Comments on: The "Independent" Voices Of Vaccine Safety

[faye100469]

One child becoming disabled after vaccines maybe a coincidence. But thousands of children becoming disabled following vaccines are not coincidences. OR prehaps we are in a "coincidence" epidemic! Why doesn''t the CDC investigate this "coincidence" epidemic?

[loveconquers]

The country is CURRENTLY in a Health Crisis. We are loosing a generation of children to autism.

If the public will not pay attention to our silent children perhaps they will hear the cries of their parents.

Too Many Too SOON

Take the *** out of our childrens vaccines.

It''s that''s simple.

[dr_am_mass]

There is no wiggle room in what I have discovered, invented, and can now show to your own eyes relative to vaccine induced brain damage;

The truth is this "we cannot all handle peanut butter, we cannot al handle penicillin, and we cannot all handle vaccines, in muliple injections, early in life (or adulthood) without determining in advance who can tolerate what..and who cannot. I have the means to answer this question and put an end to this debate conclusively...with solutions to address the safety factor - whihc is not there for all..

My work will start being released next month, on radio, and in courts; ...slow release phase; then Dec. this year - it is "globally released" ; then next year, we shall see if I am left standing. I can say this though, based on 21 years formal post-secondary training in the brain and behavioral sciences, a National and Provincial Scholar in the brain sciences - all I can say is trust what you can see, not what others "sell you"; I have invented the means for you to see for yourself. What yuo make of this information, that will be up to you.. it is coming... Dr AM MASS
[e-mail]

[dr_am_mass]

I solved this medical enigma in October of 2004.

Unfortunately, I was on the Board of Directors of the Canadian Psychiatric Association at the time, and had just been appointed the Resident Editor for one of their pharmacy sponsored journals.

The leader of the CPA exec. was intriqued at my medcial disoveries. Once "they" realized that my methods and inventions showed brain damage within hours and days of vaccination in infants and children - I was given the option of "play ball..or lose the ball" "You cannot cut off the branch we are all standing on" -meaning pharmacy would cut funding and journal adverstising dollars if a member of the CPA board, and resident editor of teh CPA journal, was publishing work and presenting at cionferences showing how vacciens have been causing brain damage (for many..inclusing aytims and sudden infant death.

My talks were cancelled, I lost my Board position, I have been blocked from speaking at Canadian Psychiatry conferences, they even went after my medical licence. I survived - it is a lonely walk to stand for truth and health over profits and nepotism.

My work will be on the International stage (and vaccine courts) by years end. One size fits all vaccines cause brain damage and I can now prove this with science and your own eyes. [e-mail] Dr AM MASS

[heartbreaki2]

RJbates69, i couldn''t agree with you more. while i''m sorry that so many people have ill children, it seems distraught parents are willing to blame the situation on even the flimsiest science rather than accept the simple fact that we still don''t know what causes the disease. surely that''s a difficult situation to be in, and i sympathize, but its very unfortunate that some grieving parents who have no qualifications whatsoever other than access to the internet, are trying to dictate public health policy that affects millions of children.

i expect the person who can demonstrate with results that are REPLICABLE, the cause of autism will win the Nobel Prize--and parents like the ones posting here will have been no help whatsoever to that work. as i was taught in science, the simplest answer is often the easiest. grand conspiracies that require multiple players to be "in on it," and all to harm defenseless children seems a bit more like an X-Files episode than real life.

[rjbates69]

Classic!

"because some antigens are deadlier than others"

Yes, like the ones that cause disease, as opposed to inert, killed, or attenuated (as in immunizations).

Or are you saying it''s better to be infected by live disease agents rather than those that do not cause the diseases they protect children from?

Children with HIV or other immunodeficiency issues, or even hyper-activated allergic responses may, in fact, need to be exempt from SOME vaccines. Most, however, will have a better chance surviving with them to prevent those same disease agent from killing them. I guess I have no idea what point you are trying to make.

There has been well over a billion people vaccinated for diseases on this planet, spanning over a century. And now, thanks to the internet and a bunch of people who have received their Ph.D. from google university, the knowledge base and consensus is being questioned. Yeah, again, I''m sorry. I''m going to go with the vast majority of medical and scientific professionals on this one, and the fact that greater than 95% have suffered nothing more than a sore arm and immunity from diseases that once killed and debilitated millions of children in the developed/western world and continue to kill and debilitate millions in the 3rd world.

But hey, it''s never ot late to regress to pre-20th century standards! Let''s bring the plagues of the past back just to show you have been wrong the whole time. Sounds like a great idea.

[aware4autism]

rjbates69, because some antigens are deadlier than others.

You may find this interesting.
Primary Immunodeficiency: When the Body''s Defenses are Missing
http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/primary_immuno.cfm

"Children with PI diseases, especially those with defective T cells, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and ataxia telangiectasia should not receive live virus vaccines, such as the oral polio, measles, and chicken pox (varicella) vaccines. It is not even safe to give live virus vaccines to children suspected of immunodeficiency until a definitive diagnosis is rendered. There is a risk that such vaccines could cause serious illness or even death."

[queekster1]

Oops, my mssg was a response to "rjbates69"

[queekster1]

"Aware4autism", there is quite a remarkable difference between daily exposre to viruses and bacteria through skin and orpheus, and exposure through injection. The number of antigens is not the problem, its the route in which they are entering the body, plus the added toxins contained in the vaccine vial. The adjuvants contained in vaccines (such as aluminum) are enough to cause the body to attack itself, such as in cases of vaccine-induced Rheumatoid Arthritus, and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (the CDC has statistics for these side-effects of certain vaccines).
I would like to see vaccines change to oral-only administration, and to be completely free of metals, and other toxic agents that have been PROVEN to cause neuro, immuno, gastro, etc. illnesses.

Have you considered looking at the research of Moskowitz? Very revealing facts about how the immune system works. (Moskowitz, R. (1985). Immunizations: A dissenting view. Reprinted in the Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data from the Journal of the American Institute of Homeopathy, 76(7). Chicago: Contemporary Books, Inc.)

[rjbates69]

aware4autism,

You point out there are more inoculation given today than in years pass. Since you''ve obviously looked into it, perhaps you could tell us the antigen load in the new vaccines compared to the older ones? How many antigens were in the old vaccines (dead/attenuated virus/bacteria) vs. recombinant protein).

Why is it that today''s vaccines, which have a fraction of the antigenic epitopes in them, are worse than those of the past with considerably more? Hundreds more?

And how many microbes did your body encounter today that elicited an immune response? You breath, eat, drink, touch, pick, and suffer wounds all the time. Why is it that a minute few or one in a dead or attenuated vaccine is going to cause problems where the hundreds of species with hundreds of antigenic epitopes on them are not a cause of concern? I''d really like to know this, as would other biologists and doctors. Perhaps you could explain your new found discoveries in immunology for us.

Thanks in advance.