Comments on: What Clinton Wishes She Could Say

Politico: Candidate Won't Say Publicly What She Says In Private About Obama

Add a Comment See all 321 Comments
by ranger1948 April 15, 2008 2:19 PM EDT
writescripts
I could go for Powell but i never trusted or liked rice either. Why cant the political parties find someone who is worthy of leading our country ?
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 April 15, 2008 2:15 PM EDT
If hillary were the most worthless person, the biggest *** in the world, i wouold still vot for her over obama.
Reply to this comment
by peteracevedo-2009 April 15, 2008 2:11 PM EDT
Check out the article %u201CJerry Smith and Messiah College%u201D http://savagepolitics.com/?p=285
and %u201CBack Room Deals%u201D http://savagepolitics.com/?p=279


http://www.savagepolitics.com
Their articles are like nothing I have read in any of the current media outlets. It is brilliant writing plus it offers a great community in which to discuss. The editor actually takes time to answer and the political humor section is awesome!!!
Reply to this comment
by jockh April 15, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
Sen. Clinton has run an incompetent campaign, half truths, outright lies, imaginary flights, take-no prisoners politics, a presidential spouse given to wallowing in anger and self-pity, and a succession of aides and surrogates pushed under the bus when things don%u2019t go right. Her campaign has failed spectacularly despite being the Partys obvious favorite from the beginning.

She cannot win the pledged delegates so she is simply hanging around with a begging bowl asking for the nomination in case Obama makes a fatal mistake.

What kind of a leader would prefer to win a Presidential Election on account of her opponents mistakes. How can Sen. Clinton manage the United States when she can%u2019t even run her own campaign.
Reply to this comment
by jgunther7 April 15, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
Hillary Clinton is the founder and chairman of the Senate India Caucus. One of her biggest donors, Sant Singh Chatwal, cited that Clinton%u2019s India Caucus has vowed to raise $5 million dollars for her from companies that outsource American Jobs to India.

In the Febuary 2005 issue of The India Review / On a recent trip to India, Senator Clinton laid to rest India%u2019s fears that outsourcing American jobs would end. On that trip Senator Clinton said %u201COUTSOURCING of AMERICAN Jobs will continue%u201D

The people of Pennsylvania have supported Clinton and she has outsourced their jobs. The people of Pennsylvania vote for her and she rewards India. Somebody is being conned. She diverts our attention with little hissy fits about trevia while her husband Bill and manager Penn are carrying bags of money out the back door.
Reply to this comment
by obama8years April 15, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
cbsnews.com/stories/2008/04/11/ opinion/main4009369.shtml

or click on opinion and then the "bad barack"

Put down your Coffee and read the above CBS article
"Bad Obama" OBAMA is Finished when CBS decides to let it Jounalists write the truth.
Reply to this comment
by johnstossel April 15, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
Here''s what Hillary should say: "My ancestors in Arkansas used to own a bunch of you people. Now you want to be President? How ungrateful
Reply to this comment
by shetmanhilry April 15, 2008 12:37 PM EDT
What Clinton Wishes She Could Say
-
HERE IS MY VICE PRESIDENT RUNNING MATE

http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2008/04/14/image4013904.jpg
Reply to this comment
by jockh April 15, 2008 12:28 PM EDT
As a gun owner and hunter, I have trouble welcoming Hillary Clinton into the gun fraternity.

And, as someone who used to toss down more than his share of shots, I have even more trouble imagining an evening at the local bar tossing back shots and beer with the Democratic Presidential pretender.

Yet claims of a hunting heritage and downing shots of Crown Royal and chasing it with a beer is part of Clinton''s pathetic attempt to prove she''s just one of us.

Memo to Hillary: You ain''t one of us, especially with 109 million dollars in the pockets of your solid gold pant suits; so drop the charade, you are looking like a fool. We''re not looking for one of us. We''re looking for a leader.

Besides, if the phone rings at the White House at 3 a.m. and the Hillary is spreadeagled across the bed, passed out in an alcohol-induced stupor, no one is available to answer the phone.
Reply to this comment
by taotxzen April 15, 2008 12:22 PM EDT
Here is enough justification to vote for the guy:

Obama Would "Immediately Review" Potential Of Crimes In Bush White House

April 15, 2008


Attytood''s Will Bunch has a new interview with Barack Obama:
Tonight I had an opportunity to ask Barack Obama a question that is on the minds of many Americans, yet rarely rises to the surface in the great ruckus of the 2008 presidential race -- and that is whether an Obama administration would seek to prosecute officials of a former Bush administration on the revelations that they greenlighted torture, or for other potential crimes that took place in the White House.

%u2028Obama said that as president he would indeed ask his new Attorney General and his deputies to "immediately review the information that''s already there" and determine if an inquiry is warranted -- but he also tread carefully on the issue, in line with his reputation for seeking to bridge the partisan divide. He worried that such a probe could be spun as "a partisan witch hunt." However, he said that equation changes if there was willful criminality, because "nobody is above the law."

Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 April 15, 2008 12:21 PM EDT
. We''''d be better going with Hillary Clinton. She is experienced in the Repub. ways. They have nothing new on her and she''''s smart and tough.

Posted by ksh1022 at 09:13 AM : Apr 15, 2008


Unfortunately, Hillary is a liar, untrustworthy and she and Bill are in bed with big business and lobby and special interest groups that may continue to make them rich but will never help the average American. If Hillary is the choice, we''d better get going with John McCain because only the most loyal of Clinton supporters (18% of the Dems) want her out of 100% of the electorate.
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 April 15, 2008 12:18 PM EDT
I think that many of the points made in this article are very, very true and spot on--unfortunately just as many negatives are the case for Hillary. If Obama loses, she probably cannot carry the black vote, her actions on many issues to do with Hispanics will lose to McCain (he voted for illegal immigration amnesty and risked his party votes, she abstained; he''s stuck by Hispanics--Hillary has tried to pretend to be tough and reversed herself)But here is where Hillary''s biggest losts are--she is HATED. Yep. despised, not wanted by most Republicans and most Independents. so in a head to head --in a year when Dems should have easily won, they ran two minority risks that almost ensure that the Dem nom won''t win. I say almost because McCAin is a very weak, and violatile candidate. Based on his emotional outbursts like publicly calling his wife a ****, and his numerous memory lapses, he''s liable to stroke out or have such a huge, unforgiveable gaffe that he will do himself in, anyway. More appropos to worry about who McCAin''s running mate is, than who he is.
Reply to this comment
by ksh1022 April 15, 2008 12:13 PM EDT
It seems most of these recent posts are frantic. They are from Obama supporters who are obviously naive politically. This author makes several valid points. Obama is not electable. The core Democratic voters and indep. will not vote for a racist loving, far left elitist with almost no experience. If most of them were old enough to know or wise enough to research history of politics in the last 40 years, they would learn about names like Mondale, Dukakis, and Kerry. They Dem. party put them up and the Republicans took them down hard. We''d be better going with Hillary Clinton. She is experienced in the Repub. ways. They have nothing new on her and she''s smart and tough.
Reply to this comment
by writescripts April 15, 2008 12:13 PM EDT
Where is Colin Powell? He and Condi Rice would be perfect for the ticket. I think Obama, Hillary and John aren''t right for the job in running our country.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 April 15, 2008 12:10 PM EDT
http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/


Tuesday: Tough
Posted on April 15, 2008 by riverdaughter
Guys, I broke down and watched Hardball yesterday. Yep, girded my loins and waded right into it. What I learned was that nobody cares about being called unsophisticated rubes who are too bitterly bigoted to see Obama%u2019s magnificence. It%u2019s no biggy. How did Tweety et al know that? Oh, you know, they%u2019ve been around politics for so long. Plus, Bob Shrum was utterly convinced that Hillary better not try to win with superdelegates because that would devastate the party and drive away AAs and wealthy DINKS and young%u2019uns and we would lose the election. (This is an area in which he has a lot of experience) He forgot about the 60% of the Democratic party that actually vote. You know, women. Apparently, we don%u2019t care that Obama will have to win with superdelegates and by suppressing MI and FL and by extension all of the other Clintonates. They just know we%u2019ll be cool with that.

.....


Dems are not supporting Obama its the well male losers in the Party almost every major Dem male supporter lost their own race well Brazile too

Dems are not supporting Obama its the well male losers in the Party almost every major Dem male supporter lost their own race well Brazile too%u2026..and looks like Obama has another crazy ole uncle JIMMY CARTER going to his buddy Rezko home country to meet with Hamas..
Reply to this comment
by burningsplee April 15, 2008 11:47 AM EDT
I''ve got a beef with Sen. Hillary Rotten Clinton. First and foremost, when Hillary says that everyone who scrambles aboard the Hillary Rotten Clinton bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride, that''s just a load of spucatum tauri. Far be it for me to treat people''s bona fide personal devastation as bathos. So maybe we have not only a right but also a responsibility to expose the connections between the reckless problems that face us and the key issues of elitism and negativism. Big deal. What''s more important is that it must be pointed out that her commentaries stink. So don''t feed me any phony baloney about how men are spare parts in the social repertoire -- mere optional extras. That''s just not true.

If Hillary is victorious in her quest to shred the basic compact between the people and their government, then her crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. Her argument that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune, is hopelessly flawed and entirely circuitous. I have the following to say to the assertion that Hillary is omnipotent: Baloney! I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can''t say that I''m 100% true to this, but Hillary''s frequent vacillating leads me to believe that she has been deluding people into believing that her way of life is correct and everyone else''s isn''t. Don''t let her delude you, too.
Reply to this comment
by fuzzybear9 April 15, 2008 11:44 AM EDT
Hello Bitter Pennsylvania Voters

Fuzzy what is the Topic today ?

Change

I was just thinking about the late Protoge Kennedy
from Hawvard

`` I Have a Dream , I have been up on the Mountain of Chapaquitic and I have a Dream
Ask not what your country can do for you
But ask what you can do for the Kennedy`s ``

Pity Pity Pity

we need more money from the American People
to fill our dream

now the cry goes out again from the Elietist Kennedy Camp
Pity Pity Pity
Bobby Bobby Obama

sincerely your completely entertained Bear
Fuzzy
Reply to this comment
by jgunther7 April 15, 2008 11:34 AM EDT
What a lot of rubbish, Hillary Clinton is now telling us what she is not able to tell us. This shows how stupid she thinks the electorate is. We are not buying another Clinton lie. I am bitter, mad as hell and I am not going to take it anymore.
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo April 15, 2008 11:34 AM EDT
"What Clinton Wishes She Could Say..."

"Bill, I want a divorce." - soon after, if she loses the election.
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood April 15, 2008 11:24 AM EDT
As far as I know, I have no reason to believe Hillary Clinton is a monster; there''s no basis for that, I take her on the basis of what she says. And, you know, there isn''t any reason to doubt that.
Reply to this comment
See all 321 Comments

60 Minutes

How gold pays for Congo's deadly war; Bob Ballard, the great explorer; and more.
Read More

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Poll: Rush Most Influential Conservative

    (202 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications:

What do you think of President-elect Obama picking Hillary Clinton for his Cabinet?
 Brilliant
 Risky
 Awful