Yea, Yea, Yea,... Five pages of mostly sniviling twits who want us to leave Iraq, the central focus of AlQuida, and send them to an armpit called Darfur under the Usless Nations "Leadership." I want a number...How many will die in Darfur before you leave them to fend for themselves.
For Clinton, the number was 18 dead and 72 wounded before he ran like a ***-slapped ***. If you can''t pull the trigger and stay in the fight until every one of the *** are dead or captured, you have no business being in a leadership position as Commander in Chief. Oh, BTW one of thos 18 dead was a classmate of mine in flight school at Ft Rucker.
Simply saying 31,000 plus injured. How many are permanently in living vegetable state with brain injuries, have become completely blind, lost all the limbs.
Oh, well does not matter as long as Halliburton is making 2 billions net profit per quarter and when 30 year cheap crude oil supply agreement is signed with big oil companies.
Go to Rense.com for insightful blogs and news releases. DOD/US imputes them as a threat. There is a great depiction of the team responsible for weapons of the masses destruction. WMD...
anticorp47. Question. I too noticed a time delay or buffering of casualty reports in RVN such as, the casualties from a truck convoy ambush not being reported all on one day but over a period of weeks. Unfortunately I no longer have the details so my recall of the incident would only be classified as anecdotal.
It would have been so much cheaper in terms of money had we just bought oil rather than follow King George the Usurper''s plan to steal it from Iraq. The loss of life and crippling injury are a Stupidity Surcharge added to the cost. We also have not reaped any oil from this blundering scheme. Come November...
Is one injury or death in a war built on lies too great a loss, or are 374,298?
Our political leaders appointed, designated, and elected seem to believe and think these are acceptable numbers. They don%u2019t? Then stop making excuses and bring our troops home now. Oh, this is a complicated matter is it?
While we may not be able to end every conflict faster, we should allow our law makers and leaders to experience firsthand all the many wonderful, positive benefits and splendor war cause and create by having it made law they all must serve on the frontline for a minimum of 6 months.
How about have an amendment added to the Constitution which mandates when the number of injured and dead exceed 375,000, then immediately and without fail or exception shall every person in a political position at the state or federal level have all of their children over the age of 18 immediately cease their current standing and be required to serve on the frontline in the military or civilian sector for a minimum amount of time to be no less than, equal or greater to the amount of time of the military member who has spent the longest amount of time in harm%u2019s way.
Where upon a appointed, designated, or elected political leaders has no children, then they will fall under the same circumstances and be immediately sent to the frontlines to support the existing conflict they so willingly send our troops to address.
It may not be an ideal solution, but it sure is a great start.
Who do they think they''re fooling with all these spooled up numbers. In Viet Nam, I would look at daily casualty reports and nowhere in the news, which was limited, would I see anything like the kia, mia, or wia figures that I had transmitted back to headquarters. It''s a shame that the greediest are running this country in all of its aspects. Let me put up just a few examples: War housing taxation outsourcing honesty integrity finance torture
I could go on this all day and still not be able to show disappointed I am in the way this country lies to its citizenry at any time. What is the latest tale from our fearless leader? How about We might be in a resesion or how about the great care that our vets are getting when they do return. FTA
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
For Clinton, the number was 18 dead and 72 wounded before he ran like a ***-slapped ***. If you can''t pull the trigger and stay in the fight until every one of the *** are dead or captured, you have no business being in a leadership position as Commander in Chief. Oh, BTW one of thos 18 dead was a classmate of mine in flight school at Ft Rucker.
Oh, well does not matter as long as Halliburton is making 2 billions net profit per quarter and when 30 year cheap crude oil supply agreement is signed with big oil companies.
DOD/US imputes them as a threat.
There is a great depiction of the team responsible for weapons of the masses destruction. WMD...
Unfortunately I no longer have the details so my recall of the incident would only be classified as anecdotal.
Posted by Inventagod
---------------------------
It''s called Freedom of Speech - but if the Republicans get back in office like the first 6 years of Bushit - there will be no Free Speech anymore!
Just like your stupid comment here - Free Speech - although I''d like to see you in Cuba getting waterboarded for that stupid comment!
I believe that if Republicans want waterboarding - I say we waterboard every single one of them.
Our political leaders appointed, designated, and elected seem to believe and think these are acceptable numbers. They don%u2019t? Then stop making excuses and bring our troops home now. Oh, this is a complicated matter is it?
While we may not be able to end every conflict faster, we should allow our law makers and leaders to experience firsthand all the many wonderful, positive benefits and splendor war cause and create by having it made law they all must serve on the frontline for a minimum of 6 months.
How about have an amendment added to the Constitution which mandates when the number of injured and dead exceed 375,000, then immediately and without fail or exception shall every person in a political position at the state or federal level have all of their children over the age of 18 immediately cease their current standing and be required to serve on the frontline in the military or civilian sector for a minimum amount of time to be no less than, equal or greater to the amount of time of the military member who has spent the longest amount of time in harm%u2019s way.
Where upon a appointed, designated, or elected political leaders has no children, then they will fall under the same circumstances and be immediately sent to the frontlines to support the existing conflict they so willingly send our troops to address.
It may not be an ideal solution, but it sure is a great start.
So about thirty years ago, Nam vets were saying Agent Orange cause all sorts of birth defects, sickness and cancers.
They were pooh-poohed away.
Denial, denial denial.
And many of them died in the denial process.
Then, slowly, the Vet Administration acknowledgesd "some" sicknesses, cancers and birth defects were indeed a result of Agent Orange.
So my question is - how many decades will it take for the Vet Administration to acknowledge depleted uranium is causing cancers and birth defects?
And how long will it take for these soldiers and marines to have their names on the casualty lists?
Oh, great - more guys on the corner with signs...
It''s a shame that the greediest are running this country in all of its aspects. Let me put up just a few examples:
War
housing
taxation
outsourcing
honesty
integrity
finance
torture
I could go on this all day and still not be able to show disappointed I am in the way this country lies to its citizenry at any time.
What is the latest tale from our fearless leader?
How about We might be in a resesion or how about the great care that our vets are getting when they do return. FTA