Comments on: 2 U.S. Troops Killed in Baghdad
Iraqi Forces To Lead Anti-Insurgent Efforts In Mosul
- If Bush "lied" as you would want to believe, why wouldn''''t he be above planting WMDs in Iraq to vindicate himself ? Answer that for me.
Posted by speakinup at 06:00 PM : Jan 27, 2008
He tried that--he DID say there were weapons of amss destruction in Iraq even after the inspectors said they couldn''t find any--oh wait was that just a "false statement"? - Reply to this comment
- witless - I''m glad to hear you can admit you were wrong. It is a first that I can remember.
I NEVER misrepresented your service record - It is all in black and white below - just take a look. - Reply to this comment
- speakinup ---- Bush did plant WMD''s -- In your mind
- Reply to this comment
One of the most well known lies of the Bush regime, has to be the whole "yellow-cake" ruse.
Not only was this lie exposed as a crude hoax by the IAEA, in the weeks BEFORE the fraud-based illegal invasion of Iraq, but the Regime continued to prop up this shabby hoax months after the launch of the unjustifiable war of aggression against Iraq, even stooping so low as to commit the clearly treasonous act of outting an under-cover CIA agent, Valerie Plame, in an effort to prop-up this original lie.
This is an example of an irrefutable series of lies churned out by the illegitimate Bush cabal.- Reply to this comment
- liberalme - I''m not sure I''d call the, what was it 3rd largest Army in the world, "unarmed".
So would you care to talk about why Hillary and Bill''s ''false statments'' didn''t make it on the "news" article ? Or, is that just too much of a brain f@rt for your liberal mind to deal with ?
Or, how about this liberalme....
If Bush "lied" as you would want to believe, why wouldn''t he be above planting WMDs in Iraq to vindicate himself ? Answer that for me. - Reply to this comment
- speakinup,,,, I give up... What did you tell me about my military service ?? --- Oh, nevermind... You said 20 years of submarine service isn''t honorable or hazzardous.
- Reply to this comment
- speakinup,,,,, "Grow a brain" ???? ---- So that''s the problem -- The only thing you''ve been feeding your brain is fertilizer
- Reply to this comment
- witless - don''t bother asking me a question - you haven''t answer mine yet.
What lie did I tell about your service record ? - Reply to this comment
- Let''s put it this way
Bush would have a more favorable approval rating if he just made a few "false statements" about having S E X in the oval office, that telling over 900 "false statements" about invading an unarmed country! - Reply to this comment
- liberalme - let the wikipedia definition spell it out for you:
A lie is a type of deception in the form of an untruthful statement WITH THE INTENTION TO DECEIVE, often with the further intention to maintain a secret or reputation, or to avoid punishment. To lie is to state something ONE KNOWS IS FALSE with the intention that it be taken for the truth by someone else. A liar is a person who is lying or who lies repeatedly.
Caps are mine. THAT would be the difference between ''false statments'' and ''lies''.
Grow a brain will you.
Yeah - you are ignorant. You are welcome. - Reply to this comment
- speakinup,,,, You still here ???
- Reply to this comment
- Dang - all the far left got their lies exposed.
Then they left!
Well I''ll have to SEEK THEM OUT!!!!!!
No rest for socialistic a-holes!!!! - Reply to this comment
- Guess again liberalme. The words used were ''''false statements''''... Guess what ? False statments are not the same as "LIES".
Oh dumb me!!
Whats the opposite of FALSE? would that be TRUTH?? Sooooo if something is FALSE---that would mean it''s NOT THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!! - Reply to this comment
Re: "NOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo! ONLY Republicans were in the article.
"Where they called liars for making the same statment ?
"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooo!
"SHAME !!!!! SHAME !!!!!! SHAME!!!!!!!
"For suppressing the truth, FAR LEFT!!!!!!"
###
The poster "speakinup" appears to be extremely frustrated over their own poor performance, and about the 935+ exposed lies of their puppet-Fuhrer Bush.- Reply to this comment
- ********** - are you 10 years old ?
Do you know what a traitor is ?
I noticed you avoided telling me how many folks have been killed by losing their constitutional rights!!!
Way to go, looks like it''s the old bate a switch.
If I''m liberal, I get to change the topic any time I wish. Did you flip chess boards when it because apparent you were losing ?
So, after you answer the above question - why don''t you amaze us with your hindsite on what YOU would have done, **********.
I mean, you''ve got it all figured out, right ?
Yeah - WAY TO GO FEELFREE - call him betrayus. What a US Serviceman''s dream girl you are. Hey do us all a favor - head for hugo chavez, tell him you want to serve him. Go ahead, leave us will you.
Most likely you ALREADY live there. - Reply to this comment
- "speakinup,,,, So you''''ve proven your dishonor to this country & it''''s military ------ Why would you object to his enlisting, or anyones efforts to increase recruiting successes ??? Posted by j-whitman
Another two twisted lies spew out of your pathetic lying mouth.
1) show me where I said I "objected to his enlisting"
2) You are TAUNTING, you are NOT recruiting.
Liar, nothing but lies seem to come from you. You simply can''t help yourself can you ?
Guess again liberalme. The words used were ''false statements''... Guess what ? False statments are not the same as "LIES".
The fact of the matter is, Hillary and Bill BOTH made the same ''false statments'' as President Bush.
Did they get in the article ?
NOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooo! ONLY Republicans were in the article.
Where they called liars for making the same statment ?
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooo!
SHAME !!!!! SHAME !!!!!! SHAME!!!!!!!
For suppressing the truth, FAR LEFT!!!!!! - Reply to this comment
Re: "2 U.S. Troops Killed in Baghdad"
At least we can safely say that they died for nothing at all worth while.
At the current rate, the Bush regime will have martyred an even 4,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq, by the 5th anniversary of the lie-based and illegal invasion.- Reply to this comment
- Please don''''t insult my intelligence by saying it wasn''''t terrorists that flew into the twin towers. And that it wasn''''t a 757 that flew into the Pentagon.
Posted by speakinup
DUH--Bush/Cheney planned to invade Iraq before they were "appointed" to the throne! 911???? What a convenience!
Yep they were terrorists-but the buildings didn''t burn to the ground, structually they can''t do that---they should have toppled over---they were imploded and if you look hard enough--you can find that on the internet, unfortunately, not on FOX unfair and unbalanced news. - Reply to this comment
The good news is that General Betrayus says that he only needs another 6 months to figure out if he is losing in Iraq.- Reply to this comment
- "HOW serious do you think these little terrorists are? **********
about 3000 folks worth, in less than 2 hours.
Need any other facts, ********** ?
How about you tell me just how many folks have died from having their constitutional rights "infringed" upon, ok.
Then let''s compare.
Please don''t insult my intelligence by saying it wasn''t terrorists that flew into the twin towers. And that it wasn''t a 757 that flew into the Pentagon. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




