Comments on: U.S., Iraq Eye Troop Exit By End Of 2011

Both Nations Agree On Timetable For U.S. Military Departure, But Deal Still Incomplete

[jmurrieta1]

"Rice declined to talk about specifics, but U.S. officials said more work is needed to reach agreements on a timeline for U.S. troop withdrawals, immunity for U.S. troops and the handling of Iraqi prisoners. "

Not to mention the distribution of oil revenues.

In other words, the same four issues that Iraq has dug their heels in for despite pressure from Condee Puppetmaster.

And the press once again got suckered by the Bush-Cheney regime. Aren''t there any real reporters left?--or just brownnosing a$$licking operatives?

[misha128-2009]

President Bush and Sec''y of State Condi Rice are negotiating the Republican''s and Senator McCain''s dreaded "Time Line of Failure".

M4eanwhile Senator McCain agrees it may be time to reinstitute the draft so he has adequate troops to chase Bin Laden to the "Gates of Hell". Could he be planning excursions through Iran and against the Russians in Georgia before focusing on afghanistan and the the Al Qaeda sanctuaries somewhere near the mythical Iraq - Pakistan border?

[chimpyout]

Just wondering whether timdgrim timely and catchy lyric is intended to be sung to the tune of "Davy--Davy Crockett--King of the Wild Frontier."
(Specify if other)

[tapsettle]

I clearly understand HIS points, why are we in Iraq still. What I do NOT understand is YOUR post! There were and still are NOT any Weapons there. There was NO connection with the attack on us, so exactly why are we there? They don''''t want us, it''''s obvious they are NOT going to govern as we would like and they are going to ally themselves with Iran. ANY fool should be able to understand that so why are we still there? Sieg Heil McSlime
Posted by MCVet-1

I couldn''t agree with you more, in fact I usually agree with you. Just didnt understand oledakota point. In fact I still dont see the point even after reading your explanation. I probably agree with you both, just cant see oledakota ''s point.

[mcvet-1]

Nice post, but do you think you may have missed something ... like a point?

Posted by tapsettle at 06:25 AM : Aug 21, 2008

I clearly understand HIS points, why are we in Iraq still. What I do NOT understand is YOUR post! There were and still are NOT any Weapons there. There was NO connection with the attack on us, so exactly why are we there? They don''t want us, it''s obvious they are NOT going to govern as we would like and they are going to ally themselves with Iran. ANY fool should be able to understand that so why are we still there? Sieg Heil McSlime

[timdgrim]

She''s probably over in Iraq to check on the oil money (79 Billion) that Iraq has stacked up in foreign banks and wants to know when George, D*ck and her are going to get their cut.

She''s doing the dealings across the sea...
For King George and Satan Cheney....
She''s the Secretary of State you see...
She''s Kindasleezy!!...

[tapsettle]

If the Iraqis woke up one morning, and the entire US Militry force was gone, there would be no need for negoiations. 5 Years war in Iraq!! Shame. There is a country out there right now, that could have had an Iraqi unconditional surrender in FIVE WEEKS!
Posted by oledakota

Nice post, but do you think you may have missed something ... like a point?

[aztecdakota]

If the Iraqis woke up one morning, and the entire US Militry force was gone, there would be no need for negoiations. 5 Years war in Iraq!! Shame. There is a country out there right now, that could have had an Iraqi unconditional surrender in FIVE WEEKS!

[tapsettle]

Time to get out of Iraq. New destination_ _ _Russia.
Posted by whiskyrokkr

Yep, and grab some phrasebooks while you''re there as you will be needing to speak the language soon.

[tapsettle]

Finally, a WMD in Iraq ... Rice, the Woman of Mass Deception.

[ajaxtheleast]

"On Wednesday U.S. Secretary Of State

Condoleezza Rice and her Polish

counterpart",,, Delentcic Kraznisky,

who also lies, lies about lieing and

has an illegal war crime invasion of

a sovereign country to her credit,,,,,

[toldyouso12]

Who could come to America, shoot, bomb and imprison Americans, even torture Americans as an Army and then get immunity as a military? There is so much hypocrisy in this. If a country is sovereign, that means they rule themselves--they decides who enters their country, who can stay, who leaves and they mete out punishments according to their own laws, not the law of the visitors.

Our mouth may say "guest" and "helpers" and "heroes" but we are occupiers and oppressors. We can say we will only stay until they want us to go--but our insistence in staying proves we lied.

The deal is--we are invaders...in the 21st century. We are there based on lies. The present regime with many people (including Al Maliki ) were NEVER elected by the people and are collaborators with us. To collaborate with the enemy or invades requires them to commit treason to their own people for power or money.

We can paint this war, our intentions and acts every color under the rainbow--in the end, no matter the spin--some things stand glaringly out--if a country is sovereign, leaving is not negotiated--it is dictated and the "guests" get the fvck out.

Stop the lies. They, more than any other aspect are demoralizing us.

[haoli25]

The Robo-Ho is everywhere!

[whiskyrokkr]

Time to get out of Iraq. New destination_ _ _Russia.

[alphaa10-2009]

CBS News reports pointed Rice comments on withdrawal negotiations, "Ultimately the prime minister has to make the call on moving forward," Rice said.
---

In other words, it''s all al Maliki''s fault.

For his part, the Iraqi PM should be careful to conceal that sardonic sneer, as he "negotiates" his sovereign country''s freedom from US cccupation-- aka, he has Big Oil and Bush exactly where he wants them. Even al Sadr has quieted down, lest he upset these most fruitful negotiations.

Meanwhile, hoping to remind us of their intense "patriotism"-- the same kind that blindly endorsed the Bush fraud that led this country into Iraq-- many GOP bozos are backtracking desperately from their weasel words of the past.

No longer autonomically reciting their old (six months ago?) pledge, "No Surrender! Down with Defeatocrats!" Instead, it''s now, "The Surge Worked! Time to go home now, right, Mr. McBush?"

Meanwhile, McBush, ever the tough negotiator, is holding out for another 100 years.

[rushliberal]

Obama has the Republicans Running Scared! Rice to broker withdrawal agreement - Bushit!

This is just a smoke screen to help McBush get elected and then pull one of those Republican -


I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I%u2019m not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.

Now that''s should be the Republican Motto.