Comments on: Obama Backs Chrysler Bankruptcy

Automaker Files Chapter 11; Will Receive $8B To Carry Through Deal With Fiat; Also Will Temporarily Halt Manufacturing

[mrzerato]

LOL, we CAN WE CAN? oh goody!!! let me rush right out and buy 4 wheels and a seat for $25,000 made by angry people losing their jobs and distracted by all this, and from a company going BANKRUPT, yup, I sure want to take that kind of risk and more risk for warrantees being fulfilled.
Posted by Newster1

Do you want the pin striping and the executive package with your purchase

[weedapeapl]

Except I'm takin in stride, and you're blaming the world.
Posted by gravypants at 7:09 PM : Apr 30, 2009

Oh, ya, I did the whole "takin it in stride" thing last time I was unemployed.

Ya, keep that positive attitude, be mellow and relaxed. A job is just around the next corner.

That was six years ago.

I finally figured it out. When you're calm and reasonable and you don't go around tearing into people, that means

YOU ARE A DOORMAT!!!!!!

It only invites people to wipe their feet on you and step all over you.

This time, I am not going quietly to lie down on the door step again.

This time I'm mad as h#ll, and I'm not going to take it anymore!!!

[Newster1]

Bankruptcy does not mean the No. 3 U.S. automaker will shut down."

Yes it does, when you leave all the dealers, suppliers and parts suppliers hanging with staggering losses just SEE if they will deal with you in the future, or at least not without full payment in ADVANCE.

"Consumers can still buy a Chrysler, warranties will be honored, and dealerships will continue to offer repair service,"


LOL, we CAN WE CAN? oh goody!!! let me rush right out and buy 4 wheels and a seat for $25,000 made by angry people losing their jobs and distracted by all this, and from a company going BANKRUPT, yup, I sure want to take that kind of risk and more risk for warrantees being fulfilled.

[weedapeapl]

the reason I voted against McCain/Palin was having Palin the whacko I'll-do-whatever-my-invisible-friend-tells-me-to-do evangelical on the ticket.
Posted by slownewsday05 at 7:03 PM : Apr 30, 2009

You do realize, don't you, that many voters had the exact same concern about JFK.

That didn't seem to be an insurmountable obstacle to him.

But with all his daddy's crime money, very little was insurmountable for JFK.

[weedapeapl]

Well what are you gonna do then in 2012?
Posted by Stuart2560 at 6:59 PM : Apr 30, 2009

I'm voting Pontiac Party.

If I haven't starved to death by then.

[weedapeapl]

Heck, you've been droppin his name for 48 hours.
Posted by gravypants at 7:02 PM : Apr 30, 2009

48 hours????? Where have you been?

[weedapeapl]

Because I'm righter than Rush.

[weedapeapl]

labels fail. Nobody ever agrees on them.
Posted by slownewsday05 at 7:00 PM : Apr 30, 2009


That's why the definition is more important than the label.

If you just disagree, then you might or might not be a liberal.

But if you delete my post, then you are a liberal.

[weedapeapl]

YOu can call it the pontiac party. GM isn't using it.
Posted by mrzerato at 6:58 PM : Apr 30, 2009

I LIKE IT!!!!!!!

[weedapeapl]

They got the idea from the first 8 years...
Posted by slownewsday05 at 6:53 PM : Apr 30, 2009

I got the idea from Madoff.

Really the Age of the Big Lie should go back twenty years.

But it wasn't really big until Clinton ignored Madoff in 2000.

So that would be the past 9 years.

I believe historians will include 2000 in the Age of the Big Lie, because that's when Madoff got reported for the first time.