about $163 million, and Obama''s campaign has spent more than $189 million. Both candidates, however, have debt. Obama owes about $660,000, and Clinton is in the red by about $10 million.
"We can only keep winning if we can keep competing with an opponent who outspends us so massively," she said in her victory speech Tuesday.
A little over 20 million separates the two of them in an almost 200 million battle, yet Hillary states she is being "massively outspent". Guess the numbers show Hillary stretching the truth a bit (again)....
What is far more interesting is the remaining debt - Obama with a little over 1/2 million while Clinton owes 10 million!! One campaign is a full of strife and debt while the other is a well run machine.
I want a President who will tackle the debt problem, not run it up with bad spending choices! Vote for Obama! - Reply to this comment
- Hillary-Steinem ''08?
Wonder who these broads would tap as Secretary of Defense, Jane Fonda? - Reply to this comment
- ''In an interview yesterday, Hillary -- whose connection to President Clinton''s 2001 sentence commutations for two members of the Weather Underground has become an issue since she tried to raise questions about Obama''s acquaintance with another ex-Weatherman -- told "Inside Edition" that she "didn''t know anything about" the 2001 clemency case''
This is like Barry Obama not knowing what his preacher preached over the past 20 years. What a liar!!! - Reply to this comment
McBush 2008! Four more wars!
lol!- Reply to this comment
- EQUALLY PROJECTED TO LOSE WHERE IT MATTERS THE MOST- TRUTH BE TOLD- THEIR BEHAVIOUR IS DISGUSTING- THE CANDIDATES ARE NOT QUALIFIED AND THEY HAVE THE BIGGEST EGOS ON EARTH. THE DUMB FOLKS JUST DON''T SEE IT- MCCAIN 2008
- Reply to this comment
- EQUALLY PROJECTED TO LOSE WHERE IT MATTERS THE MOST- TRUTH BE TOLD- THEIR BEHAVIOUR IS DISGUSTING- THE CNADIDATES ARE NOT QUALIFIED AND THEY HAVE THE BIGGEST EGOS ON EARTH. THE DUMB FOLKS JUST DON''T SEE IT- MUST TELL YA SOMETHING!
- Reply to this comment
