Comments on: GM Slashing Production In Fight To Survive
Cash-Starved Auto Giant Tries To Save Money As Future Of Federal Bailout Hangs In Balance
- Light does slow down when going through matter. The denser, the slower (opposite of sound).
- Reply to this comment
- Is that from the perspective of an observer? Or the guy holding the flashlight? Or both?
Posted by william2970 at 09:58 PM : Nov 21, 2008
From any inertial reference frames, no matter what velocity you''re at, the speed of light is constant. - Reply to this comment
- Maybe its the same way with light.
Posted by william2970 at 09:54 PM : Nov 21, 2008
It''s not. Sound depends on the matter that it travels through. The more dense the matter, the faster the speed. Light is totally independent of that. It''s always constant whether you''re going forward or backward. It''s one of those strange properties that''s kinda hard to comprehend. - Reply to this comment
- ''The speed of light is fixed, no matter if it''''s from a standstill or from a speeding car. You cannot go faster that it (at least from what we know at present).''
Is that from the perspective of an observer? Or the guy holding the flashlight? Or both? - Reply to this comment
- When yer listening to a train go by and that whistle sound goes from high pitch to low pitch, thats because sound is speeding up as the train approaches you, and slowing down as the train moves away from you. Maybe its the same way with light.
- Reply to this comment
- But the light from a headlight of a car going 100 km/hr is going 300,000 km/sec + 100 km/hr.
Posted by william2970 at 09:48 PM : Nov 21, 2008
The speed of light is fixed, no matter if it''s from a standstill or from a speeding car. You cannot go faster that it (at least from what we know at present). - Reply to this comment
- ''The story has merit. Publish it''
Thanks. :) - Reply to this comment
- Or it could be 300,000 km/sec - 100 km/hr.
- Reply to this comment
- If you''re traveling at 99.9% the speed of light, you wouldn''t be in the same "form" you''re in now, let alone holding a flashlight and using it. There wouldn''t be a "you" to speak of.
- Reply to this comment
- ''(grin) That would mean that ''''light had no speed limit, Right?''
It would mean that 300,000 km/sec was the speed of light from a point of origin standing still. But the light from a headlight of a car going 100 km/hr is going 300,000 km/sec + 100 km/hr. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by william2970 at 09:41 PM : Nov 21, 2008
(grin) That would mean that ''light had no speed limit, Right? - Reply to this comment
- The story has merit. Publish it
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by william2970 at 09:31 PM : Nov 21, 2008
I have a question for you; If you are traveling at 99.9% the speed of light and you turn on a flashlight and shine it in your direction of travel, "What happens to the ''light'' it emits?" - Reply to this comment
- Posted by william2970 at 09:20 PM : Nov 21, 2008
With my Helmet off and my Do-Rag on I resemble Willie Nelson - Reply to this comment
- For a reference point I was born B4 WWII
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by william2970 at 09:08 PM : Nov 21, 2008
I firmly believe that ''we'' aren''t the only ones nor even the ''first'' ones. The GOD I know is big enough to have many (projects?).
How about cross-dimensional existance? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by william2970 at 09:04 PM : Nov 21, 2008
My point eggzactly! are you published ? if so ? title - Reply to this comment
- Posted by william2970 at 08:54 PM : Nov 21, 2008
It wouldn''t matter when they met us, We are so backward we will try to control them and when they resist we will fight them and then they will destroy us (rightfully so) - Reply to this comment
- we tax theirs). In the end, everything we buy costs so much more we have to raise wages for the automakers and everyone else. Wages keep going up, products get more expensive, Sounds like the 70''''s all over again, 20% interest rates on new homes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by machineguy at 08:18 PM : Nov 21, 2008--
that''s what we need, a return to the high-paying manufacturing jobs of the 70''s.
What made the economy so bad was the abandoment of the gold standard and the Bretton-Woods ''fixed-exchange-rate'' that Nixon stupidly did back in ''72.
Had he not did that then we would''ve had those high-paying manufacturing jobs without high interest rates and full prosperity like in the 50''s and 60''s.
It''s the ''debt-based'' economy stupid. - Reply to this comment
- Begin Part (2)
Now the planet is so parched that nothing can grow. Billions have already died and now they have only a few hundred left to propagate the species. Then they all boarded the only means of escape and rocketed into the skies hoping against hope that the third Planet might be able to provide a place to live. They all vowed with one voice to "Never destroy their world again". God slumped and said to himself,"WANNA BET! and a tear fell as he looked at Mars and saw the red dust covering all he had made for them?" - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.



