Comments on: Violence In Iraq Kills 42; 3 More GIs Die
U.S. Death Toll For Monday Rises To 8; Bomb Hits Bus Killing 16
- The closer the election gets, the more violence there will be in IRAQ. IRAN is sending money, materials and troops to IRAQ for AL Qaeda so that Democrats can unconditionally surrender to the Terrorists as soon as they are elected. There is no better supporter of World Wide Terrorism than Democrats who could care less about IRAQ becomming the new World Headquarters for their Islamic partners.
- Reply to this comment
- The Sorrows of Young Dumus, Art. XX:
Successful crime knows nothing of satiety. Both the exhilarating momentum of conquest, and the need to distract the populace from the escape of ibn Shaitan demanded the subjugation of Mesopotamia. In this adventure, the Oligarchs inflexibly pursued two paramount objectives. The first of these was the establishment of a docile client state firmly garrisoned by the Hegemon in the very heart of Dar al-Islam. The second object, urged in part by the thirst for more energy resources (Art.XI), was the complete control of the wealth of the country by the Oligarchy. No sacrifice of the populace, however bloody, and no crime, however brutal, would deter the Oligarchs from these goals.
But at the outset, Mesopotamia appeared as a rich fruit, ripe for the plucking. The tyrant, Nur ud Din, had made himself odious to mankind by his blatant cruelties. The strangulation of Mesopotamia by the elder Dumus had impoverished the country and rendered it defenseless, while its reserves of hydrocarbon energy resources were second only to the House of Saaud. Even better, the land could be exploited as a royal demesne with much of the public revenue diverted to the imperial clique of Dumus. The gold, thus plundered, fed a cloud of delators, worm-tongues, and agents of provocation; all dedicated to the extinction of the last embers of freedom within the Hegemon. As a final advantage, Persia could be attacked from the west as well as from the north and east. - Reply to this comment
- Any time you go out there and expose the most beloved right wing myths as baseless urban legends, as Snopes.com does, you are going to draw the fire of outraged right wing fringe extremists like John Berlau.
Posted by Iceman_1960
Iceman forgot to mention that Snopes.com also support making any religious practice illegal and supports the Man-Boy Love Association and it legalization of Pedophiles. Go choice Iceman. Of course we always knew that the Atheist Communist Anything-Sexual Democrats never had an once of ethics or morality. - Reply to this comment
- why did wet willy kkklowntoon give obl a free pass???
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by terrorislam3 at 03:57 PM : Mar 11, 2008
+ report abuse
When did President Clinton PROMISE to bring him in DEAD OR ALIVE? The question is why hasn''t Bush, who DID make that promise, not found him? Sieg Heil Bush!! - Reply to this comment
- All of you look up the Jihad Folder and read it
- Reply to this comment
- WASHINGTON %u2014 A forthcoming Pentagon study has found no operational link between Saddam Hussein and Usama bin Laden''s Al Qaeda terrorist network.
McClatchy Newspapers reports that the study, expected to be released later this week, is based on an extensive review of more than 600,000 Iraqi documents that were seized after the U.S.-led war in Iraq in 2003.
While there was no link to Al Qaeda, the investigation revealed that Saddam''s regime gave some support to other terror groups in the Middle East, U.S. officials told McClatchy on condition of anonymity. But he targeted those he considered his own enemies, including Shiite Muslims, Kurds, exiles and others, the news service reported.
Sponsored by the Pentagon, the report found no "direct operational link" between Saddam''s government in Iraq and bin Laden''s Al Qaeda terror ring before the U.S. invasion, an official told McClatchy.
The Bush administration put forth the argument that there was a connection between Saddam and bin Laden when it made the case to go to war with Iraq after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States.
The Pentagon study won''t be released before Wednesday - Reply to this comment
- terrislam3,
Can I call you Terri ?
Terri, I have to go now.
You win --- But just for today. - Reply to this comment
- "Catherine Seipp did a powder puff piece on snopes,,, not an article exposing or not exposing their bias,,,
she has never done that style of reporting and is illequiped for it,,,"
- Posted by terrorislam3 at 04:33 PM : Mar 11, 2008
-----------------------
You"re funny.
It"s painful to see your most beloved myths shattered at a site that National Review Online and even the Wall Street Journal praises to the skies.
A painful experience for you.
But cheer up. "insanetroll" and "Diddle E Squat" still agree with you on every crazy right wing theory flying around the belfry. - Reply to this comment
- Any time you go out there and expose the most beloved right wing myths as baseless urban legends, as Snopes.com does, you are going to draw the fire of outraged right wing fringe extremists like John Berlau.
- Reply to this comment
- John Berlau, in turn, quotes the Wall Street Journal:
"Snopes.com offers more background information and definitive answers on the veracity of popular rumors than any other site we looked at." - Reply to this comment
- Diddle.E.Squat claimed to be quoting John Berlau, a good writer but a right wing fringe extremist who attacks the IRS and the environmental movement.
- Reply to this comment
- I quoted the article of an actual, known author at Snopes.com.
An article at National Review, I meant. About Snopes.com.
terrorislam3 is reduced to quoting anonymous posters like Diddle.E.Squat
Gimme a break... - Reply to this comment
- "you like this one better???
Online Rumor Mill Spins Its Own Myth(Snopes.com''''s leftwing bias undercuts its credibility)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-ne
ws/968235/posts "
- terrorislam3
----------------------
LMAO !!!
That''s just a glorified chatroom.
Check it out.
That"s just a post at that website, by a guy (I''m not making this up) by the anonymous screenname "Diddle E. Squat"
["Posted on 08/21/2003 4:23:10 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat]
What makes you think he knows diddley-squat about Snopes.com ????
I quoted the article of an actual, known author at Snopes.com.
LMAO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Reply to this comment
- "Why hasn"t Bush captured obl ?''
I"ll tell you why.
For his first three years in office he thought "Tora Bora" was an island in the South Pacific. - Reply to this comment
- In case anyone doesn"t know, National Review Online is a leading Conservative website.
"National Review (NR) is a biweekly magazine of political opinion, founded by author William F. Buckley, Jr. in 1955 and based in New York City. While the print version of the magazine is available online to subscribers, the web site''s free content is essentially a separate publication." - Reply to this comment
- Snopes.com praised at....
NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE !!!!
"Where Urban Legends Fall
Snopes.com, the ultimate debunker.
Many people have attacked Michael Moore''s Fahrenheit 9/11 by now; my favorite description comes from Christopher Hitchens, who called it "a load of nauseating, boring rubbish from start to finish." But long before the familiar pundits began touring the Michael Moore media circuit, urban-legend debunkers Barbara and David Mikkelson, of the indispensable Snopes.com, were on the case."
http://www.nationalreview.com/seipp/seipp200407210830.asp - Reply to this comment
- We should believe "insanetroll.blogspot.com" when they "out" Snopes.com ?????
LMAO - Reply to this comment
- Why hasn"t Bush captured obl ?
- Reply to this comment
- "snopes has long been outed for its left eingnut barking moonbat bias,,,
keep barking"
- Posted by terrorislam3 at 03:45 PM : Mar 11, 2008
-------------------
LOL
Coming from someone who uses some of the sources you use, that could be taken as a compliment. - Reply to this comment
- "The Clinton administration prosecuted those responsible and they are serving life sentences in prison."
I was of course referring to Ramzi Yousef and the Blind Sheik, Omar Abdel Rahman, and two others.
"On 26 February 1993, a car loaded with 1,200 pounds of explosives blew up in a parking garage under the World Trade Center, killing six people and injuring about a thousand others. The blast did not, as its planners intended, bring down the towers - that was finally accomplished by flying two hijacked airliners into the twin towers on the morning of 11 September 2001 [during the Bush administration].
Four followers of the Egyptian cleric Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman were captured, convicted of the World Trade Center bombing in March 1994, and sentenced to 240 years in prison each. The purported mastermind of the plot, Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, was captured in 1995, convicted of the bombing in November 1997, and also sentenced to 240 years in prison. One additional suspect fled the U.S. and is believed to be living in Baghdad." - Reply to this comment
International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more.




