Comments on:


by andor3 August 15, 2008 4:51 AM EDT: "...but as his "blueprint for change" gets better understood, and as our need for serious leadership grows, he will emerge as the next President of our United States. Go Obama! "

Yes! An important point is that Americans recognized our need and demanded change and sought a President who could lead again, and drafted Obama to run. Obama is not calling for change, he is answering the call.; Reply to this comment


by vietnam21 August 15, 2008 3:56 AM EDT: OBAMA RESPONSE TO THE CRISIS ...UHHHH DUHHHHH; Reply to this comment


by emelder August 15, 2008 3:42 AM EDT: Masterlink said, "At every crossroads to the future, tradition has placed 10,000 men to guard the past." This is why creating positive change is so difficult ... fear, vested interests, established "leaders" ... so much is working against Obama ... but as his "blueprint for change" gets better understood, and as our need for serious leadership grows, he will emerge as the next President of our United States. Go Obama!; Reply to this comment


by leykis1oh1 August 15, 2008 3:39 AM EDT: "more than 20 of..."
I figured you''d need the correction.; Reply to this comment


by leykis1oh1 August 15, 2008 3:36 AM EDT: mike071067
You are ignorant. More YouTube hits is not necessarily a good thing. People get tons a hits because they do stupid *** and people are like, "*** did that idiot do now?" And, a so-called left wing slanted article can''t match right wing T.V. You act as if more then 20 of you can operate a computer. You and your ilk are so stupid, you have the one candidate who could save America but you''re choosing the old crazy idiot. The one that your president talked ALL KINDS of *** about when they were running against each other...now McSame is his buddy. You and your ilk beat Kerry to death but I guess the shrub/********* is allowed to flip-flop. You have the memory of a goldfish. Get off your sister, mortgage the trailer and buy a friggin'' clue.
RosieOD4Prez
U R right. Americans are far too stupid and scared to even think of electing a "naygra". They''d rather have America driven into the ground by a bunch of old white guys who don''t give a *** about you...or me...or America. As Zappa said, "You ain''t even number 2!"..."ain''t it bleak when you got so much nothin''. So whadaya do..?"; Reply to this comment


by timdgrim August 15, 2008 3:23 AM EDT: The wrinkled, white-haired dude can get Cindy to shake all the hands he wants. In the end after Exxon-John loses, her arm will be in a sling and so will his arse... be in a sling. -Heh-
Posted by RandyNason
************
Cindy "Pill Popper" McCain didn''t hurt her hand shaking hands...let''s just say she hurt it shaking the Republican Poll!; Reply to this comment


by randynason August 15, 2008 3:04 AM EDT: According to what I''ve heard on the subject, Exxon-John McSame is a cyber loser and has a really bad, confusing and el-lame-o web site. It kinda reflects him. The wrinkled, white-haired dude can get Cindy to shake all the hands he wants. In the end after Exxon-John loses, her arm will be in a sling and so will his arse... be in a sling. -Heh-; Reply to this comment


by sistatee-2009 August 15, 2008 12:18 AM EDT: Ain''t never been to a politician''s web site. Ain''t never goin''.; Reply to this comment


by rosieod4prez August 15, 2008 12:07 AM EDT: "Jaeger describes Obama''s site as "clean" and McCain''s as "cluttered." - article

Clean because Obama has no content to his platform.

Dems woulda done better nominating Rosie O''Donell for President.; Reply to this comment