Comments on: Iran Ends Oil Transactions In U.S. Dollars

OPEC's Second-Largest Producer Now Pegs Petroleum To Euros And Yen

Add a Comment See all 103 Comments
by yongamerica April 30, 2008 6:50 PM EDT
Iran''s economy is on the brink of collapse. A iranian civil rebellion would be in full swing if it were not for an Iranian police force that larger than its army, just as well equipped, and has standing orders to kill anyone that deviates from the theocracy''s rulings. Iran rules its people in such a strict police state, it makes China seem like a western democracy.
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica April 30, 2008 6:46 PM EDT
No big deal, regardless of the product, it gets translated into a currency at an equivalent rate.
Reply to this comment
by mbcsmith April 30, 2008 6:41 PM EDT
Good, the plan is working.
Reply to this comment
by bgwinnett April 30, 2008 4:34 PM EDT
forthepeopl1. I agree the economy is going to collapse in September, and the rest -- of your fears -- will almost certainly occur, in such circumstances. However you are preaching to the blind unfortunately. I don''t think that even the country''s leaders understand how bad the situation is and how to sort it out, let alone the sheeple.
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 30, 2008 4:21 PM EDT
PEOPLE - - BEGIN TO RESEARCH and PROBE THIS ! ! ! !

SPECIAL "CLOSED SESSION" OF U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Word has begun leaking from last nights special,
Closed-door session of the United States House of Representatives.
Not only did members discuss new surveillance provisions as was the publicly stated
Reason for the closed door session, they also discussed :

1. The Imminent Collapse of the U.S. economy to occur by September 2008
2. The imminent collapse of US federal government finances by February 2009
3. The possibility of Civil War inside the USA as a result of the collapse
4. Advance round-ups of "insurgent U.S. citizens" likely to move against the Government
5. The Detention of those rounded-up at "REX 84" camps constructed throughout the USA,
6. The possibility of retaliation against members of Congress for the collapses
7. The Location of "safe facilities" for members of Congress and their families
To reside during expected massive civil unrest
8. The necessary and unavoidable merger of the United States with Canada
(for its natural resources) and with Mexico (for its cheap labor pool)
9. The issuance of a new currency - THE AMERO -
For all three nations as the proposed solution to the coming economic armageddon.

Members of Congress Have Been FORBIDDEN to reveal what was discussed
Several are so furious and concerned about the future of the country,
they have begun leaking info.
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 30, 2008 4:11 PM EDT

In Washington, the State Department said . ``
Bush is under growing American pressure to crack down on militants at the Afghan border because of fears that al-Qaida is regrouping there.
The Bush administration has also not ruled out unilateral military action inside america but like Obama, has stressed the need to work with the americans.
An aide to the president, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, bush was due to meet with Cabinet members , the attorney-general and leaders from the ruling party on Thursday to discuss whether an emergency should be declared.
He did not expect a declaration of an emergency in the early hours of Thursday.
A senior government official, who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, said bush had held several meetings Wednesday with, legal experts and top figures of the ruling party and the leaking of possible emergency plans indicated that it was a serious option.
Under our constitution, the head of state - the president - may declare a state of emergency if it is deemed that the country''s security is ``threatened by war or external aggression, or by internal disturbance beyond'''' the government''s authority to control.
If a state of emergency is to be extended beyond two months, it must be approved by a joint sitting of, the constitution says.
------


Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 30, 2008 4:10 PM EDT
United States May Declare State of Emergency


Associated Press Writer
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) %u2013 The whitehouse government of embattled President bush said Thursday it may impose a state of emergency due to ``external and internal threats'''' and deteriorating law and order.
including from Democratic presidential hopeful Barak Obama, over the possibility of U.S. military action against al-Qaida in Pakistan ``has started alarm bells ringing and has upset the Pakistani public.''''
But it appeared the motivation for a declaration of an emergency would be the domestic political woes of
President bush
During a state of emergency, the government can restrict the freedom to move, rally, engage in political activities or form groups and impose other limits such as restricting congress right to make laws or even dissolving congress
``These are only unconfirmed reports although the possibility of imposition of emergency cannot be ruled out and has recently been talked about and discussed, keeping in mind some external and internal threats and the law and order situation,bush told The Associated Press.
``I cannot say that it will be tonight, tomorrow or later. We hope that it does not happen. But we are going through difficult circumstances so the possibility of an emergency cannot be ruled out,'''' he added.
America television networks reported that a declaration of an emergency was imminent, but other senior government officials said no final decision had been made.
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 30, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
SO TELL ME WHY THE BIGGEST BUISNESS COMPANY A AMERICAN COMPANY IS STILL DOING BUISNESS WITH THEM IN IRAN???WHAT COMPANY. GENERAL ELECTRIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SO WHY CAN THEY DO IT
Reply to this comment
by chabuka-2009 April 30, 2008 3:47 PM EDT
Russia talks to Iran..you know, negotiates...Russia buys lots of oil from Iran, they have trade traties...Bush/Cheney refuses to "sit down with Iran" calls Iran "axis of evil", "evil-doers", "Islamo-fascists", etc....has carriers floating around itn the Persian gulf...threatens to "take " Irans resources...do to them what we did to Iraq... Iran resents these actions?...what ingrates..!
Reply to this comment
by enriquecaliente April 30, 2008 3:35 PM EDT
Well now, it seems that the real WMD is the devaluation of the dollar.?

How dare they.! Only the USofA has the God given right to destabilize other peoples way of life.

Where the hell is the CIA now that we need them.

Oh that''s right, their too busy here, spying on Americans, as per the Patriot Act.

Reply to this comment
by binarygirl1 April 30, 2008 3:11 PM EDT
I too am very worried about the immediate future, I saw the link to the article on whatreallyhappened.com and then verified it with Google News. This will likely be the catalyst for an engagement with the US. I am worried but hopeful for the future. If the psychopaths from Washington and Tel Aviv want a total war against humanity then this is a war that we must be prepared for. While we may or may not live in a global pathocracy there are enough normal human beings who want complicated things like: life, love, peace, food/shelter and while I think that things may get bad economically and socially for all of us irregardless of location; this entire system is based on a single premise that We the People NEED this system. This system that is manipulated and controlled by psychopaths for the benefit of a pathocracy. When we collectively realise that we do not need the system as-it-is then we can create a legitimate system of government for and by normal human beings. This is why I feel that the tyranny of the future will be short lived.

-Binary
Reply to this comment
by binarygirl1 April 30, 2008 3:10 PM EDT
I too am very worried about the immediate future, I saw the link to the article on whatreallyhappened.com and then verified it with Google News. This will likely be the catalyst for an engagement with the US. I am worried but hopeful for the future. If the psychopaths from Washington and Tel Aviv want a total war against humanity then this is a war that we must be prepared for. While we may or may not live in a global pathocracy there are enough normal human beings who want complicated things like: life, love, peace, food/shelter and while I think that things may get bad economically and socially for all of us irregardless of location; this entire system is based on a single premise that We the People NEED this system. This system that is manipulated and controlled by psychopaths for the benefit of a pathocracy. When we collectively realise that we do not need the system as-it-is then we can create a legitimate system of government for and by normal human beings. This is why I feel that the tyranny of the future will be short lived.

-Binary
Reply to this comment
by binarygirl1 April 30, 2008 3:08 PM EDT
I too am very worried about the immediate future, I saw the link to the article on whatreallyhappened.com and then verified it with Google News. This will likely be the catalyst for an engagement with the US. I am worried but hopeful for the future. If the psychopaths from Washington and Tel Aviv want a total war against humanity then this is a war that we must be prepared for. While we may or may not live in a global pathocracy there are enough normal human beings who want complicated things like: life, love, peace, food/shelter and while I think that things may get bad economically and socially for all of us irregardless of location; this entire system is based on a single premise that We the People NEED this system. This system that is manipulated and controlled by psychopaths for the benefit of a pathocracy. When we collectively realise that we do not need the system as-it-is then we can create a legitimate system of government for and by normal human beings. This is why I feel that the tyranny of the future will be short lived.

-Binary
Reply to this comment
by jjarden April 30, 2008 2:35 PM EDT
Thank You ptmcinerney and bgwinnett for answering my question.

Anyone else like to weigh in?

What is happening to us, and America?...What''s to come?...How bad do you think it''''s going to get for America and the American people?


Reply to this comment
by cfarer43 April 30, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
An attack on Iran has been planned by the US since the release of the "Project for a New American Century in 1997 the Project for the New American Century is a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership. The Project is an initiative of the New Citizenship Project (501c3); the New Citizenship Project''s chairman is William Kristol and its president is Gary Schmitt.

Part of the "project is to usurp leadership in the Middle East. With Iran''s meteoric rise to power in that region, it is anathema for the US (and Israel) to sit back and watch the changing of the guard.

Bush and his handler Israel react with bomb first and ask questions later. WMD?


Reply to this comment
by cfarer43 April 30, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
An attack on Iran has been planned by the US since the release of the "Project for a New American Century in 1997 the Project for the New American Century is a non-profit, educational organization whose goal is to promote American global leadership. The Project is an initiative of the New Citizenship Project (501c3); the New Citizenship Project''s chairman is William Kristol and its president is Gary Schmitt.

Part of the "project is to usurp leadership in the Middle East. With Iran''s meteoric rise to power in that region, it is anathema for the US (and Israel) to sit back and watch the changing of the guard.

Bush and his handler Israel react with bomb first and ask questions later. WMD?


Reply to this comment
by random_radar April 30, 2008 1:58 PM EDT
I wish I could get paid in Euros. At least they are still worth something.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 April 30, 2008 1:27 PM EDT
We can''''t keep pushing around other nations and expect them to just stand there and take it.

Posted by concorde5 at 10:16 AM : Apr 30, 2008




That''s America''s foreign policy that we picked up from Israel.

***** in the face of your enemies, in an effort to force them to adhere to your demands.

It''s a policy that''s been failing for 60 years in Israel, so Bush thought he''d give it a shot.
Reply to this comment
by concorde5 April 30, 2008 1:16 PM EDT
I applaud Iran for finally making the depreciating dollar an real issue and secondly for standing up to the US.

We can''t keep pushing around other nations and expect them to just stand there and take it.
Reply to this comment
by ptmcinerney April 30, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
This is all a bit doom and gloom :( It is the gross protectionism of the US that has lead to her apparent paralysis. To play on an equal playing field requires adhering to a common set of rules. The same applies to global economics. While the rest of the world is getting on with the game, the US is relying on the good old imperialist approach rather like the approach she used in the 19th century (think Cuba and Haiti...ever wonder why they are so messed up?). The only way out is the US''s proactive engagement in internationally agreed institutions and treaties...this would, however, require debate, diplomacy, argument and compromise...things, like oil, that seem to be in very short supply.
Reply to this comment
See all 103 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (449 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: