Comments on: Hallmark Introduces Gay Marriage Cards
Largest U.S. Greeting Card Company Says It's Responding To Consumer Demand
- Are you quoting from Webster''''''''s? Can''''''''t say I remember those definitions in there. Posted by MyOpinion381 at 03:25 PM
Try reading it then... Posted by hungry1962 at 03:29 PM
Ooh, did I hit a nerve there? By the way, I do use the "Webster''s" dictionary - practically everyday since I am the assistant to a director at my job. Still think you are referring to a different book. - Reply to this comment
- "I care because they are trying to get tax breaks for doing it. They are trying to screw up the healthcare system in this country because of it. Who gets to pay for that??
Wake up you zombie-azz libtard!"
Can you even respond to a post without hurling insults? *** pay taxes just like everyone else so of course they want the same rights you self-righteous pr.ick. Also, how are they *** up the healthcare system? - Reply to this comment
- In Massachusetts two absolute nutters (crazy Lesbians) I know got married so fast barely anyone knew they were even dating. Guess what? Divorce City!
Gloating but I can''t help it. There is something very refreshing hearing those words coming out of a woman who is talking about another woman. - Reply to this comment
Now you have gone to far. I can''''t sit by & allow you to use the word ********* in a derogatory fashion!
Both the ****** & Bag community have long been subjected to discrimination & lifestyle bashing for years and it''''s time someone stands up for thier rights as citizens of this nation. Members of the ****** & Bag community are voters too!!!
Posted by Questionnews at 03:30 PM : Aug 21, 2008
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!- Reply to this comment
- I care because they are trying to get tax breaks for doing it. They are trying to screw up the healthcare system in this country because of it. Who gets to pay for that?? Posted by hungry1962 at 03:28 PM
Just curious - how are "they" messing up the healthcare system? Wasn''t that messed up already? Whether or not g.a.y.s are a couple or separate, they are still entitled to the same healthcare as heteros.exuals. - Reply to this comment
- Any other questions, *********?
Posted by hungry1962 at 03:22 PM : Aug 21, 2008
Now you have gone to far. I can''t sit by & allow you to use the word ********* in a derogatory fashion!
Both the ****** & Bag community have long been subjected to discrimination & lifestyle bashing for years and it''s time someone stands up for thier rights as citizens of this nation. Members of the ****** & Bag community are voters too!!! - Reply to this comment
- Are you quoting from Webster''''s? Can''''t say I remember those definitions in there.
Posted by MyOpinion381 at 03:25 PM : Aug 21, 2008
Try reading it then... - Reply to this comment
- You are either an amazingly stupid person who cannot distinguish the great Olympian swimmer Phelps from the disgusting bigot pseudo-preacher Phelps--or you are a simple Troll
Posted by ofbyfor1
I KNOW that I never called you stupid, or a Troll, so whatever I AM, its pretty clear that its BETTER THAN YOU!
Posted by DaVicar2 at 02:46 PM : Aug 21, 2008
You are fully well-informed that I was responding to the fact that you
weren''t able to distinguish between the bigot Phelps and the Olympian Superstar Phelps.
I think I just outed you as a TROLL, but that doesn''t surprise me much. Have a nice night, troll. - Reply to this comment
- So who care if its not the definition of ***. If two guys want to do whatever they do in the privacy of their home than how does it affect anybody else? I could care less what they do just like I could care less what a heterosexual couple does behind closed doors.
Posted by Sparty088 at 03:25 PM : Aug 21, 2008
I care because they are trying to get tax breaks for doing it. They are trying to screw up the healthcare system in this country because of it. Who gets to pay for that??
Wake up you zombie-azz libtard! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by hungry1962 at 03:22 PM: What they are saying is stuffing your c.ock into some other dudes azz is not ***...BY DEFINITION. Homosexuality is an oxymoron, BY DEFINITION. Gay marriage is an oxymoron...BY DEFINITION.
Are you quoting from Webster''s? Can''t say I remember those definitions in there. - Reply to this comment
- "LOL....you couldn''''t be more incorrect if you tried. What they are saying is stuffing your c.ock into some other dudes azz is not ***..."
So who care if its not the definition of ***. If two guys want to do whatever they do in the privacy of their home than how does it affect anybody else? I could care less what they do just like I could care less what a heterosexual couple does behind closed doors. - Reply to this comment
- Not by MY reading of the Bible,
If you have eaten shellfish or wear clothes of mixed threads, you are just as guilty. PS- When did Jesus EVER mention gay people--answer--NEVER--he didn''''t give a hoot, although he DID mention laws from the Old Testament that HE thought were NONSENSE!
Posted by ofbyfor1 at 03:21 PM : Aug 21, 2008
You read atheist forums..not the Bible.
You wanna debate the Bible, come on over to Theologyweb.com and let''s see how good you are tardball! Let''s see if you don''t make the idiot of the month board within five minutes.
Even by atheist standards..... - Reply to this comment
- No, what they are saying, is that people that cannot reproduce cannot get married.
Posted by observer2020 at 03:11 PM : Aug 21, 2008
LOL....you couldn''t be more incorrect if you tried. What they are saying is stuffing your c.ock into some other dudes azz is not ***...BY DEFINITION.
Homosexuality is an oxymoron, BY DEFINITION.
Gay marriage is an oxymoron...BY DEFINITION.
Any other questions, *********? - Reply to this comment
- Posted by lochllan at 01:54 PM : Aug 21, 2008
You are truly a sad and patheic person.
Posted by ofbyfor1 at 02:29 PM : Aug 21, 2008
The sad thing for you is, God''''s with ME on this one.
Posted by zerrato at 02:34 PM : Aug 21, 2008
Not by MY reading of the Bible,
If you have eaten shellfish or wear clothes of mixed threads, you are just as guilty. PS- When did Jesus EVER mention gay people--answer--NEVER--he didn''t give a hoot, although he DID mention laws from the Old Testament that HE thought were NONSENSE! - Reply to this comment
- the R-Word (from that new Ben Stiller Movie)
Posted by DaVicar2 at 03:15 PM : Aug 21, 2008
Something About Mary had it way back, and no one said a da.mn word.
Everyone already knows that ret.ard already means liberal anyway. - Reply to this comment
- I hope they segregate the cards with labels like they do for "Mother''s Birthday," "Father''s Birthday," "Grandsons'' Birthday," and so on. If I''m looking for a wedding card, I don''t want to read a whole bunch of cards to figure out which ones are for straight couples, and which ones were really designed for same gender couples. So, I hope they make labels that say, "Straight Couples," "G A Y Couples, Male," and G A Y Couples, Female." Or maybe I''ll just get creative and make my own greeting cards and save the $5 it now costs to buy one; they cost too dadgummed much anyway.
- Reply to this comment
- Forget it, I won''''t get into a squirting contest with a skunk--------------------IGNORE
Posted by mensarino at 03:14 PM : Aug 21, 2008
Oh no...I been he-bi.tch slapped! - Reply to this comment
- S.ex has a single purpose....regardless of what you want s.ex to be.
Posted by zerrato at 03:07 PM : Aug 21, 2008
That''s right--S.ex has a single purpose.
To promote the sale of Viagra. It''s been that since the beginning of time. - Reply to this comment
- Forget it, I won''t get into a squirting contest with a skunk--------------------IGNORE
- Reply to this comment
- sorry, Im gonna have to disagree with ya on this one.
Posted by DaVicar2 at 03:11 PM : Aug 21, 2008
That''s fine. It''d be nice to know why though. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




