Comments on: "Gay Question" General Linked To Clinton

Politico: Debate Questioner Who Asked About Gays In The Military Is Co-Chair Of Group For Hillary

Add a Comment See all 106 Comments
by dan9111 November 29, 2007 2:47 PM EST
We need more gaymen like this, but allied with Conservatives instead. Why? Because the feminist divorce industry has bankrupted families, leaving children fatherless and turning kids into value-less "living dolls" for single moms to profit from.

Every gayman puts feminism where the belongs -- in the shack of history with other bigotry. Someday when there is gay-divorce, it will be obvious because there is no "man" to steal from. They would both be same-***, and hopefully without kids. The divorce industry will shut down fast, and feministas will have to get jobs. Social conservatives know the cure for family-destruction. It is just a painful counterintuitive one.
Reply to this comment
by deegeetau November 29, 2007 2:44 PM EST
I am absolutely disgusted with CNN''s incredibly biased production last night planting Democrat participants in a Republican debate. Review all the uncovered plants here: http://michellemalkin.com/2007/11/29/digging-out -the-cnnyoutube-plants-abortion-questioner-is-ed wards-supporter/

A new study released by Harvard University and highlighted in Editor & Publisher finds more than 60% of Americans do not trust the MSM''s political and Presidential campaign coverage. After last night those numbers will surely increase and CNN''s "approval numbers" will fall way below those of even Congress.

CNN has turned into a pathetic extension of the Democrat party and has lost all credibility as an independent news source.

While I believe Wolf should stay under tight scrutiny, it is clear that Anderson Cooper will have to take a hike and CNN management needs to aggressively apologize to the American public.
Reply to this comment
by djordje1-2009 November 29, 2007 2:42 PM EST
This issue has been beaten worse than a dead horse. Get over it! What is the gay representation within the military, 1%? Less? Furthermore, why should our military institutions have to pander to alternative lifestyles and create turbulence with the 99% majority of soldiers. If someone wants to be gay, and also be in the military, they need only shut their mouth and serve this country. Everyone has a choice in this country and those who do not care for the policies of the military should not enlist. Our military institutions have no place for activists and/or the promotion of radical agendas that are way out of sync with the overwhelming majority. If that is too hard to accomplish, let''s set up a separate "gay only" branch of our military and not listen to this garbage anymore.
Reply to this comment
by simonsez40 November 29, 2007 2:20 PM EST
Hillary panders to swishy men, and Bill likes fat piggies.

LOL


Posted by nameverify

And Republican Curtis and Craig take WIDE STANCES......

THEY don''t belong there HWY - they are already there and have been seen the age of dawn.......in fact THEY are all around you just don''t have a clue and let fear and ignorance control your thought process.
Reply to this comment
by hwy71so November 29, 2007 1:45 PM EST
The general didn''t have to share his quarters. All he has to go on is reports sent up to him. Reports of which, most likely, one of his aides read and requested the general''s signature.

*** have no place in the military. They are a liability.
Reply to this comment
by simonsez40 November 29, 2007 12:59 PM EST
Who cares about this issue? Just another HOT TOPIC to get the Religious Right all riled up! I''m sure SINGINRICK will be in here shortly educating us all.......
Reply to this comment
See all 106 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: