Comments on: U.S. Death Toll In Iraq Hits 4,000
Casualty Milestones Are Arbitrary But Draw Attention To The Human Cost Of The War
- Who cares about impeachment! The GOP will be HURTING in the next elections!!!!
The GOP/Republican tools on these forums wouldn''t dare talk about Republicans and their failed policies. Instead they help themselves feel better about blind support for the Republicans, by attacking Democrats trying to fan the flames of dissent within the DNC.
Well now I know, a vote for a Republican is literally a vote for ignorance, and misguided spending in an unnecessary war in Iraq, which causes more hate......
Democrats ROCK!!!!!!!!!!
Obama made an amazing speech last week! I have never heard any politician speak so candidly and clearly about ANY topic, much less the state of racism in America.
MAJOR APLAUSE FOR BARRAK OBAMA!!
I like how eloquently Hillary Clinton commented and plugged him for his speech. She knows Barrack summed up the topic of racism so well, that she let it stand as is.
Very graceful of her!
I''d love to see a Republican address this subject in such a direct and intelligent way.
This country has some healing to do and Republicans just GET IN THE WAY.
This election is not about Hillary versus Obama, it''s about Democrat versus Republican.
Hillary or Obama, or both. - Reply to this comment
- How quickly the Democrats quit talking impeachment after they won control of Congress and the real estate thief, Pelosi took it off the table...those appropriations are still flowing...and they even passed a resolution that named the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a terrorist outfit which will allow Queen Bush to attack their bases in Iran...of course THAT won''t start a war, will it?
The Democratic wing of the Oligarchical Party skulks around the war like some nasty-nice little twit with a look of repulsion on his face...When the Democrat lays down his two bits to the ''ho for a poke, the noble Democrat is doing it for the ''ho''s sake, not for himself.... - Reply to this comment
- Please, someone tell where the CENTRIST Republicans are?
Many Americans today have been enlightened by the two wars we find ourselves involved. One war, the "war on terrorism", finds its main battleground in Afghanistan, and it is a war that costs lives and money but the majority of Americans support. Liberals, Democrats, Republicans, Conservatives, most don''t have a problem with us kicking down the doors of members of the Taliban.
When talking about the war in Iraq the parties have much difference. Democrats say that the public and congress was mislead to justify the war in Iraq and that the Bush Administration no longer deserves autonomy in situations where US service men and women''s lives are on the line. Based on the results of the last Congressional elections, most Americans see a problem with GOP/Republicans; at least in the way they make decisions about the use of our military.
So why is it that in the GOP/Republican party there are no dissenters, no independent thinkers, no moderates? Where are the real conservatives who would laugh at how conservatively the current Republican party has been spending taxes, and creating big government? Has the Republican Party lost its identity? Can the ideology of the GOP be so easily summed up in Karl Rove talking points like %u201Csupport this and support that%u201D, and angry rhetoric like %u201Cliberals are traitors%u201D?
Hello centrist Republicans! Anybody out there? - Reply to this comment
- Clinton backed Bush''s war...his police state acts and Clinton has the back of the Israel-first crowd that supports the war...split it with Obama. Now, suddenly, because Americans oppose the war, these poseurs are talking anti-war...Nixon had his secret plan to get us out of Vietnam...Obama has his plan full of loopholes you could drive a Buick through.
We saw what the Democrats did when they won in 2006 on opposition to the war...they supported the surge.
We saw how Israeli agent Representative Rahm Emmanuel sabotaged the anti-war Democratic candidates.
We saw how Lieberman the War Pig was endorsed by Obama, the closet War Pig in 2006.
We saw how the Democrats are getting substantial support from Wall Street and the Merchants of Death... just as LBJ did in 1964 against the ''crazy'', bomb-em-back-to-the-stone-age Barry Goldwater....
Barry was the Juan McWar of 1964...The Oligarch''s political managers are playing the presidential version of ''good cop, bad cop'' on you...though in this case it is more like ''good cop, insane cop''...
The Brzezinskis, McPeak and the Goolsby aren''t in Obama''s camp because he''s the peace candidate...they are there because they know Americans are dumber than dirt and will let them pull the wool over their eyes again. - Reply to this comment
- What???????? Nixon didn''t have a choice either, or did he?
- Reply to this comment
- getcentered--So, Nixon was an anti-war candidate afterall?
- Reply to this comment
- michaelt302,,,, I fully support our soldiers also, but, this isn''t WW2 in the least, just the opposite.
We went into WW2 to fight against a War of Agression, this time, we started one. - Reply to this comment
- Bush has had the support of the Democrates. Clinton, for instance. Obama, in 2004, said his position and that of Bush were not significantly different...all that mattered to him was who was calling the shots.
FOX, Limbaugh and the Lizard Woman are backing Hillary. Barack has the support of Lester Crown of General Dynamics, General "bomb now, die later" McPeak and his advisors are bonified War Pigs...the Brzezinskis.
I say again, we have THREE WAR PIG CANDIDATES! Some people just refuse to look behind the curtain and would rather listen to empty words and imagine that "change" means whatever they want it too mean. - Reply to this comment
- Ohhh yea, and a Dem gets my vote this round......
The GOP/Republican tools on these forums wouldn''t dare talk about Republicans and their failed policies. Instead they help themselves feel better about blind support for the Republicans, by attacking Democrats trying to fan the flames of dissent within the DNC.
Well now I know, a vote for a Republican is literally a vote for ignorance, and misguided spending in an unnecessary war in Iraq, which causes more hate......
Democrats ROCK!!!!!!!!!!
A historic day for Democrats!
Obama made an amazing speech! I have never heard any politician speak so candidly and clearly about ANY topic, much less the state of racism in America.
MAJOR APLAUSE FOR BARRAK OBAMA!!
I like how eloquently Hillary Clinton commented and plugged him for his speech. She knows Barrack summed up the topic of racism so well, that she let it stand as is.
Very graceful of her!
I''d love to see a Republican address this subject in such a direct and intelligent way.
This country has some healing to do and Republicans just GET IN THE WAY.
This election is not about Hillary versus Obama, it''s about Democrat versus Republican.
Hillary or Obama, or both. - Reply to this comment
- Prinzowhales,,,,, He didn''t say pro war canidates, he said pro war canidate & there''s only one of those McCain & actually he''s pro endless wars with no accomplishments
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




