Comments on: Bar Assn., NRA Battle Over Guns In Cars
Groups Square Off Over Guns In Company Parking Lots
- When the police are the only people allowed to have weapons, it's called a POLICE STATE.
http://www.a-human-right.com - Reply to this comment
- %u201CWhen you get off work at 12 o'clock or 1 o'clock and you're driving home, you have the right to protect yourself if you're accosted on the highway,%u201D said Wayne LaPierre, the NRA's executive vice president
YEAH, everyone should carry a gun in their car!! DURN RIGHT!! In fact, everyone should carry a machine gun in their car!! CAN YOU SAY ROAD RAGE?? No need for law enforcement, let's SHOOT IT OUT IN THE STREETS!! I have the right to protect myself from rude drive-thru employees at McDonalds. BRING IT ON you smart-mouthed little freedon-fry toten b*tch!! - Reply to this comment
- hit list at school!!!!!! seems to me that parents are to blame with this picture. teachers cannot keep control of the students these days because they were not taught respect at home. don't make idle threats when it comes to disiplining your children. don't let little john cry his way out of disipline be firm and don't sway back and forth. they must understand that there are penalties for their actions. maybe they will not grow up to be these fanatics that carry guns to work and lose their mind. i seriously hope that the penalties for these list at these 3 schools are strong enough and fair enough to get the message across.
when you get back and look at some of these things most of which could have been fixed at home without congress. - Reply to this comment
- Taking a look at several of the previous postings should make it abundantly clear why employers should have the right to forbid weapons on thier property. The most polite term I can think of is "gun toting fanatics".
Could be an opportunity for making a ton of money. Somewhere on the same block as these major employers just buy a building, put in a gravel lot and stick a bunch of lockers inside. Under-pay one of these yahoos to stand at a counter and charge these people 5 bucks a week to lock up thier guns.
Stop whining long enough to think. - Reply to this comment
- if in general, people would be courteous to one another then most of the gun issues may not even exist. the key word is PEOPLE, the guns did not get up on the wrong side of the bed, the PEOPLE did and people are the problem. all of the bureaucrats in the world cannot fix the one problem at hand and that is the dishonest people with guns. if they take mine, it is because i give it to them. so that makes me a law abiding citizen that puts all faith in the Lord and our government that apparently doesn't believe in God anymore.
- Reply to this comment
- Some "battle", huh? If the NRA has all the guns, why aren't they using them against the ABA in this epic battle that surely will determine the fate of all free men and creatures great and small.
Lock'n'Load, Baby!...Fire in the hole!, Yea, baby...Don't you just love the smell of stupidity in the morning? - Reply to this comment
Prevent workers from defending themselves etc.
What a load of garbage.
If that were in any way true, it could only be a sad reflection of the depths that American society has sunk to.- Reply to this comment
- Sure, prevent workers from defending themselves, and permit those who would disobey the law to carry out 'ballistic' at-work crimes with immunity they know they will certainly have - (they know they won't be shot by other employees) - All in the name of 'protecting' workers!!!
Seems this is a 'first step' to putting a stop to all concealed-carry permits.
Besides, although the vehicle is on company property, the vehicle does not belong to the company, and the company has absolutely no responsibility for it - it belongs to the employee. The company would not be liable if the parking brake fell off a car, and it hit another in the parking lot.
It's just another ploy for employers to stick noses into private matters of employees (whom the company would be nonexistent without) under the guise of 'saftey', - Reply to this comment
- This is a free country and as an employer you should be able to decide what is on your property. There are pros and con to every situation. I would not work for any one that did not allow me to keep a firearm in my vehicle safely stored. I doubt that Weyerhauser Corp, ConocoPhillips Inc and Lockheed Martin search everyones vehicle from bumper to bumper checking for firearms so it's a false sense of security just something to make you feel safe or something to save them from a really expensive lawsuit.
- Reply to this comment
- This is a free country and as an employer you should be able to decide what is on your property. There are pros and con to every situation. I would not work for any one that did not allow me to keep a firearm in my vehicle safely stored. I doubt that Weyerhauser Corp, ConocoPhillips Inc and Lockheed Martin search everyones vehicle from bumper to bumper checking for firearms so it's a false sense of security just something to make you feel safe or something to save them from a really expensive lawsuit.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




