Comments on: Rumor Watch: Governor Sarah Palin
CBS News Chased Down Rumors In Wasilla
- So what''s the deal? The folks who brought you the John Edwards and Bill Clinton affairs: National Enquirer is Alleging Sarah Palin has a Sexual relationship With Husband Todd''s Business Partner. The McCain Campaign is threating to sue and it''s interesting to note that the Enquirer hasn''t lost a law suit in 30+ years.
- Reply to this comment
- Reverend Wright (God .... America!)
William (I didn''''t bomb America enough!) Ayers
Frank Marshall Davis (Communist Party, USA, childhood mentor of Obama and pedophilia enthusiast)
Tony Rezko who gave Obama a sweetheart real estate deal, in return for $14 million pushed his way
Perry Sutton and Khalid Al-Monseur, OPEC lawyer and banker respectively, who got Obama into Harvard after he was turned down.
Who else haven''''t we heard about yet? Obama''''s been running for election for 20 months and less has been reported on him than we''''ve heard about Palin in less than 20 days.
New York news media: May you all be fired for abdicating the professional ethics of a journalist. And may your employer join the New York Slimes on the ash pit of history.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by ragnar30066
Bravo - Well stated Now Obama supporters, if Ragnar is incorrect, instead of name calling, ect., than prove it, please - Reply to this comment
- Another article that ignores the difference between earmarks and Congressional appropriations.
Posted by kesac4650 at 06:58 PM : Sep 12, 2008
Oh, we know "the difference".
If a Republican is behind it or is the beneficiary, it is "an appropriation".
If a Democrat is behind it or is the beneficiary, it is "an earmark".
Ask any Republican. - Reply to this comment
- Most who wanted serious truthful info on Palin never believed the book list was real. It muddied up the issue, making everyone discount the fact that Palin had asked the Librarian about the possiblity of removing books, and later fired her, only to rehire her when there was public outcry. I do believe Palin was testing the waters for censorship. It is one thing to discuss something like that once, but to bring it up again and then fire a librian, (the community fought to keep her job).
- Reply to this comment
- Check out these websites for non-partisan information on the candidates and their campaigns. Pass this information on to your friends and loved ones so they can be better informed.
"Fact Check"
http://www.factcheck.org/
A nonpartisan, nonprofit, "consumer advocate" for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics. They monitor the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews, and news releases. They accepts NO funding from business corporations, labor unions, political parties, lobbying organizations
"National Priorities Project"
http://www.nationalpriorities.org/
This project analyzes and clarifies federal data so that people can understand and influence how their tax dollars are spent. A very interesting site. - Reply to this comment
- sarah is a lost cause, this lunatic wants to restart a cold war!
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by sjw1253 at 07:02 PM : Sep 12, 2008
Well said - Reply to this comment
- Seems to me that Sarah Palin and Tonya Harding would understand each other very well. They would be sworn enemies, but they would understand each other.
- Reply to this comment
- xliberalcomi
You keep posting the same propaganda lies in all of the comment sections of all of the political articles and refer to Barack Obama''s books.
Show your intelligence and prove what you say by posting appropriate citations. If you truly had proof and it was truly in his books you would give legitimate citations to prove your points.
As usual - you are one of the Republicans who enjoy spreading lies that are meant to scare people of a perfectly qualified and honorable man just because you have an issue with people who are different from you.
You are a true discriminator and display enormous prejudice. Please re-read the constitution and remember that all men and women are created equal.
Religious belief was the biggest motivator for America to be born. Our founding forefathers had some great insight into equality but of course like any great idea that requires growth - their ideals needed to be spelled out over a couple of centuries.
We still have a tremendous amount of growth to go - in the ideals of equality - and as long as we are able to defeat people like you who are trying to turn back the clock - we may very well reach the goals of our forefathers...
DOWN WITH Prejudice and Discrimination!!! - Reply to this comment
- I am voting for Obama/Biden But that trash talk is totally uncalled for. The only thing you have shown is a distinct resemblance to the name callers I am voting against.
Posted by ToolMangler at 06:32 PM : Sep 12, 2008
Well said!
Obama presents himself well and is a compelling candidate. It''s his supporters like the one you called out that are a real turn off and forces you to second guess everything. They represent the ugly side of politics and seem to be proud of it. - Reply to this comment
Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy..




