Comments on: Is Gaza Bombing Too Much? Bush Won't Say

While Backing Israel's Right To Defend Itself, White House Won't Say Whether Offensive Matches Threat

Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by alanw1077 January 3, 2009 1:57 PM EST
morphndol8 , I''m not even convinced you are human.
I''m aware that on the Internet there are websites that produce computer-generated prose, poetry, haiku, etc. Since no human could possibly write the drivel you post here, I''m thinking you''re cut and pasting the total cr*ap some software is coming up with.
Reply to this comment
by alanw1077 January 3, 2009 1:54 PM EST
In the media there exists this bizarre notion of %u201Cproportionality%u201D. We%u2019ve all seen this before: over a period of months or even years, thousands of small to medium rockets, all capable of killing a handful of people and doing medium damage, are fired into Israeli civilian areas. When Israel strikes back, they use F16 jets with thousand-pound bombs, and they use their massive tanks. Then, people start screaming that the Israeli response is not %u201Cproportionate%u201D. All I can say to this is: nonsense. This concept implies that the victim is constrained to using the same weapons as the attacker. It betrays a total lack of knowledge of the way warfare is, and always has been, conducted. The object of warfare is not to simply trade pinpricks, back and forth, infinitum. The object is to defeat your enemy and win. After Pearl Harbor, what should have been the US objective? Should we have simply replicated Japan%u2019s attack, and taken ships to Tokyo, killed 3000 people, wrecked 20 ships, and declared %u201COK, we%u2019re finished%u201D ? Or was it to defeat the enemy, totally and completely, so that they could not attack us again?
Reply to this comment
by impeach___w January 3, 2009 12:32 PM EST
Poor George W. The decicer can''t make a decision and he''s still not qualified to be the president. With only one month to run our country into the ground or the whole world depending on his ambition ( I think it will be the whole world)

This is just a ploy to get Iran or it''s actors to get involved too. So when Isreal bombs them, they will have SOME public opinon with them. Watch out around Jan 27 and Feb 28.
Seriously, circle those dates,
Reply to this comment
by ajayvee January 3, 2009 12:04 PM EST
People who expect anything to change when Obama comes in should remember that Sharon did not brag in the Knesset that "we, the Jewish people, control Bush" but that "we, the Jewish people, control America". So changing president will make no difference; just a different person obeying the same masters.
Reply to this comment
by gogwgo January 3, 2009 9:38 AM EST
Who cares what Bush or any other Americans thinks about it...

Israel needs to turn the Gaza strip into a parking lot!!
Reply to this comment
by gogwgo January 3, 2009 9:37 AM EST
Is Gaza Bombing Too Much? Bush Won''t Say
While Backing Israel''s Right To Defend Itself, White House Won''t Say Whether Offensive Matches Threat
=======

Clearly, that non-admission, means that it''''s FAR AND AWAY, over the top / way too much.

Especially from one of the most evil war mongers of our time.
Posted by IamHungry68 at 12:21 AM : Jan 03, 2009
====================


Hey Hungry, which of your Hamas kinfolk awoke to find an Israeli rocket stuck up their keester??
Reply to this comment
by abrame January 3, 2009 6:09 AM EST
-Corrupt, criminal Olmert, Criminal Barak, and snake Livni, taking her instruction from Big Snake Sarkozzy, are vowed to fail, in their attempt to crush the legal resistance, democratically voted in by the People of Palestine; Hamas.

Posted by trishab59

Have you thought of getting medication for this?
Reply to this comment
by abrame January 3, 2009 6:06 AM EST
Especially from one of the most evil war mongers of our time.

Posted by IamHungry68

Yes, Clinton.
Reply to this comment
by iamhungry68 January 3, 2009 3:21 AM EST
Is Gaza Bombing Too Much? Bush Won''t Say
While Backing Israel''s Right To Defend Itself, White House Won''t Say Whether Offensive Matches Threat




Clearly, that non-admission, means that it''s FAR AND AWAY, over the top / way too much.

Especially from one of the most evil war mongers of our time.
Reply to this comment
by wardoglrs January 3, 2009 3:13 AM EST
Google:
BENJAMIN FREEDMAN SPEAKS: A JEWISH DEFECTOR WARNS AMERIC
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: