Comments on: Gates Endorses Pause In Troop Drawdown
Says Now Is Good Time For "Consolidation And Evaluation"; Twin Bombing Kills 22
- Just like those who said it would take hundreds of thousands of troops (Shinseki) and those who scoffed at the administration''''s projected cost of the invasion/occupation (50 billion), and those who said that Iraq would never pay for itself, they simply refused to listen to knowlegeable people who told them the truth as opposed to what they wanted to hear.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by formrusmcsgt
WAAAAAAAH. THEY SAID THEY WOULD PUT IN 250 THOUSAND TROOPS AND THEN DIDNT. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH. THEY LIED TO ME. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH. I HATE BUSH. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH.
NOW I HAVE TO TALK WITH JWHIT TO MAKE MYSELF FEEL BETTER BY BIITCHING ABOUT BUSH BECAUSE I HATE HIM SO MUCH EVEN THOUGH THE WAR, THE ECONOMY, THE BORDER AND EVERYTHING THAT''S AN ISSUE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ME.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH I HATE BUSH. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
GROW A SET OF NUTS AND SUPPORT THE TROOPS, YOU COWARD. - Reply to this comment
- "who asked not to be identified because he did not want to alienate senior military officials."
Or be held accountable for his statement in other words... - Reply to this comment
- Posted by j-whitman at 05:24 PM : Feb 11, 2008
You''re right,J. That is a different article but still similar to one I read some time back on the matter.... - Reply to this comment
- formrusmcsgt,,, I think this is a new one, check it out.... It goes into much that wasn''t covered before.
A Pentagon official who is familiar with the episode offered a different interpretation: Army officials were concerned that the report would strain relations with a powerful defense secretary and become caught up in the political debate over the war. %u201CThe Army leaders who were involved did not want to take the chance of increasing the friction with Secretary Rumsfeld,%u201D said the official, who asked not to be identified because he did not want to alienate senior military officials.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/washington/11army.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&hp - Reply to this comment
- This blog has become a broken record..This blog has become a broken record.. This blog has become a broken record.. OOps sorry. I seem to be catching that bug...
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by j-whitman at 05:11 PM : Feb 11, 2008
I read that atricle some time back, J.
Just like those who said it would take hundreds of thousands of troops (Shinseki) and those who scoffed at the administration''s projected cost of the invasion/occupation (50 billion), and those who said that Iraq would never pay for itself, they simply refused to listen to knowlegeable people who told them the truth as opposed to what they wanted to hear. - Reply to this comment
- formrusmcsgt,,,, Check this article out -- A 2005 Pentagon report issued by the Rand Corporation lists how Bush, Rice & Rumsfeild ignored plans for post invasion Iraq for politics --- Bush caught in more lies which resulted in many more casualties, & the lack of progress
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/washington/11army.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&hp&oref=slogin - Reply to this comment
- Now that''''s just not true and you know it. CBS and all the other outlets ran EVERY lie told by Bush and his Administration... LIES that got us into this mess.
Posted by MCVet at 03:17 PM : Feb 11, 2008
The media was so busy carrying the administration''s dirty water they didn''t even pause to look in the bucket. - Reply to this comment
So
After all the killing
and torture
and rendition flights
and bombing
and hundreds locked up for years without charges
and Fear Color Codes
and $ Trillions spent
6 are charged at Gitmo?
I want my money back, Mr. Bu$h...
and BTW, most Americans believe YOU and Cheney did 9/11...- Reply to this comment
- Just another blackmailed pervert doing what Israel tells him to do. Take america back.
- Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




