Comments on: U.S. Deaths In Iraq Continue To Decline

Officials Credit Troop Surge For Drop In U.S. Military And Iraqi Civilian Deaths

[i_say_so]

"U.S. Deaths In Iraq Continue To Decline".

Thats a GWB personal victory. The surge is working pretty good. There are no more truck bombers in crowded markets. No more death squads. Anbar province is a roses garden.Al qaeda in Iraq is defeated.
Thats why democrats are so desperate and hystericals.

[rerrorislam3]

Posted by CANYOUTELLME at 07:56 PM : Oct 23, 2007

the question is equal rights granted to adult citizens that are not muslim in muslim countries,,,

are under 18 yo non muslim citizens granted equal rights in muslim countries???

did not think so,,,

try to focus,,,

[rerrorislam3]

Posted by CANYOUTELLME at 07:52 PM : Oct 23, 2007

i am not talking about foreigners,,, i am talking about citizens that are not muslims,,, in a muslim country,,,

are you trying to justify the way terrorislam torments non muslims??? because of land ownership,,,

name one non muslim country that does not allow a citizen of that country to own land???

[canyoutellme-2009]

btw lars/terrorislam/rerrorislam.... the US is another country that does not grant equal rights to ALL citizens...

18 year olds are not granted the right to drink legally, but 21 year olds are. Explain that one to me. Also those under 18 don''t have anywhere NEAR the same rights as those 18 and over. In addition, look up property ownership rights in hawaii... you''ll be surprised at what you find. I guess the US is run by Terrorists then too eh? what a joke you are.

[canyoutellme-2009]

I can cite many NON muslim countries that ALSO do not grant equal rights to all citizens.
Posted by CANYOUTELLME at 07:40 PM : Oct 23, 2007

name them please,,,


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rerrorislam3 at 07:46 PM : Oct 23, 2007
+ report abuse
==========================================================

since you can come up with links all the time, do your OWN research... look up the following:

"foreigner" "own land" "country" and you will find that foreigners who become citizens in other lands are NOT granted the same rights to own land as the natives of the land are. That is ONE such difference that DOZENS if not HUNDREDS of countries subscribe to.

[rerrorislam3]

I can cite many NON muslim countries that ALSO do not grant equal rights to all citizens.
Posted by CANYOUTELLME at 07:40 PM : Oct 23, 2007

name them please,,,

[badmofojim]

Once agian, the sheer awsomeness of the US has WTFPWNED another country.

in the words of Team America:

"America, F**k YEAH!"

[canyoutellme-2009]

Posted by CANYOUTELLME at 07:14 PM : Oct 23, 2007

CANYOUTELLME

cuz i would really like to know if there are any out of all the terrorislamic countries,,, is there even one that grants equal rights to non muslims???

and please please please CANYOUTELLME why they do not???

and CANYOUTELLME if that is legal under international law???



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by rerrorislam3 at 07:30 PM : Oct 23, 2007
+ report abuse

========================================================
That is just ridiculous.. flat out ridiculous. Nothing in international law requires that countries must grant equal rights to all citizens regardless of their ethnicity. I can cite many NON muslim countries that ALSO do not grant equal rights to all citizens.

Just go away.. CBS has banned your multiple IDs so you keep coming up with more.. just disappear please.

[rerrorislam3]

Posted by CANYOUTELLME at 07:14 PM : Oct 23, 2007

CANYOUTELLME

cuz i would really like to know if there are any out of all the terrorislamic countries,,, is there even one that grants equal rights to non muslims???

and please please please CANYOUTELLME why they do not???

and CANYOUTELLME if that is legal under international law???

[rerrorislam3]

CANYOUTELLME

NONE OF US IS FREE UNLESS ALL ARE FREE!!!

WHY IS IT NOT ONE MUSLIM COUNTRY GRANTS EQUAL RIGHTS TO NON MUSLIMS???

Being non-Muslim in Islamic nations means ''protection''--and problems.(World: Iraq)
The official term for this right is "dhimmitude." The world''s foremost expert on the subject, Bat Ye''Or, coined the word in 1983 to describe the legal and social condition of Jews and Christians (dhimmis) subjected to Islamic rule. Broadly interpreted, it appears benign: Non-Muslims enjoy a protected status among their Muslims neighbors: But dhimmitude becomes problematic because its supposed safeguards and protections can be withdrawn as selectively as they are applied by rulers or governments of Islamic states.

In Iraq, as in other predominately Muslim states, Christianity has existed side by side with Islam for centuries. For some observers (as well as those who experience it firsthand), the status of Christians is not one of cheery coexistence. Rather, it may be more like the old racial divides in the United States, where blacks lived near, but not integrated into, white society, and where they "kept their place"--separate and unequal.

In a July 24 interview with NCR, Baghdad Archbishop Jean Sleiman, leader of Iraq''s Latin Catholic church, said that in Iraq, "Christians and Muslims can I-live] side by side--but only side by side. Side by side, but not equally. No mixing, no integration."
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-121763784.html

[canyoutellme-2009]

Personally, i''m greatful that the deaths are subsiding... but please note, it''s just the "rate of deaths" are subsiding.. there are STILL deaths and even 1 death is too many. So, are our other casulties declining also? I mean the maimed soldiers... and how about displaced iraqis? Is that rate also declining? If so, i''d like to see by how much.

Also, it sounds like the Iraqis are standing up so that the US can stand DOWN. Guess it''s time to bring the troops home... We honor our troops... we don''t want any more to die in this fight.... please send them home and do *NOT* fund this war with another 196 billion dollars please.

[rafterman1]

===rerrorislam3===

What''s the matter Laes, kicked off the board AGAIN?

[rerrorislam3]

Posted by CANYOUTELLME at 07:00 PM : Oct 23, 2007

the Iraqi war is legal, demonic-rat hero oscar, emmy, nobel prize winning al bore says so,,,
it actually never ended since it only stopped by the signing of a ceasefire,,, just like the korean war,,,

the resumption of hostilities was only a matter of time since iraq broke the ceasefire agreement,,,

blame saddam for iraq,,, Even clintoon and the dems wanted the resumption of hostilities back in 1998,,,

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq''s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Moreover, no international law can prevent the United States from taking actions to protect its vital interests, when it is manifestly clear that there is a choice to be made between law and survival. I believe, however, that such a choice is not presented in the case of Iraq. Indeed, should we decide to proceed, that action can be justified within the framework of international law rather than outside it. In fact, though a new UN resolution may be helpful in building international consensus, the existing resolutions from 1991 are sufficient from a legal standpoint. - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/gore/gore092302sp.html

[rerrorislam3]

THEY ARE LOSING

Last letter from doomed Al Qaida chief: "We are so desperate for your help"
http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2007/ss_iraq_09_30.asp

Iraq insurgency: People rise against al-Qa''eda
Damien McElroy spent a week in the heart of the insurgency in Anbar province in Iraq. In the second of seven exclusive reports he describes how peace and prosperity have returned to a town formerly riven by sectarian killings.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/08/wanbar308.xml

Al Qaeda Dealt Devastating Blow in Iraq
The U.S. military says it has dealt devastating and potentially irreversible blows to Al Qaeda in Iraq in recent months, leading some generals to advocate a declaration of victory over the group, which the Bush administration has long described as the most lethal U.S. adversary in Iraq, the Washington Post reported Monday.

Al-Qaeda In Iraq Reported Crippled
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/14/AR2007101401245_pf.html

REHAB IS NOT JUST FOR HOLLYWOOD TERRORISTS NOW

U.S. Tries Rehab For Religious Extremists
Singapore Has Reduced Its Detainee Ranks With Islamic Reeducation; A Model For U.S.?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/09/world/main3347089.shtml

[canyoutellme-2009]

tell me again who our enemy is? Right.. Al Qaida. Was Sadaam protecting Al Qaida? The answer is NO. So why did we invade their sovereign nation?

And YOU tell us again how Iraq didn''''t let them train on their soil as well as provide money to attack the US...GROW UP and stop believing in the fu(ked up conspirocy theroy you love to cater to...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by sbbm at 07:04 PM : Oct 23, 2007
+ report abuse
=
==============================================

wow, more LIES you spread.. Sadaam and Bin Laden were ENEMIES because Sadaam was SECULAR.. i.e., NON RELIGIOUS... do you not get that? He had zero control of the area of iraq that the camp was in. Furthermore, even your Emporer George Bush flat out admitted that Iraq had NOTHING to do with 09/11.

Al Qaida was NOT a nationalized force of Iraq and they were NOT funded by Iraq... no matter how you spin it... so how do you justify war with Iraq?

[rafterman1]

===And YOU tell us again how Iraq didn''''t let them train on their soil as well as provide money to attack the US...GROW UP and stop believing in the fu(ked up conspirocy theroy you love to cater to===

Nope, Saddam didn''t. Saddam wouldn''t allow anyone in his country who could vie with him for power. The lie you push is a common righty talking point. So effective that a third of Americans still believe 9-11 was launched by Iraq. But except for an offer to provide cash for families of suicide victims against Israel, Saddam was in a box.

[rafterman1]

===You extreme lefties are the immoral, extreme, lying criminals...if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck===

Yeah, how am I an immoral criminal? I didn''t realize being against unjust wars is immoral. And I am not extreme left, I am moderate who leans to the left. Oh, but I forgot. To you neoclowns, if you aren''t a goosestepping Busher, then you are extreme left.

[rafterman1]

===the problem with that is..these terrorists DO NOT ABIDE TO YOUR PHILOSOPHY...they will gladly kill your arse..anywhere..anytime..EVEN IF YOU DONT FIGHT...(they prefer the ones that dont fight)===

We fight where we are needed to fight. Iraq is not one of those places. But as usual, the neocon talking point of "liberals never fight" has to be pushed, doesn''t it?

[canyoutellme-2009]

good news for us means bad news for liberals and terrorists.


when this is said and done..history will know who cowered in fear and sided with the enemy...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by xzavierbrown at 06:37 PM : Oct 23, 2007
+ report abuse
=============================================================

tell me again who our enemy is? Right.. Al Qaida. Was Sadaam protecting Al Qaida? The answer is NO. So why did we invade their sovereign nation? Oh yeah, we uprooted their people, and forced at least 2 or so million people to flee the homes they''ve lived in for generations. Can''t you UNDERSTAND that? The insurgency isn''t Al Qaida... it''s the natives of Iraq who feel betrayed by our gov''t because we went in there and slaughtered innocents which just creates MORE resentment and MORE revenge killings by Iraqis! If another nation came in and invaded YOUR home and killed your father, mother, sister, brother... would YOU be hugging the troops who did that? or would you swear to get your revenge on them?? Let''s say they came over to free you from your terrorist leader, George Bush... Well, get ready, because i bet that''s going to happen and YOU will be called the "insurgent" and "enemy combattant"... amazing how the neoCONS just don''t GET IT.

[rafterman1]

===good news for us means bad news for liberals and terrorists. when this is said and done..history will know who cowered in fear and sided with the enemy===

This is bull s h i t and you righties know it. But you say it because you have nothing else to offer other than extremism. You say this lie just to antagonize because that''s who you are. When this is said and done, history will still recognize the immoral (and un-American) nature of the Iraq war, whether win, lose or draw.