35 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jeannettelj says:
This story has been in the "strange" section for 4 days now. Time to move on.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jxknowles says:
Team spokesman, Hung Lo, said there was never any intent to insult Singapore. I believe him.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
brian_norwood says:
Definitely inappropriate for for the Chinese team. To be accurate to scale, the crescent should be no longer than 4 inches.
reply
erasmus111 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Is that how long your crescent is?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
darwufche says:
Who cares? Prudes.
Get a life.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
erichsh says:
"We didn't have the slightest intention to do anything funny on our trunks," said team manager Samuel "Long Dong" Wong.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
straightener--2008 says:
Much ado about nothing. And here I was thinking we Americans were the biggest prudes on the planet. I was at a pool this summer and all the guys were wearing clam diggers. I'm surprised they weren't wearing onesies like in the 40s.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
imnho says:
Sounds like the designer had a pair of big stones too design this. I guess he will have to go back to the drawing board and she what comes up.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sunide says:
Now, if the stars had been placed on either side of the moon... Well, then I would have to wonder.... ;)
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bobnjersey says:
["We didn't have the slightest intention to do anything funny on our trunks to insult Singapore," team manager Samuel Wong, who helped design the trunks, told the Straits Times. ]
-------------------------------------
c'mon ... nobody from the team noticed this?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
northof62 says:
This must be difficult for a country that would jail foreign nationals for spitting gum on the street. I find the suits quite amusing and think they would be the most sought for item at the Games. Preferably washed beforehand.
reply
1/3