Comments on: Blasts In Northern Iraq Kill At Least 22
At Least 17 Dead And Scores Wounded In Mosul Explosion; Suicide Bomb Kills 5 Near Kirkuk
Add a Comment See all 123 Comments
- FeelFree1, no one has posted more messages on this article than you. YOur strained effort to deflect blame away from your savage brothers is obvious idiotic and tiresome. You sir are not convincing anyone!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by notblue at 09:36 AM : Jan 22, 2008
+ report abuse
Convinced me Swastika Breath and I have been there!! Maybe you Nazi''s should learn to actually READ before you start trying to beat up on others!! After all YOU did push the Worst leader in our history on us now didn''t you. Oh! Let me guess!! YOU still believe that Iraq was responsible for the Attack on 9/11?!? I knew some of you freaks actually DID still believe that lie, just never met one that could walk and talk at teh same time. Sieg Heil Bush!! - Reply to this comment
- Wrong Again, for DEMOCRATS. When American troops entered IRAQ during THE FIRST GULF WAR, they met IRAQ families and were supprised at how friendly they were until they found an AK-47 under the bed. Then they discovered that EVERY FAMILY IN IRAQ had an AK-47 under the bed. This is the culture has existed in IRAQ for decades George W. Bush came to Town. So my argument is the same. Democrats blame anyone except the terrorists for any problem in the world. IRAN, Al Qaeda and Democrats: all on the same side.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by demslie at 10:11 AM : Jan 22, 2008
+ report abuse
Hey there Sparky, how about you put away the swastika and tell us all why we''re in Iraq when the REAL Enemy is in the mountians of Pakistan? No one deny''s that and no one deny''s the fact that he, Bin Laden, has completely rebuilt USING the attack on Iraq. He now threatens our Ally, which ACTUALLY does have Nukes!! Could it be that you and the Party are wrong here? As a Veteran who HAS been in combat I can assure you that you are!! Sieg Heil Bush!! - Reply to this comment
- FeelFree1, sorry, the only person perpetuating lies on this forum is you. All of us are tired of your lies, tired of you defending Jihad, tired of you defending murder, tired of you defending suicide bombings, tired of you defending this murderous cult known as Islam, and tired of you defending enemies of America. Of course YOU yourself, regardless of your citizenship, are an enemy of America. So why should we expect anything better from you? Answer: we don''''t.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by michaelt302 at 11:31 AM : Jan 22, 2008
+ report abuse
Well help me out here swastika breath. You freaks are ready to attack anyone who doesn''t agree with the Fuhrer and the "Party" on this insane policy so how about you answer the question of a Combat Vet. What in the world did Iraq have to do with the Attack on this nation? Since the guy we were told by the Fuhrer planned and ordered the attack is in the Mountains of Pakistan, completely rebuilt USING this policy, I need an answer to that question!! Sieg Heil Bush!! - Reply to this comment
- Yep, my tax dollars well spent. Two trillion dollars down the tube, and not even a funeral is safe from suicide bombers now.
- Reply to this comment
The lie-based and criminal U.S. war of aggression rages on against the people of Iraq, and Regime apologists continue to find new excuses to use for blaming the people of Iraq for the misery and suffering that the stupidity, ignorance, hatred, and blind fear, of the Regime dead-enders have brought them.- Reply to this comment
- This notion that the US ''created terrorists'' in Iraq is misleading and even despicable. Are we all to believe that, in a span of 1 year from 2003 to 2004, that tens of thousands of simple farmers and basket-weavers and truckers just became, overnight, expert bomb-makers and torturers? Look folks, these guys were ALREADY murderers and terrorists. And even though the war in Iraq attracted a number of foreign Jihadists who just wanted to kill Americans, these Jihadists would simply be somewhere else killing innocents if they weren%u2019t in Iraq. The Iraq war simply affords the US and it''s allies an opportunity to kill more of the terrorists in one place, rather than having to travel to 20 countries to do it. Why travel all over the county shooting vultures, when you can just leave a dead cow in a field and blow them all up when they show up to feed?
www.jihadwatch.org - Reply to this comment
- Every time a suicide bomber slaughters women and children the Democrats blame it on anyone but the terrorists. All the major countries of the the United Nations agree that IRAN is giving weapons, training and money to Al Qaeda in IRAQ. The only groups happy about the genocide are IRAN, Al Qaeda and Democrats.
Posted by demslie at 08:08 AM : Jan 22, 2008
This is called a bait and switch. Yes, it is the terror in the country that is doing this now.
But don''''t forget it wasn''''t there before we attacked and that is the problem with your argument. This is a problem that we caused because we were lied to.
The UN had inspectors there in Iraq 3 days before when this administration called to tell them to get out because we were going to attack.
Wrong Again, for DEMOCRATS. When American troops entered IRAQ during THE FIRST GULF WAR, they met IRAQ families and were supprised at how friendly they were until they found an AK-47 under the bed. Then they discovered that EVERY FAMILY IN IRAQ had an AK-47 under the bed. This is the culture has existed in IRAQ for decades George W. Bush came to Town. So my argument is the same. Democrats blame anyone except the terrorists for any problem in the world. IRAN, Al Qaeda and Democrats: all on the same side. - Reply to this comment
- www.thereligionofpeace.com
Read, and learn. - Reply to this comment
- Let''s have a big round-of-applause for the "religion of peace".
- Reply to this comment
- Follow the money to Al Queda...there lies your answer. Bush''s Saudi brothers in action.
- Reply to this comment
- FeelFree1, no one has posted more messages on this article than you. YOur strained effort to deflect blame away from your savage brothers is obvious idiotic and tiresome. You sir are not convincing anyone!
- Reply to this comment
- Every time a suicide bomber slaughters women and children the Democrats blame it on anyone but the terrorists. All the major countries of the the United Nations agree that IRAN is giving weapons, training and money to Al Qaeda in IRAQ. The only groups happy about the genocide are IRAN, Al Qaeda and Democrats.
Posted by demslie at 08:08 AM : Jan 22, 2008
This is called a bait and switch. Yes, it is the terror in the country that is doing this now.
But don''t forget it wasn''t there before we attacked and that is the problem with your argument. This is a problem that we caused because we were lied to.
The UN had inspectors there in Iraq 3 days before when this administration called to tell them to get out because we were going to attack. - Reply to this comment
- Every time a suicide bomber slaughters women and children the Democrats blame it on anyone but the terrorists. All the major countries of the the United Nations agree that IRAN is giving weapons, training and money to Al Qaeda in IRAQ. The only groups happy about the genocide are IRAN, Al Qaeda and Democrats.
- Reply to this comment
Related:
"1st U.S. soldier in new MRAP vehicle dies in Iraq attack"
"Pentagon invested in trucks meant to provide more protection than Humvees"
BAGHDAD (AP) %u2014 A soldier killed over the weekend south of Baghdad was the first American casualty in a roadside bomb attack on a newly introduced, heavily armored vehicle, a military spokeswoman said Tuesday.- Reply to this comment
- HEROES IN THE FIGHT AGAINST FASCIST NAZI TERRORISLAM!!!
Young Muslims begin dangerous fight for the right to abandon faith
A group of young Muslim apostates launches a campaign today, the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks on America, to make it easier to renounce Islam.
The provocative move reflects a growing rift between traditionalists and a younger generation raised on a diet of Dutch tolerance.
The Committee for Ex-Muslims promises to campaign for freedom of religion but has already upset the Islamic and political Establishments for stirring tensions among the million-strong Muslim community in the Netherlands.
Ehsan Jami, the committee%u2019s founder, who rejected Islam after the attack on the twin towers in 2001, has become the most talked-about public figure in the Netherlands. He has been forced into hiding after a series of death threats and a recent attack.
The threats are taken seriously after the murder in 2002 of Pim Fortuyn, an antiimmigration politician, and in 2004 of Theo Van Gogh, an antiIslam film-maker.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2426314.ece - Reply to this comment
- weep for the non-muslims of iraq and all the non-muslim minorities in muslim majority countries living under their sick apartheid systems
Being non-Muslim in Islamic nations
means ''protection''--and problems.(World: Iraq)
The official term for this right is "dhimmitude." The world''s foremost expert on the subject, Bat Ye''Or, coined the word in 1983 to describe the legal and social condition of Jews and Christians (dhimmis) subjected to Islamic rule. Broadly interpreted, it appears benign: Non-Muslims enjoy a protected status among their Muslims neighbors: But dhimmitude becomes problematic because its supposed safeguards and protections can be withdrawn as selectively as they are applied by rulers or governments of Islamic states.
In Iraq, as in other predominately Muslim states, Christianity has existed side by side with Islam for centuries. For some observers (as well as those who experience it firsthand), the status of Christians is not one of cheery coexistence. Rather, it may be more like the old racial divides in the United States, where blacks lived near, but not integrated into, white society, and where they "kept their place"--separate and unequal.
In a July 24 interview with NCR, Baghdad Archbishop Jean Sleiman, leader of Iraq''s Latin Catholic church, said that in Iraq, "Christians and Muslims can I-live] side by side--but only side by side. Side by side, but not equally. No mixing, no integration."
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-121763784.html - Reply to this comment
To our troops:
"Do not fight for a dying regime. It is not worth your life."- GWB
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxKpeKQA6B4
Every U.S. service member, as you know, swears an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States...". Our Constitution cites international treaties as the "Supreme Law of the Land", meaning that ALL U.S. policies are bound by any international treaty of which the U.S. is signatory.
One such treaty is the U.N. Charter, which provides for only 2 cases which a member country may legally wage war against another. One is in the event of an immanent threat (currently being invaded/attacked), and the other requires a specific U.N. Security Council Resolution authorizing the use of force. We know that the Bush regime failed to push through an actionable U.N. Resolution, ahead of the invasion of Iraq, and we know that there was no immanent threat from the Saddam regime. As such, the war against Iraq violates the U.N. Charter, which is in turn a serious violation of our Constitution.- Reply to this comment
To our troops (cont.)-
The Iraq War also constitutes an "illegal war of aggression", as described by the "Nuremberg Charter", another U.S. obligated treaty, since it was an offensive action by the Bush regime, and there was no threat, only fabricated intelligence, in support of the invasion.
Additionally, our Constitution places the SOLE POWER of declaring war in the hands of our Congress. They have yet to even formally declare war, and they do not have the Constitutional authority to abdicate their responsibility to the President, or the Resident, as the case may be.- Reply to this comment
- Foreign Intel Had Identified WMD Sites
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/007528.php
Top Secret: Bush Told the Truth About WMD
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=26457045-1E9E-4795-9D31-0E5B73E74EE9 - Reply to this comment
- the Iraqi war is legal, demonic-rat hero oscar, emmy, nobel prize winning al bore says so,,,
it actually never ended since it only stopped by the signing of a ceasefire,,, just like the korean war,,,
the resumption of hostilities was only a matter of time since iraq broke the ceasefire agreement,,,
blame saddam for iraq,,, Even clintoon and the dems wanted the resumption of hostilities back in 1998,,,
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq''s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
Moreover, no international law can prevent the United States from taking actions to protect its vital interests, when it is manifestly clear that there is a choice to be made between law and survival. I believe, however, that such a choice is not presented in the case of Iraq. Indeed, should we decide to proceed, that action can be justified within the framework of international law rather than outside it. In fact, though a new UN resolution may be helpful in building international consensus, the existing resolutions from 1991 are sufficient from a legal standpoint. - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/gore/gore092302sp.html - Reply to this comment
