Comments on: July Sees Lowest U.S. Death Toll In Iraq
10 Troop Deaths Confirmed; Death Tolls For Iraqis Also Keep Falling Amid Security Gains
Add a Comment See all 125 Comments
- That''s because al Qaeda has moved to Pakistan and Afghanistan and set up home there. Most insurgents in Iraq are dead, already. Thanks for the freedom and democracy, George!
- Reply to this comment
- Kennedy & Johnson''s Vietnam war: Over 50,000 US soldiers dead.
Bush''s Iraq war: 4000 US soldiers dead.
Historically, Vietnam will be viewed as a far bigger fiasco than Iraq will. Anything that can be said about Bush can also be said about Kennedy & Johnson. - Reply to this comment
- Put the glass dik down....get help.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by tiddsanbeer
AAAH HA HA HA....LMAO !!! - Reply to this comment
- Posted by leftyintexas at 03:16 PM
Where exactly is all this oil we stole ? WHERE IS IT LIB ? I want to know where is the oil, that you insist Bush stole ? - Reply to this comment
- leftyintexas, it takes a mental midgets like yourself to somehow condence the Iraq conflict into something as simplistic as stealing oil. Will you commit suicide when the golden child loses in Nov? Only 172 days left of your dream, enjoy!
- Reply to this comment
- Answer: he doesn''''t give a rat''''s A$$ about our troops.
Posted by mbcsmith at 02:14 PM : Aug 01, 2008
You are right. DUMBYA doesn''t give a rat''s A$$ about our troops. If he did, he wouldn''t have invaded Iraq for no other reason than to steal their oil at the cost of over 4,000 U.S. troops killed and many thousands permanently injured. So tell us again why you support DUMBYA? Only 172 days left! Enjoy! - Reply to this comment
- Spinliberal
Absolutely nothing - Reply to this comment
- The Iraqis are seeing the improved security and political reconcilliation that comes from standing up on their own to defend themselves - thanks to our men and women of the U.S. Armed Forces - and a return to a free and democratic life not seen in 40 years.
The liberals that slandered our troops and leaders, and begged to run away from the fight, will have to crawl back into their spider holes and hide for the rest of their lives, never to be heard from again. - Reply to this comment
- tiddsanbeer - it is so fun bringing out the wayward on this message board.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/afghanistan.asp - Reply to this comment
- The reason foreignors come here, is so they won''''t have to become a prostitute or drug dealer in their homeland to survive. We have not done enough to express compassion for their refugee status
Posted by Pensacola88 at 01:44 PM : Aug 01, 2008
========================
I don''t think most people object to immigrants coming to America, they just want them to do it through the existing legal channels. Now if the laws need to be changed, then that''s a job for Congress. - Reply to this comment
- I can understand why O''''Bummer Hussein did not want to shake hands with our American soldiers....
He was nervous...
I mean, after all, those same soldiers have been busy fighting-killing ENEMY soldiers...half of ''''em named "Hussien"...
Posted by tiddsanbeer at 02:22 PM : Aug 01, 2008
So you apparently think that he SHOULD have made a media circus of the wounded troops, to bolster his presidential campaign?
Sorry, using the troops as nothing more than props is a GOP tactic - NOT Obama''s.
By the way, Chuck Hagel and Barrack Obama DID VISIT wounded troops in both Iraq AND Afghnaistan - they just didn''t make a media circus out of it. - Reply to this comment
- LIBS don''''t give a shiite about our troops.
Posted by mbcsmith at 02:14 PM : Aug 01, 2008
========================
That''s because they consider our military to be just a bunch of sadistic killers. - Reply to this comment
- LIBS don''''t give a shiite about our troops. The only time they are mentioned by LIBS is some sick moron.org/code pink talking point.
Why couldn''''t Nobama take the time to visit our wounded soldiers in Germany?
Answer: he doesn''''t give a rat''''s A$$ about our troops.
Posted by mbcsmith at 02:14 PM : Aug 01, 2008
If the libs don''t care about the troops, then why don''t we change our position to match McCain / Bush''s plans to leave them mired in a war forever?
Leaving them in Iraq is the WORST possible thing you can do to the troops, and obviously if we don''t want them there, then obviously WE support the troops, while you neo cons that want them to stay there and keep dying, apparently could care less either way. - Reply to this comment
- Over 4100 dead American soldiers may be just a "talking point" to you, Bush, and McCain, but you shouldn''''t try to marginalize their deaths just to support your failure of a candidate.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry1968 at 02:10 PM : Aug 01, 2008
LIBS don''t give a shiite about our troops. The only time they are mentioned by LIBS is some sick moron.org/code pink talking point.
Why couldn''t Nobama take the time to visit our wounded soldiers in Germany?
Answer: he doesn''t give a rat''s A$$ about our troops. - Reply to this comment
- Al-Qada is everywhere, dipshiits!!! So, I ask you this. If 9/11 happened and Bin Laden orchestrated it in Canada, would you dummy liberals advocate attacking Cananda?
God, you liberals are so fuuucking stupid. No wonder why you lose everything.....
Posted by poopus123 at 01:57 PM : Aug 01, 2008
How many al Qaeda terrorists were in Iraq, BEFORE we made Iraq a safe haven for them?
And what are you going to do when al Sadr''s cease fire ends this month, and the violence starts all over again? Marginalize the troops deaths again? - Reply to this comment
- 6 years of war, half a million dead including 4200 Americans, 600 billon dollars, oil at $141 a barrel and this idiot calls liberals "dummy"
Posted by PVperson
HAHAHAHAH. Hey dummy. It''''s 5 years of war so far. But, at any rate.......did you come up with those talking points all by yourself, or, are you just regurgitating what you hear on the news?
Posted by poopus123 at 01:44 PM : Aug 01, 2008
Those aren''t "talking points" little boy - those are called "facts".
Over 4100 dead American soldiers may be just a "talking point" to you, Bush, and McCain, but you shouldn''t try to marginalize their deaths just to support your failure of a candidate. - Reply to this comment
- poopus, your an idiot. Addled brained morons like you are why this country is in the shape it is. Bet you voted for Bush both times, didn''t you, Jackass.
Only thing factual you ever write is your name, poopus, how appropriate. - Reply to this comment
- poopus123, we invaded in March of 2003, it''''s over 5 years now and still running or do you think it''''s going to end today, also your forgetting Afghanistan, October of 2001. I still stand on 6 years of war, dummy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by PVperson
PV (Papilloma Virus) Person -- I still advocate that you''re a dummy. Thank God you''re not the one making the decisions for the U.S. - Reply to this comment
- poopus123, we invaded in March of 2003, it''s over 5 years now and still running or do you think it''s going to end today, also your forgetting Afghanistan, October of 2001. I still stand on 6 years of war, dummy.
- Reply to this comment
- "Wheres Bin Laden-- In Pakistan and Afghanistan stooping his harem"
Posted by fedupwithit1
I know what most men would do with a harem, but what is involved in "stooping" a women?? Is that code for something CBS wouldn''t allow to be posted? - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.
