Comments on: 5 U.S. Soldiers Killed In Iraq Attack

Attack Climaxes Deadliest 3-Month Period For Americans Since The Iraq War Began

Add a Comment See all 103 Comments
by getit1776 June 29, 2007 2:14 PM EDT
OK, now we know where he's cutting and pasting this junk from. All of pwrslm's posts are copied and pasted off the House Republican Policy Committee website, word for word. The fool has no ideas of his own so he has to suck his opinions off someone else. Pathetic.
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales June 29, 2007 2:10 PM EDT
Which super power helped Saddam launch and fight his war of aggression against Iran? It was the Washington Regime. As the stone killer, Clinton SEcretary of State "Mad Dog" Albright opined, 'the strength of American foreign policy is that it doesn't alter with the party in power.'

The 'Saddam Problem' is not a party problem, it is a systemic problem and illustrates what is wrong with a foreign policy that puts oil and Israel above what is good for America.

It was Albright who refused the offer of Sudan to turn over OBL...It was Bush who ordered the FBI off the trail of OBL's family in America with threats of arest. The Stupid People's War was a bipartisan affair. The Senate Intelligence Committee passed on the obviously bogus case against Iraq....no one is bragging about that now.



Reply to this comment
by getit1776 June 29, 2007 2:09 PM EDT
pwrslm...If you are going to cut and paste things would you please give sources? Several of your posts are clearly quite old and without a sense of where you are getting this stuff your points are useless.
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 2:09 PM EDT
Funny how you ignore the big picture, which I have proven beyond any doubt, to nitpick a small hair that is not even consequential.
Posted by pwrslm at 10:58 AM : Jun 29, 2007

Strange wordings. In fact all your posts are oddly worded.

Can I ask where you're from? The manner in which you speak and they words you choose leads me to believe you are either:

1. A naturalized US citizen
2. Not an US Citizen.

You don't use any contractions that I can see, and your use of slang is forced and awkward which leads me to believe you are not a native english speaker.

It's ok, I don't care where you're from really. But as a born-in-the USA flesh and blood American, I don't appreciate being lectured by someone from another country about what my nation is and what it stands for.
Reply to this comment
by retiredinmex June 29, 2007 2:03 PM EDT
What the hell is Bush doing still in office?

He has illegally, immorally and unilaterally invaded a country that originally had no ties to terrorism. Now, yes, there are many terrorism threats as Iraq is an international terrorist congregation point.

I served in Iraq and spoke with hundreds of US and "Coalition" military members. I guarantee you there was no one who agreed with our/their presence in Iraq.

When was the last time you heard the media refer to "the Coalition?"

Who are the terrorists in Iraq? What the hell has Bush gotten us into? Where's the plan to get out of this quagmire?

Is there a poll of parents of the dead, injured or missing as to their support for this war?
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 2:01 PM EDT
Funny how you ignore the big picture, which I have proven beyond any doubt, to nitpick a small hair that is not even consequential.

Posted by pwrslm at 10:47 AM : Jun 29, 2007

Ok, that's probably about as close as I'll get to you admitting you were wrong. Fair enough.

The reality is that the "Big Picture" is not whatever Clinton may have said years ago and when he said it.

What matters is who got us there, how they got us there, and - as it's been pointed out - how to get us out of there. If you want to talk about "Big Pictures" let's talk about that. Attempts to draw Clinton into the debate are pointless and irresponsible.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 1:58 PM EDT
Saddam Hussein was not the only world leader to take the measure of President Clinton. Our friends and allies in the region and around the world no longer believe the United States will take a strong line against Saddam; as a result they are rushing to reach separate arrangements with Baghdad. Jordan, which dramatically threw its weight against Saddam last year, is now publicly critical of U.S. efforts to isolate him. Turkey encouraged Saddam to reassert himself in the north. Most of our European allies pointedly declined to support Clinton's recent military moves, as did Saudi Arabia. And, most strikingly, the Administration had to endure public rebuffs from Kuwait before that nation agreed to accept U.S. troops. Nations that were willing to support strong measures in 1990 are not willing to join a just-for-looks military policy that is merely annoying enough to anger Saddam without seriously weakening him.

It is a permanent badge of shame that the Clinton Administration has left the United States with.
Reply to this comment
by bobebenson June 29, 2007 1:56 PM EDT
LOOK AND SEE!
I.E.D.!
FIVE MORE SOLDIERS
KILLED BY ME!

YAAAAAAY SUNNIS!
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 1:53 PM EDT
not even close, chicken hawk, just like all your other lies and exagerations.
Posted by usadvisor101

i realize that this is the best you have to offer

your best day, and your best shot, makes roger_inkart look like a pro


and he is a mental midget
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 1:51 PM EDT
Anatomy of a Fiasco

In early 1996, President Clinton signed a secret directive authorizing a covert CIA operation to unseat Saddam Hussein. .... In America's largest covert operation since the successful CIA campaign against the Soviets in Afghanistan, Deutch personally promised the effort would succeed "within a year."
........
First, the CIA attempt to infiltrate the Republican Guard was uncovered. Reminiscent of the "exploding cigar" fiascoes targeting Fidel Castro in the early 1960s, one of the missions that Clinton approved was to plant a small bomb in one of Saddam Hussein's palaces. It went off, but not while Saddam Hussein was there. The fact that the bomb at least detonated was the only success of the infiltration. Through late June and early July 1996, Iraqi security forces systematically exposed every one of the U.S.-backed officers and agents in the ranks of the Republican Guard.
.........

"It was basically wiped out...a lot of [Iraqi] U.S. agents were killed," the Los Angeles Times quoted an unnamed intelligence source as concluding.

Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 1:47 PM EDT
Believing you know the truth and knowing the truth are not the same thing. I hope you learned something here today.
Posted by roger_inkart

Funny how you ignore the big picture, which I have proven beyond any doubt, to nitpick a small hair that is not even consequential.

Thats what mental midgets normally do. You call me stupid, idiotic, and a host of other insults, but you still cant find Google, let alone, demonstrate the capacity to research this on your own.

Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 1:46 PM EDT
Spout off on a solution to END this shiit. If ya's want to debate who's better on finding "facts" on the 'puter do it someplace else. Sheesh.
Posted by drummer94 at 10:43 AM : Jun 29, 2007

Criticism accepted.
Reply to this comment
by drummer94 June 29, 2007 1:43 PM EDT
You people are some pieces of work. Each of you spouting off about your intelligence or lack thereof. This is the HERE and NOW fer chrissakes. This article reports 5 more of our troops DEAD. Spout off on THAT. Spout off on a solution to END this shiit. If ya's want to debate who's better on finding "facts" on the 'puter do it someplace else. Sheesh.
Reply to this comment
by bobebenson June 29, 2007 1:40 PM EDT
Hey American taxpayers, THANKS for all the new guns! Could you please keep up this "Surge" thing? We need 'em for target practice!
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 1:32 PM EDT
You cant dispute my posts, so your yellow streak leads you to insult me. Thats the way of the coward.
Posted by pwrslm at 10:10 AM : Jun 29, 2007

Ok, yet only a few posts later we have this:

"...its that you are nothing more than a pond scum suckinng two faced wanna be that doesnt have the intelligence to get there."

and

"you are related to the trash."

Ah, good times. So, in other words you don't have a quote from Clinton in 1996 regarding regime change in Iraq, nor do you have any proof that what you said was true, despite your feverish defense of it. You are wrong at best, a liar at worst.

It was nice seeing you tie youself all up in knots thought. Perhaps in the future you'll check your facts before admonishing others.

Believing you know the truth and knowing the truth are not the same thing. I hope you learned something here today.
Reply to this comment
by bobebenson June 29, 2007 1:28 PM EDT
Clinton said it?
Bush said it?
WHO CARES! THE REGIME IS CHANGED! He's DEAD!!

"Boy this is FUN! It's like shooting fish in a barrell!!". (WE are the fish.)

Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 1:22 PM EDT
Right. You go take a look in the mirror before you start slinging this kind of mud. I've proven you a liar with you own posts.
Posted by roger_inkart at

you are so funny

you act like you actually know something, but you are willfuly ignorant

thats the only notable trait you have shown here

if there were actually a correlation between your words calling me a liar, and my posts linking legislation proving what I stated, its that you are nothing more than a pond scum suckinng two faced wanna be that doesnt have the intelligence to get there

in other words, congress passed the law, the senate passed the law, and the president passed the law, for Iraq regime change, resulting from the 1996 expulsion of the UN inspectors by Saddam, and you just can stand to be wrong so you call me the liar????

i cant even pity you

you are related to the trash
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 1:19 PM EDT
Like I said, you are a mental midget. Google must be too complex for you to navigate, or you would find that every I posted is factually true.
Posted by pwrslm at 10:14 AM : Jun 29, 2007

Right. I'm still waiting for that quote from 1996.
Reply to this comment
by king77shaw June 29, 2007 1:16 PM EDT
let us not forget the following Zionists who put Israel%u2019s interests far above the United States when crafting, promoting and implementing the Iraq War.

Richard Perle - chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. Chief architect of the Iraq war.

Paul Wolfowitz - Deputy Defense Secretary, dethroned World Bank head and member of Perle's Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon. Chief architect of the Iraq war.

Douglas Feith - Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. Feith is a pro-Israel extremist and is closely associated with the extremist group, the Zionist Organization of America. Chief architect of the Iraq war.

Kenneth Adelman - sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle, and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor. Chief architect of the Iraq war.

I. Lewis Scooter Libby - Vice President Dikk Cheney's Chief of Staff. The chief pro-Israel Jewish advisor to Cheney.

Elliott Abrams - National Security Council Advisor. He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration.

Robert Zoellick - our new World Bank leader and one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Zionists in the Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq.

David Frum - White House speechwriter behind the "Axis of Evil" label. He lumps together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war.
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 1:16 PM EDT
All that matters is that you have absolutely no business spreading the lies and politicizing the issues using lies like your beloved liberals are doing.
Posted by pwrslm at 10:10 AM : Jun 29, 2007

Right. You go take a look in the mirror before you start slinging this kind of mud. I've proven you a liar with you own posts.
Reply to this comment
See all 103 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (299 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: