Comments on: Obama Seeks To Reshape The Electorate
Politico: Campaign Turns Attention To Ambitious General Election Plan To Bring New Voters To The Polls
- Too bad Roy Orbison is dead - Obama could have him sing - "It''s over, it''s over, it''s ooovveeerrr - IT''S OOOOOOOOOVVVVVVVVVVVEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- "Obama Seeks To Reshape The Electorate"
I''m a little round...Does he intend to make me flat? - Reply to this comment
- Obama''s campaign managers are blissfully ignorant that they are riding for a big fall in November.
- Reply to this comment
- Hillarygrl34 - give it up will ya! This race is OVER. Money talks and BS walks - period. Obama leads in every major category. including the biggest which is fund raising. If you think Hillary is taking money from big corporations looking for special favors your out of your mind. No doubt Obama raises much of his money through small donors - overall he is much less beholding to big business than your candidate.
Bottom line is you need money to get your message out in order to win an election. Hillary is broke, she can''t pay past bills never mind fund future ones. Obama rakes in donations faster then the govenment can print money. FACE FACTS - IT''S OVER, the only question remaining is how long Hillary hangs on and how many people she screws financially before she quits. - Reply to this comment
- RowdyTexan2, pepperp1,
Rigged the election for Obama? Are you serious. Have you not been in a political campaign before because it seems that this is your first and you don''t know how to act responsibly. You continue to spew vile here on these board. I know that RowdyTexas still believe that with Michigan and Florida that Hillary is ahead but even with those two states added in, Obama is 200,000 votes ahead, without about 827,000 votes ahead and 168 delegates.
I don''t get what you want? Do you want Obama to drop out of the race because Hillary is running? - Reply to this comment
- neonink ar 09:25 wrote: For over 16 years;
NEONINK, YOU HAVE A GOOD POINT. THERE A LOT OF AMERICANS THAT FEEL THE SAME WAY.
I HAVE WITNESSED 10 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS OVER FORTY YEARS, AND THERE IS AN OLD SAYING, "I AINT NEVER SEEN NO *** LIKE THIS."
THE REPORT FROM " THE NONPARTISAN CENTER FOR MEDIA AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS HAVE FOUND THAT SINCE LAST DECEMBER, 83% OF THE REPORTING FOR OBAMA WAS POSTIVE. WHILE ONLY 53% OF THE REPORTING ON CLINTON WAS POSTIVE." THIS IS PROBABLY A LITTLE (LOT) CONSERTIVE TO SAY THE LEAST.
GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT " G D AMERICA." - Reply to this comment
- pepperp1,
Obama thugs in Caucus states? You know what is so rediculous about all the Obama comments is that you are going by Hillary talking points, which suggest that somehow Obama has cowed over the high educated voters. And then Hillary has you believing she is the poor underdog. Sniffle, sniffle, all the boys are picking on me. sniffle, sniffle.
And then so many others are so enamered by Hillary they believe they are being cheated in some way by Obama winning. Did their parents teach them nothing about being good losers, shaking their opponents hands for a good campaign and then moving on to get a dem elected in November. We''re talking about continuing the war or not people - this is not a beauty contest. And you have to remember that Hillary voted for the war. - Reply to this comment
- Hillarygirl34,
Pay closer attention to your candidate for fraud, corruption, and generally a shallow character. Obama may be much different than the average WASP but America is multi-colored, multi-ethnic, and certainly never belonged to closed-minded people like yourself. Perhaps you will miss the Bush era of hating everyone who is non-christian, and darker skinned than the pale white but psychiatric care is available for you and the many feeble minds behind McCain and Clinton. - Reply to this comment
Zogby''s poll are *** and his brother works at the DNC and is a Obamaiete. Dont believe thsi hog wash and Politico spin off form that WAPO Newweek politcal tabloid
Help the Dems keep their Party away from this anti American milatants on the LEFT FRINGE of wack a do land.- Reply to this comment
- The Dem Party the majority of the Base, is at war with the Fringe and the Dean DNC who have rigged this race for Obama, to take their Party back unlike the Republicans and the control they gave to their fringe CC Right and the Neo Con Puppet Masters, DEMS ARE FIGHTING THIS PRETENDER OFF - TURN OUT AND VOTE keep this Party out of the hands of more fringe control intrest also backed by the energy companies fight them off VOTE in the Primary in mass.
- Reply to this comment
- In seven years of his Illinois senate terms, Mr. Obama could not reach across party lines and get one piece of legislation passed. He had one successful year when he was literally given all the legislation to write.
As a US senator, Mr. Obama has named a post office, and passed a bill in support of efforts in the Congo.
Exactly HOW does anyone figure that he can define anything, that he can solve anything, that he can bring America together, when he can''t even unite his own party or lead anybody to pass legislation. - Reply to this comment
- Bringing new voters to the polls "is going to be a very big part of how we win,"
What really going on is Obama and his Thugs have exploited small Red States Caucuses with activist who have intimidated or tricked participants, he has used the Race card poor victim white People picking on him too many times until a brave Dem 72 year old Geraldine Ferrraro called him on it and shamed him, he and his militants supporters are spreading lies and distortions about his opponents both Hillary and McCain, his energy company backers have given him so much money he is buying buying super delegates, and he has a militant press and Obama net response team out threatening elected Black officials like Lewis like Nutter who do not support him headed by Rep J Jackson Jr and they are as well attempting to suppress turnout through fear hate negative attacks on Hillary to make you think she is losing when if all voters or counted its a tie even with the *** he is pulling and his bought media hacks and pollster like DNC Zogby, and with Dean help he has disqualified two states with small black liberal young voters intentionally don%u2019t fall for the rule line it%u2019s a lie SC broke the same rule. Every time you peel the Obama onion its shows another ugly anti American layer careful what you drink here recall GWB is recall a Neo Con puppet has you known etc.
The Dem Party is at war with the Fringe and the Dean DNC to take their Party back unlike the Republicans they are FIGHTING help them. - Reply to this comment
- The only thing Obama has reshaped for me is my choice come November.
For 16 years, I''ve voted straight ticket Dem.
If Obama is the Dem. and based on what the media has blatantly done to basically profess him King Obama, I''ll reshape my vote and punish every democrat, by voting straight ticket Republican. I do not like the powerful media pushing one candidate over another.
I guess hell can freeze over once in a while. - Reply to this comment
- Hildebrand said the Campaign is likely to turn its attention and the energy to its massive volunteer army this fall on registering African-American voters and voters under 35;
NO SURPRISE HERE. REGISTERING AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTERS.
OBAMA NEEDS SLOW DOWN A LITTLE. THE LAST TIME CHECKED, HE HASN''T WON THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION YET. IF HILLARY WINS, WILL HE STILL CONTINUE TO USE HIS MASSIVE VOLUNTEER ARMY TO REGISTER BLACK VOTERS TO SUPPORT HER?
GOD "BLESS" AMERICA. NOT "G D AMERICA." - Reply to this comment
- There is no doubt that this campaign has taken the wierdness factor to new levels, but wierd authors of rhetoric are all bark and no bite. Most of them don''t vote.
The Pennsylvania race does bring out the best in voter support. Both Obama and Clinton have honed and improved their skills in articulating through a difficult path.
Obama''s oration skills and debating techniques are clearly a product of his good education.
Clinton''s campaign and cheerleading techniques are clearly a product of her experience.
I still believe that Clinton and Obama need each other and belong together on the Presidential election ticket in November. - Reply to this comment
- As a state leader in Illinois, Obama was the only senator not to vote in favor of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act, which protects babies who survive a botched abortion from being killed. On the day of the vote, March 30, 2001, Obama spoke from the floor, saying that the bill placed an undue burden on doctors to keep a child alive. "We''re probably crossing the line in terms of unconstitutionality," he said. More recently, Obama also voted against Sen. John Ensign''s (R-Nev.) bill that would have encouraged parental involvement in teens'' abortion decisions. Had it passed, the amendment would have authorized government funds to enforce the laws that prevent taking teens across state lines for a secret abortion.
Oreo is quite the liberal now ain''t he. He don''t care who he kills. That''s what I like about Liberals, they usually go after the defenseless. - Reply to this comment
- Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) took a break from defending his pastor''s controversial remarks--and instead made a few of his own. When pressed at a town hall meeting to discuss his approach to the AIDS crisis, Obama talked about the importance of teaching both comprehensive *** education and abstinence. But few on either side of the issue were prepared for the blunt remarks that followed. "The most important prevention is education, which should include...teaching the children... you know, that *** is not something casual... Look, I''ve got two daughters--9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don''t want them punished with a baby. I don''t want them punished with an STD at age 16, so it doesn''t make sense to not give them information [about contraception or abortion]." Reporters have since called the Obama campaign to question his use of the word "punishment." Not surprisingly, pro-lifers are outraged by the statement, which many believe to be a slap in the face of out-of-wedlock mothers and a telling look at the senator''s views on unborn children. However harmless Obama meant the comments to be, they do align with his voting record on abortion legislation.
- Reply to this comment
- Part II
These numbers are distorted by the fact that people with successful marriages usually marry only once, while people with failed marriages have often married and divorced multiple times. Fortunately, new data from pollster George Barna included a more meaningful statistic. Of all Americans who have ever married, only one-third have ever been divorced. This two-to-one ratio of marital success should encourage young people who may actually fear the "50-50" marriage myth. Another misconception is that a person''s religion and values have nothing to do with marital success. Barna found that the percentage of people who have been divorced after marrying is lower among Catholics, evangelicals, and conservatives than it is among non-Christians and liberals. That''s not to mention the fact that more born-again Christians (84%) have been married in the first place than atheists and agnostics (65%). For those just embarking on the adventure of marriage, be encouraged--your chances of making it "until death do you part" may be better than you''ve been told.
Oopha! - Reply to this comment
- Hey, the percentage of students who graduate in Blue States is 1 out of every 4. In Detroit they are dropping out like flies. That''s the Blue State philosophy. Keep them dumb. And for the guy who so proudly said that divorce is greater in Red States. Here''s a little tidbit for ya. (Donnie 900 and his many monikers)
Part I
One of the common myths about marriage in America is that "50% of all marriages end in divorce." But that figure is derived not from long-term analysis but from the fact that the raw number of new divorces each year is roughly 50% of the raw number of new marriages. - Reply to this comment




