Comments on: Iraq PM: Senate Proposal A "Catastrophe"

Prime Minister Sharply Rejects Government Decentralization Plan Pushed By Biden, Others

[iceman_1960]

"These sights are only full of the hired AlQueda hacks like McVet, Prinzowhales, jwhitman, iceman, snidegrass and the rest of the radicals in liberals clothing."
- Posted by notblue at 05:37 PM : Sep 28, 2007

My check must have got lost in the mail.

This is a silly accusation that flies back and forth; that various organizations have nothing better to do with their money than "pay" others to post at a FREE Comments section.

By the way, it''s "Sites" (short for "Websites"), not "Sights," moron.

[iceman_1960]

RE: Post by lars008 at 05:37 PM : Sep 28, 2007

Don''t post isolated quotes out of context.

Lets get down to brass tacks.

Did Democrats ever want a land invasion of Iraq ?

No, they wanted air and missile strikes, and you know it.

That''s the whole da*mned point -- the land invasion, THE QUAGMIRE.



lars008 is the Tokyo Rose of the Neocons.

[iceman_1960]

RE: "MOST Democrats in Congress voted AGAINST Bush''s "Authorization to Use Force" in October 2002.

Does anyone want to see the numbers behind this ACCURATE statement ?"

Here they are:

147 out of 257 Democrats in Congress voted against the Authorization to Use Force in Iraq, in October 2002.

For the math challenged, that''s a majority. (Admittedly a small one: 57%)

House of Representatives:
81 Democrats voted for the Quagmire
126 Democrats voted against the Quagmire

Senate:
29 Democrats voted for the Quagmire
21 Democrats voted against the Quagmire


Sources:

Senate Vote roll call (go to Vote by Position):

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00237

House of Representatives Vote roll call:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml

[lars008-2009]

Posted by Iceman_1960 at 05:25 PM : Sep 28, 2007

hahaha

wronggggggggggg lol

hahaha

"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq''s weapons of mass destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein''s regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0930-05.htm

[notblue]

The "Iraq quagmire" is caused by the insurgents, remember fanatical muslims bent on destroying any and all democracies in the middle east. These barbarians who''s ideology will not tollerate freedom and is dedicated to the creation of a 6th century theocracy with zero rights for nonmuslims, women, the list goes on and on. Of course CBS never mentioned the that another top Al Queda leader in IRAQ was killed today by U.S. troops. No good news in regards to Iraq or the war on terror will ever make the pages of leftwing central here at these CBS posts. These sights are only full of the hired AlQueda hacks like McVet, Prinzowhales, jwhitman, iceman, snidegrass and the rest of the radicals in liberals clothing. They don''t fool anyone we know who and what you are, the enemies of freedom and truth. Your blather is tired, old and becoming less relevant as your ant-American rants louder now that real progress is being made in Iraq and around the world. The fight against you and your evil brothers and cause will never stop until all of you are defeated or marginilized.

[lars008-2009]

Posted by Iceman_1960 at 05:25 PM : Sep 28, 2007

hahaha

wronggggggggggg lol

hahaha

US Vice-President Al Gore has told Iraqi opposition politicians that the United States remains committed to the overthrow of President Saddam Hussein. BBC 6/2000
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1854092/posts

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq''s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

Moreover, no international law can prevent the United States from taking actions to protect its vital interests, when it is manifestly clear that there is a choice to be made between law and survival. I believe, however, that such a choice is not presented in the case of Iraq. Indeed, should we decide to proceed, that action can be justified within the framework of international law rather than outside it. In fact, though a new UN resolution may be helpful in building international consensus, the existing resolutions from 1991 are sufficient from a legal standpoint. - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/gore/gore092302sp.html

[iceman_1960]

"MOST Democrats in Congress voted AGAINST Bush''s "Authorization to Use Force" in October 2002."

Does anyone want to see the numbers behind this ACCURATE statement ?

[lars008-2009]

Posted by Iceman_1960 at 05:19 PM : Sep 28, 2007

hahaha

wrongggggggggggggggggggg lol

hahaha

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1998/02/20/98022006_tpo.html

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/iraq/iraq172.htm

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1584/is_9_10/ai_59021377

Adversarial Myopia
http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=8570

[lars008-2009]

Posted by Iceman_1960 at 05:19 PM : Sep 28, 2007

hahaha

wrongggggggggggggggggggg lol

hahaha

"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
http://www.cnn.com/US/9802/04/us.un.iraq/

WASHINGTON (Feb. 18) -- In preparing the nation for a possible war with Iraq,
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/18/iraq.political.analysis/

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq''s weapons of mass destruction program." - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/17/transcripts/clinton.iraq/

[iceman_1960]

But lars008, the Tokyo Rose of the Neocons, just keeps lying about this, when he says the Democrats wanted this war just as much as the Republicans.

He just keeps lying and lying and lying about it.

He''s the Energizer Bunny of Prevarication.