Comments on: Senators' Plane Evades Ground Fire In Iraq

C-130 Carrying 4 Members Of U.S. Congress Was Under Fire From Rocket-Propelled Grenades

Add a Comment See all 94 Comments
by glossypan August 31, 2007 12:15 PM EDT
Not criminals!!! They have shredded our Constitution - warrantless wiretaps, no habeas corpus, torture, secret prisons, I don''t recall, I don''t recall, I don''t recall.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 August 31, 2007 12:09 PM EDT
We were shooting back at these people all through the Clinton administration.
Posted by jowand at 08:54 AM : Aug 31, 2007


Exactly. During the Clinton years, the peace agreement was being enforced. You have to ask yourself, "Why did Bush think that the existing peace agreement, that was in place for 12 years, wasn''t good enough?"
Reply to this comment
by jowand August 31, 2007 12:08 PM EDT
Thanks to the people who joined the services to protect our freedom. The horrible thing is they were hornswaggled by the gang of criminals who have control of our executive branch and they are living in squalor and risking their lives so Halliburton can pile up Mideast oil money and your tax dollars in Dubai.
Posted by glossypan at 08:57 AM : Aug 31, 2007

Nothing to do with Halliburton, and there is no gang of criminals other than the buch of loon Dems on AL Jizeera eveynight.
Reply to this comment
by glossypan August 31, 2007 11:57 AM EDT
Thanks to the people who joined the services to protect our freedom. The horrible thing is they were hornswaggled by the gang of criminals who have control of our executive branch and they are living in squalor and risking their lives so Halliburton can pile up Mideast oil money and your tax dollars in Dubai.
Reply to this comment
by jowand August 31, 2007 11:54 AM EDT
You are also wrong about Congress'''''''' not caring about attacks on ordinary soldiers. One of the reasons they gave for authorizing military force in Iraq was the assertion that Saddam''''''''s regime had
ordered "thousands" of attacks on the pilots enforcing the no-fly zones imposed at the end of Gulf War I.
Posted by secundus2 at 08:28 AM : Aug 31, 2007

We were shooting back at these people all through the Clinton administration.
Reply to this comment
by jowand August 31, 2007 11:50 AM EDT

How about showing some RESPECT for those of us who are VETERAN''''s OR have you to joined the Toe Tappin Association. For people to come on here and bash Veterans when you have NO idea what you are talking about, is disgusting. You Fascist just want to point finger''''s...it''''s the Dems'''' fault, its the liberals fault, it''''s the fault of the ACLU or whatever else you pathetic losers come up with. NO! We are bogged down in a quagmire because of the INCOMPETENCE of George Bush PERIOD!! Now go on to your Nazi Youth Class and leave the adults, you know those who have actually walked into combat, to discuss this mess. Sieg Heil and Amen.
Posted by MCVet at 08:24 AM : Aug 31, 2007

I see you are still doing the Nazi salute, don''t forget to put on your Iron Cross before you go out today, wouldn''t want anyone thinking you are normal. Also stop pushing your military service and your whining I''m a veteran cr*p on the site it''s pathetic you sound like your hero John F''n Kerry, the JFK wanna be.
Zig Hell you unhinged nut-job.

Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 August 31, 2007 11:44 AM EDT
You are also wrong about Congress'''' not caring about attacks on ordinary soldiers. One of the reasons they gave for authorizing military force in Iraq was the assertion that Saddam''''s regime had
ordered "thousands" of attacks on the pilots enforcing the no-fly zones imposed at the end of Gulf War I.
Posted by secundus2 at 08:28 AM : Aug 31, 2007


It''s kind of hard to launch an attack on an F-16 at 20,000 feet with an AK-47 or an RPG - wouldn''t you agree?
That was just another Bush lie that he used to try to convince Congress and the UN that Saddam Hussein was a grave and serious threat. It''s too bad that with 20/20 hindsight we can look back and see that he was really a stabilizing force in the mid-east. He held Iran in check, al Qaeda wasn''t allowed in Iraq, and there was no sectarian violence in Iraq.
It''s really too bad that Saddam Hussein was removed from power. The mid east was already unstable, but now thanks to Bush, it''s a powder keg ready to blow at any moment.
Reply to this comment
by redfiveuk August 31, 2007 11:43 AM EDT
The Iraqis probably wanted to get them on the ground so they could shower them with gratitude for what the US has done to their country. Right, Mr. Cheney?
Posted by glossypan at 08:34 AM : Aug 31, 2007

Thats the funniest thing I have read all day - Nice one. LoL
Reply to this comment
by usayesterday August 31, 2007 11:42 AM EDT

STAY THE COURSE

Posted by crater7 at 06:22 AM : Aug 31, 2007
.............

I hope you''re writing that post from Iraq. Because, if not, then you should be labeled as the biggest hypocrate and the biggest a$$-hole in the world.

However, if you would allow me to shoot at you with an AK-47 fully loaded, and you survive...

...then I would consider forgiving you.
Reply to this comment
by glossypan August 31, 2007 11:34 AM EDT
The Iraqis probably wanted to get them on the ground so they could shower them with gratitude for what the US has done to their country. Right, Mr. Cheney?
Reply to this comment
See all 94 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: