Comments on: Bush Admin. "Silent" On Iraq Corruption
Former State Dept. Officials Tell Senate Democrats U.S. Ignored Corruption To Protect Al-Maliki
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. That was the best one all week.
- Reply to this comment
- notblue,,,, What happened to the evidence that was supposed to be delivered by our military yesterday of Iran supplying the insurgents with munitions ???
From what I heard, weapons experts examined the matrial & found none of it was Iranian.... I''m waiting for more verification on that. - Reply to this comment
- Remember this one:
The BUSHIE FAMILY STARTED WHEN 41 PHARTED AND NOW THEY ARE ALL TARDED THE BUSHIE FAMILYEE. - Reply to this comment
- [bonjersey, what country was represented by the 911 atackers and was that the agenda ofthe countryor where the attackers driven by ideology with no specific allegiance to a specific country? can you answer that? Then tell me if your question even makes sense?]
[Posted by notblue at 05:38 PM : May 13, 2008]
first off ... you didn''t answer the question. here it is again ... did saddam have anything to do with 9/11?
it''s not that hard to answer ... unless of course, answering it blows your idiotic rants out of the water.
then loan me your secret decoder ring for the babble you responded with.
16 of the 19 hijackers were saudi. - Reply to this comment
- 41 or 43, Who cares.
All Bushies will be out of the White House VERY SOON and will be back in CRAWFORD TEXAS IN THEIR BIG BUSHIE GROUP HOME FULL OF TARDS. - Reply to this comment
- As we speak, India is experiancing terrorist attacks, & Iran is delivering evidence to the UN of our participation in terrorist attacks within Iran
- Reply to this comment
- (AP) The Bush administration repeatedly ignored corruption at the highest levels within the Iraqi government and kept secret potentially embarrassing information so as not to undermine its relationship with Baghdad, according to two former State Department employees.
********************************************
What a surprise...not. This is the most corrupt, evil, damaging, administration that the US has had in its history, so what else would you expect from it. There is absolutely nothing Bush could do that would surprise me, other than act like a decent human being. - Reply to this comment
- That was Bush 41 not 43
Both ICKY Douschbag numbers. - Reply to this comment
- notblue,,,, You go fck yourself for aiding the enemy & encouraging the failures in the War on Terror
- Reply to this comment
- bonjersey, what country was represented by the 911 atackers and was that the agenda ofthe countryor where the attackers driven by ideology with no specific allegiance to a specific country? can you answer that? Then tell me if your question even makes sense?
Posted by notblue at 05:38 PM : May 13, 2008
This is why the war on terror is ridiculous. They were INDIVIDUALS that attacked and not nation=states. Obviously not justified in the context GW put it in....again, dumb and arrogant. - Reply to this comment
- bonjersey, what country was represented by the 911 atackers and was that the agenda ofthe countryor where the attackers driven by ideology with no specific allegiance to a specific country? can you answer that? Then tell me if your question even makes sense?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by notblue at 05:38 PM : May 13, 2008
It was done by a bunch of religious fanatics recruited by Al Queda, a bunch of mercenaries created by the United States, in the Afghani/Russian war.
Didn''t really have anything to do with religious extremes, the fanatics were used by the mercenaries to do it. - Reply to this comment
- Yea Bushies and his Administration are Silent because of the mis-management. Bush the ****
- Reply to this comment
- artl, the reason Sadam was removed from power was that the vast majority of Americans on both sides of the isle felt he was a THREAT. Can you grasp that concept? JUst because you are a hindsite genious does not make the original rational wrong. Why is that so hard for you politically driven haters to comprehend?
Posted by notblue at 05:36 PM : May 13, 2008
I''m against it because it was politically stupid and economically stupid. If you''re dead set on removing all bad people from leadership positions, we may as well invade and take half of Africa, Pakistan, Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and many more......why is one more significant than another.....or do we need to try other options. Again, Saddam was a bad guy, but Bush 41 realized he served a purpose and left him in power. Clinton did the same....too bad that much of what 41 predicted has come true under his son....very sad. - Reply to this comment
- notblue,,, We went into Iraq based on single source intel from political despots & none of it was verifiable,,, In fact info that they were not credible was immediatly dismissed, & it all was driven by this White House & Cheney''s people in the Pentagon.
- Reply to this comment
- j-whitless, as usual you could just as well go fck yourself copy and paste a few more of Bin Ladens speaches while your at it, see my middle finger it''s all for you.
- Reply to this comment
- notblue,,, That was Bush 41 not 43 who attacked because Sadam Attacked and sacked neigboring Kuwait. Any other questions?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by j-whitman at 05:36 PM : May 13, 2008
Bush 41 didn''t care about the Kuwaiti''s...he just wanted to protect the oil fields where US oil producers have all those PSA agreements.
Had he invaded another country that didn''t have oil, he''d have sat on his hands and hoped they killed each other. - Reply to this comment
- bonjersey, what country was represented by the 911 atackers and was that the agenda ofthe countryor where the attackers driven by ideology with no specific allegiance to a specific country? can you answer that? Then tell me if your question even makes sense?
- Reply to this comment
- artl, the reason Sadam was removed from power was that the vast majority of Americans on both sides of the isle felt he was a THREAT. Can you grasp that concept? JUst because you are a hindsite genious does not make the original rational wrong. Why is that so hard for you politically driven haters to comprehend?
- Reply to this comment
- notblue,,, That was Bush 41 not 43 who attacked because Sadam Attacked and sacked neigboring Kuwait. Any other questions?
- Reply to this comment
- notblue,,,, Bush took power by force & corruption of our election process & our Supreme Court
- Reply to this comment




