Comments on: Obama's Strategy: Emulate Reagan

Conservative Icon's 1980 Bid Is A Blueprint For An Insurgent Campaign

Add a Comment See all 175 Comments
by SIDNEYWILLIAMSMD July 26, 2007 2:35 AM EDT
THE ISLAMOFASCIST CONSPIRACY CONTINUES: Obama has yet to confront Islamofascism in any speech It is a religious-political movement striving to establish a worldwide theocracy (World Government) ruled by a Caleph (the title for a religious/political dictator). Under an islamofascist theocracy, all non-muslims and freedom loving muslims would be destroyed.
Adolph Eichman%u2019s deputy Dieter Wisliceny in Nuremberg Trials testimony stated: "The Mufti [Islamic leader of Jerusalem Hau Amin el-Husseni] was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry and had been a collaborator and adviser of Eichmann and Himmler in the execution of this plan. He was one of Eichmann%u2019s best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures." Hitler%u2019s personal body guards were Islamofascists recruited by the Mufti into an elite SS unit of the Hanjar Division.
The same Mufti stated in his post WWII memoirs "Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish problem in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: The Jews are yours."

Obama does not understand the above.
Reply to this comment
by name_verify July 26, 2007 2:19 AM EDT
Is this about the negro problem again?
Reply to this comment
by laland69 July 26, 2007 2:04 AM EDT
Obama is the man. If people would stop looking at his race and instead listen and open their minds they would see a very impressive candidate who makes Hillary look like a overplayed fool. Its time for new and bold ideas.
Reply to this comment
by gene0819 July 26, 2007 1:48 AM EDT
Obama is a shell. He has proven nothing to the American people. His ONLY claim to anything is that he didn't vote to start the Iraq war...he might be worthy of consideration in 2012...
Reply to this comment
by huanaco July 26, 2007 1:40 AM EDT

OBAMA WINNING THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOMINATION IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR REPUBLICAN TO WIN. OBAMA, DO AMERICA A FAVOR, QUIT THE RACE.
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 July 26, 2007 12:35 AM EDT
Your statement is an out and out lie. He did not slash the budget for intelligence agencies. He did slash the budget for the Defense Department which include some cuts in their agencies, but only with bipartisan participation (and with a republican controlled congress) to close cold war era bases and programs.

Those were the good ole day now the Defense Department is draining the Treasury and future debt for years to come, for the wars they do not seem able to manage without major error to the tune of 12 Billion each and every month
Reply to this comment
by tomar0317 July 26, 2007 12:28 AM EDT
Obama is the man. Unfortunatley if he dittos Reagan, falsity won't be far behind. Don't follow Reagan's lead. PATCO controllers remember too well and though we're vindicated with continued accussations against the FAA by todays puppet controllers, Obama my bud, don't go down this particular road.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 July 26, 2007 12:05 AM EDT
mh4cbs1

"Hillary is just one of those slick slimey corporate-owned politicions who will say what she needs to to get elected."

And she isn't alone. Every single one of those candidates will do exactly the same thing. You can not believe anything that comes out of their mouths for that very reason.

Reply to this comment
by name_verify July 25, 2007 11:45 PM EDT
MACACA = SAVAGE WHO WIPES WITH HIS OWN HAND
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 July 25, 2007 11:29 PM EDT
hawksprings is one of those FOX "News" watchers who are in complete ignorance of the FACTS.

FACT is that Bush and Cheney deliberately lied to us about WMDs and fake Al Qaida links. They exploited 911 with their color coded terror alerts, AXIS of Evil *** and the whole orchestrated campaign to Invade a nation that was NOT a threat to us. (Remember Cheney feeding Judith Miller of the NY Times fake WMD stories and then going on the Sunday AM news shows to say "The NY Times just reported that..lie, lie, lie..)

As a result of our Invasion of Iraq, Bush has Fueled the Terrorist cause and recruitment. Osama has regrouped in Pakistan as we let him off the hook to invade Iraq. We have 3,600 dead troops (hardly a way to "support the troops" huh!), wasted $500 Billion on War, huge tax cuts for the filthy rich, a massive national debt (remember when Republicans acted like they cared).

Remember when Republicans would care about liberty? Cheney/Bush illegally are wiretapping all YOUR emails (source AT&T maintenance personnel caught NSA in the act).

Save America!! IMPEACH Cheney and Bush and throw them in JAIL.

Reply to this comment
by radiob-2009 July 25, 2007 11:27 PM EDT
The Civil War it was Clintons fault, The war or 1812 it was Clintons fault, It has not rained in a mth and my crops are all dead again Clintons fault, my cow Bessie is not giving Milk its Clintons fault, the flood England just had was Clintons fault, Eve taking a bite out of the apple that was his fault too, Heck what ain't Clintons fault? That thar good economy we had when he was in office that was not his fault that was the republicans fault yep just like that smile on Monica's face was the republicans fault too.
Reply to this comment
by randalds July 25, 2007 11:20 PM EDT
hawksprings said: "9/11 may have happened on the Bush watch... afterwards we've found out that the preparations for the attack were YEARS in the making...Clinton had Osama offered to him"

Do the words 'Al-Qaida determined to attack in the U.S.' mean anything to you? They meant something to Richard Clarke, Bush's counterterrorism expert, but apparently nothing to Condi Rice, his chief of 'National Security'. Clinton got Osama's message and tried to kill him via cruise missile. Bush gave Clinton's warnings the cold shoulder, with 9-11 as the result. Afterward, he essentially GAVE Osama what he was asking for (closing the US bases in Saudi Arabia).

That's the Republican way, I guess...
Posted by ubrew12 at 07:52 PM : Jul 25, 2007

Also the idea the bin Laden was somehow offered up to Clinton and refused by him is pure bullsh*it. It's an urban legend. A right wing pundit lie made up out of whole cloth. It's in the same pile of garbage as the idea that the Clinton's took government property when they left the White House. It sounds good coming out of Limbaugh's mouth, but both are simply not true in any manner.
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 July 25, 2007 11:19 PM EDT
standlee5:

I agree about Edwards. The media have it in for him because he is not the corporate candidate (Hillary IS). So they will short change his coverage and marginalize him with all the pretty boy stories. The media won't go after Obama (right now) as he is African American -- but wait till the mudslinging starts and they will be merciless in repeating the attacks and impressions created by the Clinton camp.

Hillary is just one of those slick slimey corporate-owned politicians who will say what she needs to to get elected. And if nominated, she will be defeated just like Gore and Kerry because she likewise won't speak the truth to the corporate money and the 'handlers'. Bush won and Reagan won because "you may not agree with me but you know where I stand".

If Clinton is nominated I will vote independent or Green Party before I vote for another corporate ***.

Reply to this comment
by randalds July 25, 2007 11:17 PM EDT
Oh yes, I'm sorry, Clinton is innocent as the pure, driven snow, isn't he?
Cutting funds for our intelligence agencies, prohibiting them from sharing info with each other so they might be able to put the pieces together, etc., none of those things Clinton did contributede to 9/11, did they?

Maybe not in Crazyland.

Clinton claims he gave "warnings" to Bush about Osama, which I place as much faith is as his statement "I did not have sexxual relations with that woman..."

...
Posted by hawksprings at 07:56 PM : Jul 25, 2007

Your statement is an out and out lie. He did not slash the budget for intelligence agencies. He did slash the budget for the Defense Department which include some cuts in their agencies, but only with bipartisan participation (and with a republican controlled congress) to close cold war era bases and programs. He did not "forbid" agencies to talk to each other. They were following the same procedures that had been in place for decades. Last but not least he did not himself give Bush information about bin Laden or al-Qaeda. Bush's incoming transition teams were briefed by Richard Clarke and Bush himself was briefed by the CIA (as was Cheney), yet both he and his team ignored those briefings until after 911 and held not one single meeting concerning terrorism.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 July 25, 2007 11:05 PM EDT
John Edwards is not getting the coverage he deserves. He's one of the only Democrat candidates that represents true change and bold ideas. Obama is not the new JFK, Edwards is. I think he's the only candidate who as president will protect American public from run-amok-corporate greed. I do wish he would make a clearer stand on illegal immigration.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings July 25, 2007 10:56 PM EDT

Oh yes, I'm sorry, Clinton is innocent as the pure, driven snow, isn't he?
Cutting funds for our intelligence agencies, prohibiting them from sharing info with each other so they might be able to put the pieces together, etc., none of those things Clinton did contributede to 9/11, did they?

Maybe not in Crazyland.

Clinton claims he gave "warnings" to Bush about Osama, which I place as much faith is as his statement "I did not have sexxual relations with that woman..."

...
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 July 25, 2007 10:52 PM EDT
hawksprings said: "9/11 may have happened on the Bush watch... afterwards we've found out that the preparations for the attack were YEARS in the making...Clinton had Osama offered to him"

Do the words 'Al-Qaida determined to attack in the U.S.' mean anything to you? They meant something to Richard Clarke, Bush's counterterrorism expert, but apparently nothing to Condi Rice, his chief of 'National Security'. Clinton got Osama's message and tried to kill him via cruise missile. Bush gave Clinton's warnings the cold shoulder, with 9-11 as the result. Afterward, he essentially GAVE Osama what he was asking for (closing the US bases in Saudi Arabia).

That's the Republican way, I guess...
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings July 25, 2007 10:46 PM EDT

9/11 may have happened on the Bush watch, only 7 months in to it, but afterwards we've found out that the preparations for the attack were YEARS in the making, during the time Slick Willy was getting blow jobs in the Oral Office from Monica as he leaned against the desk and talked foreign policy on the phone to *** Morris.
Clinton had Osama offered to him, to bad he didn't turn down Monica and accept what the Sudanese were offering.

As to the "lies", you act like the lies about Saddam and WMDs started during Bush's presidency. Why then do you ignore the "lies" that Clinton, Nancy P, Ted K, and Algore said about Saddam and WMD, YEARS before Bush was elected.

Where the Democrats lying too, then? Hmmm???

...
Reply to this comment
by ringading3 July 25, 2007 10:42 PM EDT
Hay Osama Boy! U keep being up-pity, and no reparations for U!
Reply to this comment
by ubrew12 July 25, 2007 10:39 PM EDT
screen_name_ at said: "Barak the Magic Negro...
Lives in DC...
The man from the L.A. paper says he's black...
But not authentically... "

Thanks for posting. We only suspected you were trivial before, now we know not to read your racist cr*p.
Reply to this comment
See all 175 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: