Comments on: 5 U.S. Soldiers Killed In Iraq Attack

Attack Climaxes Deadliest 3-Month Period For Americans Since The Iraq War Began

Add a Comment See all 103 Comments
by j-whitman June 29, 2007 3:34 PM EDT
pwrslm,,,, Some logic you use ----- We can't see them,,, We can't find them,,, We don't know where they went to ,,, so ergo, they exist ?????
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 3:28 PM EDT

pwrslm,,, You are not credible on anything --- Scot Ritter was correct, he was the Chief United Nations Weapons Inspector from 91-98.
Posted by j-whitman

no scott was wrong

there is still, as was then, no credible evidence that the stuff was destroyes, beyond the claims of the bathist party led by saddam

we still have no idea where it went

far as we know, its buried in the iraq desert waiting for someone to dig it up

just like these jets were buried, that even scott the con artist ritter didnt know about

http://xpda.com/junkmail/junk155/buriedJets.htm
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 3:25 PM EDT
...but pwrclown, that claims to be so much more knowledgeable than us, is too stupid to know how to clean up his repaste !!!
Posted by usadvisor101 at 12:14 PM : Jun 29, 2007

And the apostrophe appears to be missing from his keyboard.

You see pwrslm (fraud) this is how Americans write. They write like they think. You don't write like a native American, and it is because you are not one.

Now, why don't you head to some other forum where you haven't been exposed as a fraud?
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 29, 2007 3:21 PM EDT
pwrslm,,, You are not credible on anything --- Scot Ritter was correct, he was the Chief United Nations Weapons Inspector from 91-98.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 June 29, 2007 3:19 PM EDT
"what a pathetic chicken hawk you are. only an idiot would compare a paltry little "werewolf" resistance that killed no americans that I know of, to the resistance in iraq that has cost $450,000,000,000 and 3600 american lives not to mention teh 65,000 dead iraqis."
- Posted by usadvisor101 at 11:39 AM : Jun 29, 2007

He must have been confused bt some Lon Chaney movie at 2 in the morning. Or maybe he rented that porno flick "Werewolf Women of the SS".

The historical Werwolf or Wolverine Resistance in Germany did pull off a couple of assassinations, but comparing that to Iraq is like comparing the Campfire Girls to the Green Berets.

Source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werwolf
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 3:17 PM EDT
scott ritter is as quotable as a mafia hit man, and paid by saddams oil for cash exchange

Editor's note, 1/30/04: On January 25, 2004, a daily newspaper in Iraq called al Mada published a list of individuals and organizations who it says received oil from the now-deposed regime. Among those listed is Shakir al Khafaji, an Iraqi-American from Detroit, who ran "Expatriate Conferences" for the regime in Baghdad. Al Khafaji also contributed $400,000 to the production of Scott Ritter's film "In Shifting Sands." Cashhttp://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/002/605fgcob.asp
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 29, 2007 3:17 PM EDT
pwrslm,,, You don't know me at all.. My work record is a hell of alot more sucessful than Bush's life time public record of failures & fraud. ---

But, the subject is more US Soldiers killed in Iraq & you would rather complain about Clinton, Gore & anyone but Bush
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 3:15 PM EDT
(funny enuf, yew all shore gotta case of dumazz, and yer warin it on yor headz lyk idiutz)
Posted by pwrslm at 12:06 PM : Jun 29, 2007

You see, now you're trying too hard. Or did you suddenly completely change your manner of writing in one post? Or rather, did someone else post this?

Fraud.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 3:13 PM EDT
pwrslm,,,, Over 3,558 American troops are KIA -- For what gain ???? -- Your BS version of facts is killing more of our troops today..
TRUTH --- BUSH IS A TOTAL FAILURE
Posted by j-whitman at

oh, so iraqi freedom is of no value to you?

oh well, we see exactly what color your soul is...calling the truth bs also shows us what you are all about...the only failure you should concentrate on is yourself
Reply to this comment
by prinzowhales June 29, 2007 3:13 PM EDT
Marine Major Scott Ritter of the UN Inspection team noted that his team was given numerous leads by the US for the location of WMDs--ALL of them were wrong. The US leads according to one member were "worse than useless."

'Foreign Intelligence Agencies say' is not evidence--it is hearsay--and, if it can't be substantiated it is worse than hearsay--it is evidence that someone is trying to 'seed' your intelligence-gathering apparatus. No one would make a decision based on such a flimsy, nonsensical rationale outside the Neo-con family of fools and traitors.

Much of the nonsense came from Israeli intelligence--which was linked to the DoD through Douglas Feith, the Israeli attorney who served under Rumsfeld, resigning and slithering away as the AIPAC Israeli spy case began to unfold...Larry Franklin, who provided classified documents to AIPAC, the Israeli intel front, was part and parcel of the Office of Special Plans that cooked intelligence to make the case for war with the Israelis, their animal Chalabi and the likes of Judith Miller of the NEW YORK TIMES.

Intelligence was cooked to provide a rationale for Bush's decision for war. He supported war prior to his election. He has done nothing to discipline the criminals who cooked the intelligence which shows that he did not care about the accuracy of the intelligence-- he merely wanted a peg on which to hang his pro-war hat.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 3:11 PM EDT
For Gore and the president%u2019s Democratic critics, all these facts count for nothing. .....According to Gore and the Democrats America went to war for reasons that are either illegitimate or immoral or both.....the sending of American troops to Iraq was an imperial aggression, orchestrated by the president and his advisors who manipulated the evidence, deceived the people, and ignored the UN to carry out their malign intent: %u201CThe pursuit of %u2018dominance%u2019 in foreign policy led the Bush administration to ignore the United Nations,%u201D writes Gore, showing his utter contempt for the facts. What Bush actually ignored was the French, who built Saddam%u2019s nuclear reactor, collaborated with Saddam%u2019s theft of the %u201COil for Food%u201D billions, and threatened to veto any attempt to enforce international law or the UN ultimatum. Bush also ignored the Russians, who supplied two-thirds of Saddam%u2019s weapons, helped him sabotage the UN sanctions, and refused to enforce the UN ultimatum. What Bush did not ignore were the 17 UN resolutions designed to keep the Middle East peace and protect the world from the consequences of its failure. Al Gore did that.


By David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 29, 2007 3:11 PM EDT
pwrslm,,,, Over 3,558 American troops are KIA -- For what gain ???? -- Your BS version of facts is killing more of our troops today..
TRUTH --- BUSH IS A TOTAL FAILURE
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 3:11 PM EDT
Just trying to bury posts.

Typical right-wing tactic. When faced with the truth, make a lot of noise, try to distract, and hope no one notices.

But "pwrslm" is a fraud. And more and more people like him are being drown out by reason and common sense. His side needs the conflict. His side needs division. His side needs to have at at each other's throat. Divide and conquer. You're with us or against us.

It's a clever tactic, but one that ultimately defeats itself. The reason being is that people, eventually, realize they're being fooled. They're being manipulated. And there is blow-back to deal with.

The Bush administration and the GOP are feeling this now. They benefitted from a divided America. But we are tied. My next door neighbor isn't my worst enemy. But the right-wing pundits and the GOP would have you believe he is.

Enough. We need answers. We need solutions. More division and squabbling isn't going to help.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 3:06 PM EDT
ya wanna know how to **** off a liberal?

tell the truth!!

(funny enuf, yew all shore gotta case of dumazz, and yer warin it on yor headz lyk idiutz)


He is not a native American. In fact, I doubt he's even IN the US.
Posted by roger_inkart

(any you are a liar)
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 3:03 PM EDT
A third Democratic lie, regurgitated by Gore, is the famous accusation about the sixteen words Bush used in the State of the Union address on the eve of the war. According to Gore, Bush claimed %u201Cthat he had documentary proof%u201D that Saddam Hussein attempted to buy fissionable uranium from the African state of Niger. According to Gore the %u201Cdocumentary proof%u201D was revealed to be an Italian forgery for which Bush failed to apologize. According to Gore, there was no inquiry into how this happened. According to Gore, the Niger claim was one of the key falsehoods on which Bush based the %u201Crationale%u201D for the war. Every one of these assertions is a distortion of the facts and false.



First, the Niger claim was not part of the rationale for the war. It is not mentioned in the Authorization for the Use of Force legislation or in UN Security Council ultimatum 1441, which constitute the actual reasons the United States and Britain went to war in Iraq. In his State of the Union address the president did not say he had %u201Cdocumentary proof%u201D of an Iraqi mission to obtain uranium in Niger. He said %u201CThe British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.%u201D Those sixteen words were all he said. Every one of these words, moreover, was true then and remains true today.
Reply to this comment
by getit1776 June 29, 2007 2:58 PM EDT
Gore%u2019s charges continue: %u201CWe were told by the President that war was his last choice, when it was his first preference.%u201D Was it? That depends on what one means by %u201Cfirst preference - pwrlsm

More David Horowitz. For crying out loud if you are going to crib other people's stuff would you please give them some credit!
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 2:58 PM EDT
My god man can you think for yourself and have an original thought?
Posted by getit1776 at 11:52 AM : Jun 29, 2007

No he can't. But then again, why should he? Perhaps the RNC is paying him $1.00 a day to post to these forumns from his squalid mud hut somwhere in Asia?

He is not a native American. In fact, I doubt he's even IN the US.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 29, 2007 2:57 PM EDT
pwrslm,,,,, Your grasping girl... Now you revert to Clinton & Viet Nam ------ No comparisons, exept the Viet Nam people didn't support the American war just as Iraq's people donn't support this American war.
IRAQ HURTS THE WAR ON TERROR & EMBOLDENS THE ENEMY
Reply to this comment
by roger_inkart June 29, 2007 2:54 PM EDT
"...agency %u2013 including the British..."

Posted by pwrslm at 11:43 AM : Jun 29, 2007

Please note the "%u2013" in this post. This is caused by an unrecognized character in a post, often a non-standard quotation. In other words, he is just cutting and pasting from another website.

So, we've got fraud, liar and now we can add plagiarist to the list. Man, you are really a piece of work!

But, really, I can't think of anyone better to be defending the war in Iraq and the Bush administration! You're a perfect match: dishonest, deceptive and both total and utter frauds.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 29, 2007 2:52 PM EDT
Gore%u2019s charges continue: %u201CWe were told by the President that war was his last choice, when it was his first preference.%u201D Was it? That depends on what one means by %u201Cfirst preference.%u201D If what Gore means is that the president prepared for war with Saddam long before the war began, well, of course he did.

It was his responsibility to do so.

It is the Pentagon%u2019s motto %u2013 and a fundamental doctrine of every strategist from Sun Tzu to Clausewitz %u2013 that if you want peace, prepare for war. By 2001, when Bush took up residence in the Oval Office, Saddam had already broken the Gulf War truce many times over. American pilots were engaged in a low-intensity armed conflict with the Iraqi military over the %u201Cno-fly zones%u201D the truce had created. Clinton and Gore had allowed Saddam to get away with breaking the truce he had signed for two reasons. First because they were preoccupied with the fallout from Clinton%u2019s affair in the White House; but more importantly, because ever since Vietnam the Democrats had shown no interest in deploying American troops to protect the national interest (and thus had opposed the first Gulf War).

Reply to this comment
See all 103 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

    (337 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: