Comments on: Deadly Clashes Break Out In Basra, Baghdad

Iraqi Leaders Face Grave Shiite Crisis As U.S. And Iraqi Troops Battle Militia Loyal To Al-Sadr

Add a Comment See all 298 Comments
by huanaco March 26, 2008 12:14 AM EDT

GENTLEMEN ALL : THERE IS NO LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL . HOW IN HELL WE ARE GOING TO WIN A WAR THAT THE SOLDIER DON,T FEEL THEY BELONG TO ?
Reply to this comment
by ioweign March 26, 2008 12:11 AM EDT
P.S. The K.K.K. was legal.

Posted by nrgmizer at 06:51 PM : Mar 25, 2008


So was the Republican Party...

Reply to this comment
by denn034 March 26, 2008 12:09 AM EDT
QUESTION: Why would the Shiite Iran give the Sunni al Qaida missiles to use against the U.S. knowing that the Sunni al Qaida would use any remaining missiles against it''s Iraq Shiites after the U.S. leave?
Reply to this comment
by baghdadshere March 25, 2008 11:57 PM EDT
%u201CWe call on the U.S. to get out of Iraq %u2014 not in six months, not in a year, but now.%u201D

www.ipetitions.com/petition/Out
Now

Posted by FeelFree1 at 07:59 PM : Mar 25, 2008

FellFree1,,,,We all know you are a jihadist Muslim female proud of being raped/stoned/lashed. But your old rhetoric and antiwar-propaganda doesnt work. Trip back to your al-qaeda compound in the remote Pakistan/Afghanistan border bcause GWB doesnt care for your insignificant postings.
Reply to this comment
by joyous88 March 25, 2008 11:32 PM EDT
mission accomplished

the neo cons want to destroy government;

so the are spending america to death

see, the surge is working;

republiCONs are filth, UnAMERICAN filth.
Reply to this comment
by apprxam March 25, 2008 11:20 PM EDT
nrgmizer....I''m sure Cheney would get a deferment, even from cyberSpace. Because he''s a ChickenSh*t coward. Sooooooooooooo!
Reply to this comment
by firststate March 25, 2008 11:17 PM EDT
Just a reminder that the Iraqi civil war isn''t over.
Reply to this comment
by apprxam March 25, 2008 11:13 PM EDT
Goodnight, all. I''m gonna go to another page and make fun of Dumbocrats.
Reply to this comment
by apprxam March 25, 2008 11:10 PM EDT
The question is: Who''d get his *ss first. Iraqis, Al Qaeda or a vestless, armourless U.S. Marine.
Reply to this comment
by apprxam March 25, 2008 11:06 PM EDT
Someone should drop Rumsfeld, *** out-butt naked, seven blocks from the green zone at 11:00AM with Cheney''s passport and Bush''s 30"X 20" picture tied around his neck. One gun, one bullet (Light and mobile force).
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 March 25, 2008 10:59 PM EDT

%u201CWhy we stand for immediate withdrawal of all US troops from Iraq%u201D

%u201CTHE U.S. occupation of Iraq has not liberated the Iraqi people, but has made life worse for most Iraqis.%u201D

%u201CTens of thousands of U.S. service people have been killed or maimed, and hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis have lost their lives as a result of the U.S. invasion in 2003, the ongoing occupation, and the violence unleashed by them.%u201D

%u201CIraq''s infrastructure has been destroyed, and U.S. plans for reconstruction abandoned. There is less electricity, less clean drinking water, and more unemployment today than before the U.S. invasion.%u201D

%u201CAll of the justifications initially provided by the U.S. for waging war on Iraq have been exposed as lies; the real reasons for the invasion %u2014 to control Iraq''s oil reserves and to increase U.S. strategic influence in the region %u2014 now stand revealed.%u201D

%u201CThe Bush administration has insisted again and again that stability, democracy, and prosperity are around the next bend in the road%u2026But the U.S. has deliberately stoked sectarian divisions in its ongoing attempt to install a U.S.-friendly regime, thus driving Iraq towards civil war.%u201D

%u201CWe call on the U.S. to get out of Iraq %u2014 not in six months, not in a year, but now.%u201D

www.ipetitions.com/petition/OutNow
Reply to this comment
by apprxam March 25, 2008 10:56 PM EDT
Gordon Brown isn''t going to let Britain get caught up like Blair did. But I''m real concerned about this cease-fire agreement. The splinter factions have already been causing hell. Then Al Qaeda is gonna team up with the Sunnis. Anything to be against the U.S.
Reply to this comment
by arlt1627 March 25, 2008 10:52 PM EDT
The tenuous cease-fire is not going to hold much longer and the U.S. is going to feel pressured to kill Al Sadar and then all hell is going to break out. We might try and flush out the malitia, but I fear they''''ll hold back and keep coming intermittingly and finaly force the U.S. to choose the Sunni.

This is going to get real F*CKED UP soon. So people get ready.

Posted by apprxam
------------------
I have to agree with you. The British hate being involved in Iraq and are mostly there to support the US. The cease fire was the greatest thing ever for them. However, with new violence in the Basra region, we''ll see problems with Shiites and the Sunnis and a bunch of pressure from Great Britain too.....we''ll have to see how this turns out and how it impacts the "surge"!
Reply to this comment
by apprxam March 25, 2008 10:49 PM EDT
Here would be good news in Iraq---- Good Bye
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 March 25, 2008 10:49 PM EDT

Leave it to a regime bobble-head to view British abandonment of Basra, and the U.S. inability to patrol there, as "good news".
Reply to this comment
by apprxam March 25, 2008 10:48 PM EDT
The tenuous cease-fire is not going to hold much longer and the U.S. is going to feel pressured to kill Al Sadar and then all hell is going to break out. We might try and flush out the malitia, but I fear they''ll hold back and keep coming intermittingly and finaly force the U.S. to choose the Sunni.

This is going to get real F*CKED UP soon. So people get ready.
Reply to this comment
by the74blaster March 25, 2008 10:43 PM EDT
I know you lefties can''''t ever acknowledge good news from Iraq,

Posted by fredgrad2000,

It would be easier if you could believe the Bush adminstration says. Can you provide a single truthful statement that the Bush administration has made regarding Iraq?

Considering the facts that not a SINGLE justification for invading Iraq has withstood the test of time and proven true, do you blame us?

Do you care to comment on all those WMDs they found in Iraq?

How many trillions of dollars have been spent without any tangible return on ivestment in Iraq?

Where is the evidence that supports the claim that Saddam Hussein was allied with Al Qaeda?

How about the mission accomplished banner?

The fact is I firmly believe in the saying fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

I am proud to say that I am doing my patriotic duty and voting for change this November, even if it means voting for Hillary.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 March 25, 2008 10:43 PM EDT

"fredgrad2000" wrote:

"...there are NO US or coalition troops involved in this operation."

From the very first paragraph of the article:

"Shiite militiamen loyal to anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr...fought U.S. and Iraqi troops in Baghdad and unleashed rockets on the Green Zone."

At least this poster is consistent...consistently wrong, that is.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 March 25, 2008 10:37 PM EDT

nrgmizer,

Re: "The only good thing about war is the end of it."

Agreed.
Reply to this comment
by fredgrad2000 March 25, 2008 10:26 PM EDT
Now, is inter-Shiite fighting in Basra good news? No, of course not, but as no one here will obviously do since all our usual Daily Kos-ers are here too busy bashing Bush and the now 5-year decision to invade Iraq (which sorry, can''t be reversed unless Soros funds a time machine), let''s note some positives out of this. First, the Iraqi Army is handling this; there are NO US or coalition troops involved in this operation. Second, the operation is to end the stranglehold and influence of illegal militias (many funded by Iran of course) which even our erstwhile left-wingers have been calling for from Maliki''s gov''t; Third, this is Shiites cleaning up their own house - not sectarian strife. Lastly, Sadr''s response to all this? To call for a day of "civil disobedience" - not "martyrdom" or "jihad" or "ousting the occupiers", but "civil disobedience"; does anyone believe that one of the primary militia leaders in Iraq calling for non-violent protest rather than jihad is a BAD sign? I know you lefties can''t ever acknowledge good news from Iraq, and this isn''t Christmas news, but its evidence of action of a key point that all YOUR kind have been pressing for; action against militias, and being undertaken on the initiative of the Iraqis, by the Iraqis, and by members of the same sect on their own renegade sect members. Not such a bad thing.
Reply to this comment
See all 298 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: