Comments on: Bush Moves Against Home Financing Crisis

Plan Would Help Homeowners Facing Foreclosure Refinance Their Loans, But Not Sub-Prime Borrowers

[space_poet]

v_1618 - Bring it down a little, buddy. Shouting only makes you look like a lunatic. You have good points and intelligent people already know most of what your saying. I know you''re angry, but you are not furthering the cause by cursing Bush on the CBS board, in fact you are making most sane liberals and dems look bad, please reconsider your approach or go to a site that encourages that, if there is any.

Good movie, btw!

[standlee5]

Don''t forget the endless maintenance and upkeep for a house. Painting,plumbing,electric, fence repair, roof. It''s like houses are more of a liability than an asset. They get run down really fast.

[donnie900]

Even if you ate at nothing but mcdonalds! You couldn''t afford a 250,000 dollar home on 10 bucks an hour.. NOWAY!

There is noway a loan officer would approve that loan sober.

[dogsoul]

"So the government refinances the risky loans (meaning PAYOFF THE LENDERS) and the government (MEANING THE TAXPAYERS) now assume all of the risk - while the lenders walk away with all that profit they''''ve made."

This is classic liberal classism - big meany corporations are evil & greedy - we ''care'' about the average joe blah blah blah - all about feeling & sentiment, absolutely nothing about what''s ACTUALLY happening in the marketplace. IF Bush pays off the homeowners so they can pay their lenders OR he pays off the lenders on their behalf - what''s the difference? Well, to a liberal the difference is the feeling you get inside you when corporations get paid versus the masses that own them money... Frankly, if he''s GOING to pay someone, it may as well be the corporations seeing as THEY are the ones owed money... and these avg people who borrowed what they couldn''t afford are obviously not responsible enough to be trusted with their OWN money, much less MINE... Besides, I''m against Bush paying out MY taxes to EITHER party - avg Joe took the risk on the house - banks took the risk on avg Joe - if avg Joe fails to live up to his end of the deal, then it''s himself & the bank that should take the hit - not me....

[rushlimpdrug]

the car insurance?
and health insurance?

[mike71067]

This is a really good idea. That liberal idiot Chuck Schumer even admitted it, but had to throw in, "those were all Democratic proposals". What a jackkasss.

[donnie900]

The electricity? The car? The car maintenance?

[donnie900]

23, or 28 bucks an hour.. on a 40 hour work week.. can afford you maybe 100,000 dollar home. The mortgage? The taxes? The utilities? The upkeep and maintenance? The commute? The food? The cloths? The schools? The telephone? The cable? The water?

23 to 28 bucks an hour affords you 100,000 dollar home.. barely.

[v_1618]

BUSH STOP THIS STUPID GAME. YOU''''''''RE EVIL..THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK DECIDE THE VALUE OF THE PEOPLES WORK , THIS BAZTARZ DECIDE THE VALUE OF THE PEOPLES MONEY. THIS BAZTARDZ DECIDE THE VALUE OF ALL THE HOUSES IN THE UNITED STATES. THIS BAZTARDZ DECIDE THE VALUE OF ALL BUSINESS IN A FEW WORDS THIS BAZTARDZ DECIDE THE VALUE OF YOUR LIFE SIMPLE AS THAT....AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS DECIDED THAT YOUR LIFE IS LESS WORTH THAN A STUPID PAPER DOLLAR. THAT''''S WHAT THIS IS...THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS THE MOST DANGEROUS THREAT TO THE U.S. LIBERTY...AND THAT''''S WHAT YOU CALL IT LIBERTY AND DEMOCRACY YOU MORON !!!

....WWW.ZEITGEISTMOVIE.COM

[donnie900]

If you buy a house on a 10 buck an hour salary, expect to get evicted. Expect to get kicked out. Out on the street. In disgrace!

10 bucks an hour is not an income for a house. 20 bucks an hour ain''t.