Comments on: Al-Sadr To Followers: Refuse Surrender
As U.S., British Forces Join Basra Offensive, Militants Reject Call To Disarm; 2 U.S. Troops Killed in Baghdad
- [AND IN MY OPINION THOSE WHO KEEP ONSPEWING A HATRED OF AMERICA ARE BETRAYERS AND COWARDS!]
[Posted by dumbshun at 06:42 AM : Mar 30, 2008]
your opinion is likely rooted in some deep psychological imbalance. the all caps thing is probably just a stuck caps lock key. the later is easy to cure ... the former may be more involved. - Reply to this comment
- Correction, "sociopathic"...
- Reply to this comment
- "alJazeera would be having a field day, but they are not, because what you claim is a blatant lie. Better luck next time." Posted by yongamerica
So am I to take it that you watch Al Jazeera enough to know what hey do and don''t show? Outside of the US, Al Jazeera daily shows images and reports stories of American atrocities, some questionable as to the real perpetrators, most clearly supported by evidence.
If you are in the US, you won''t see them, because those people who do control the mass media stateside are complicit not to show the realities of what goes on in an illegal war, lest your hero Bush and his supporters be shown for the sociopathathic butchers they are. - Reply to this comment
- This is the current situation. Iraq is in the beginnings of full civil war - mostly the government againist the militia. Troops continue to defect to al-Sadr and this will continue for a number of reasons but mostly because the government is heavily infiltrated by al-Sadr''s men. al-Sadr controls the major government departments such as health, he is much more respected than Maliki by his people, he has international support whereas Maliki does not (except us). The list goes on and on.
Questions: Why are we backing Maliki in this civil war? Why are we backing anybody? - Reply to this comment
- This is the current situation. Iraq is in the beginnings of full civil war - mostly the government againist the militia. Troops continue to defect to al-Sadr and this will continue for a number of reasons but mostly because the government is heavily infiltrated by al-Sadr''s men. al-Sadr controls the major government departments such as health, he is much more respected than Maliki by his people, he has international support whereas Maliki does not (except us). The list goes on and on.
Questions: Why are we backing Maliki in this civil war? Why are we backing anybody? - Reply to this comment
- yongamerica wrote:
"I see your translation book doesn''''t include the coloquilism settle down. Shall I spell it out for you s l o w l y?"
Hmmm - if you''re going to use a big word, at least spell it correctly.
Otherwise you just look like an idiot.
Here''s a hint: colloquialism
By the way, you actually wrote "Settle down down" - if you can''t proof read your own postings, then don''t bother accusing other people of not understanding your ramblings. - Reply to this comment
- "if what you say actually occurred there''''d be some cool pictures on the internet. alJazeera would be having a field day, but they are not, because what you claim is a blatant lie. Better luck next time." Posted by yongamerica
In the time since you posted that BS, I hope you did a Google search on Iraq atrocities committed by the US army. There are millions of pages to choose from, from the delightful (to people like yourself) photos of children with limbs freshly blown off, to the atrocities at Abu Ghraib, which someone of your bent would probably find very "stimulating".
"If what I say actually occurred there"...? Huh?
Son, there is so much verifiable evidence of US committed atrocities that only a psychopath could pretend that it doesn''t exist, and only people of similar mental instability would try to justify it. - Reply to this comment
- yongamerica wrote:
"mcdazz - you have no argument, only anger. See you forgot you were the first to start slinging insults and all you did was make an Azz out of yourself. keep up the good work."
I see that you''re not above telling lies or making things up.
Interesting.
But here''s a reminder for you.
"yongamerica at 04:59 AM - mcdazz - having troubles with your Khuzestani Arabic to English dictionary?"
How sad your life must be. - Reply to this comment
- "If al Qaeda were a figment of the CIA''''s imagination, then why does alJzeera print every word from its leaders? Is this because alJazeera is run by the CIA too?" Posted by yongamerica
Yes. it was originally set up as an Arabic language version of CNN, to promote the interests of the west to the Arabic speaking world. Its original funding came from the US. - Reply to this comment
- I see your translation book doesn''t include the coloquilism settle down. Shall I spell it out for you s l o w l y?
- Reply to this comment
- I found a picture of yongamerica - http://www.outdoorphotography.com/index.php?q=node/1 .
- Reply to this comment
- mcdazz - you have no argument, only anger. See you forgot you were the first to start slinging insults and all you did was make an Azz out of yourself. keep up the good work.
- Reply to this comment
- yongamerica wrote:
"mcdazz - resorting to name calling makes your views and comments so much more credible. Settle down down, I know even little english words make your head hurt. Look up credible in your translation book and color it sarcastic. I can wait while you thumb through the pages."
Name calling? Where did I call you a name? I merely suggested that perhaps your English Comprehension would improve if you removed your head from your a$$.
That''s hardly name calling.
And gee, all that after you started with the insults and accused me of not speaking English?
Clearly, you''re a little confused, and very, very hypocritical.
Maybe if you removed your head from your a$$, you wouldn''t be so confused?
Hmmmm, and what on earth did you mean by "Settle down down"?
I''m guessing English isn''t your native language - perhaps it''s you who is resorting to an English translation book? - Reply to this comment
- the Iraqis do not want us there... ok, lets leave - we shouldn''t have been there in the first place...
- Reply to this comment
- Feelfree1 - go educate yourself
http://aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/F06E0D8B-BE98-445A-9752-8E7EA9DAD30F.htm - Reply to this comment
- If al Qaeda were a figment of the CIA''s imagination, then why does alJzeera print every word from its leaders? Is this because alJazeera is run by the CIA too?
- Reply to this comment
yongamerica,
You can educate yourself here:
www.ivaw.org
Ask your minder for help.- Reply to this comment
- nocatnowaco wrote:
"Remember Iraq will be under Iran or Syria and other countries. If you are an Iraqi, would you like that ???"
Actually, Shiites have an exceptionally close relationship with Iran - and as we have seen, al-Maliki is also a friend of the Iranians.
Given the choice between Iran and the US, I''m sure most Iraqis would choose Iran over the US any day. - Reply to this comment
- mcdazz - resorting to name calling makes your views and comments so much more credible. Settle down down, I know even little english words make your head hurt. Look up credible in your translation book and color it sarcastic. I can wait while you thumb through the pages.
- Reply to this comment
- Re: "If the Americans leave, all this fighting will stop...it is time to go home."
What fairy book have you been reading? This isn''t a happily ever after fairy tale. The infighting will worsen and the Iranians, Syrians and Arabs will join in. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




