Comments on: 3 GIs Killed In Baghdad Bridge Blast

Six Soldiers Wounded As Bomb Hits Bridge Checkpoint; Former Sunni Foes Asked For Help

Add a Comment See all 173 Comments
by pwrslm June 12, 2007 1:20 AM EDT
pwrslm,,, Your "decider" today said, "It's my government" ----- That means it no longer belongs to Americans... He's showe us time after time he will always ignore American voters.
Posted by j-whitman

Look, when I said your not worth anything, that means I really dont care what your posting.

I already know your a liar, so all the double talk and BS you spew only amounts to one thing.

The only good your doing here is to puff up your pathetic ego, which is also useless..your such a loser.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 12, 2007 1:16 AM EDT
pwrslm wrote:

"Obvously, your privy to somethin the news agencies arent there boy, or your so full o yerself that ya arent worth speaking too....so why cant ya link us to a verifiable bush source that can show us that ya got something instead of spread puke all over a post and tell us its caviar....

so what ya got boy? any real source?"

Eh? Can't you read?

Do you mean that you can't find a copy of GW Bush's plan?

Oh, and stop calling me boy, you southern redneck piece of cr@p.
Posted by mcdazzled

Read it just fine. It dont say what you posted boy. So that makes you a lyin pond scum suckin POS. And by the way, the shoe fits, thats why I call ya boy. You dont have what it takes to be a man and uphold the truth.

(redneck? No Im just a man, unlike you, who hate liars.)
Reply to this comment
by June 12, 2007 12:38 AM EDT
brianp55 wrote:

"I said it before and I'll say it again, you can't blame the Iraqis. They did not ask to be invaded and whether it's attributable to laziness, incompetence, corruption or cowardice, it is unreasonable to criticize them for not meeting American standards and expectations....simply, I might add, so that we can get the hell out of there."

I don't blame the Iraqis.

However, they need to rise to the occasion - if not for us, then for themselves.

You might be satisfied with them remaining a largely corrupt and ineffective Government and Army, but I certainly don't.

We should be providing them help, training and equipment so that they can look after themselves.

If we don't, there will always be a need for us to be there, and we will continue losing good people in what is largely a civil war.

We do have a responsibility to Iraq, but they have an even greater responsibility to themselves.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 June 12, 2007 12:18 AM EDT
I said it before and I'll say it again, you can't blame the Iraqis. They did not ask to be invaded and whether it's attributable to laziness, incompetence, corruption or cowardice, it is unreasonable to criticize them for not meeting American standards and expectations....simply, I might add, so that we can get the hell out of there.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 11, 2007 10:56 PM EDT
pwrslm,,, Your "decider" today said, "It's my government" ----- That means it no longer belongs to Americans... He's showe us time after time he will always ignore American voters.
Reply to this comment
by June 11, 2007 10:53 PM EDT
pwrslm wrote:

"Obvously, your privy to somethin the news agencies arent there boy, or your so full o yerself that ya arent worth speaking too....so why cant ya link us to a verifiable bush source that can show us that ya got something instead of spread puke all over a post and tell us its caviar....

so what ya got boy? any real source?"

Eh? Can't you read?

Do you mean that you can't find a copy of GW Bush's plan?

Oh, and stop calling me boy, you southern redneck piece of cr@p.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 11, 2007 10:53 PM EDT
pwrslm,,, Your "decider" says Americans won't do the work,,,, Obviously Iraqi's wont do the work -- Build a tunnel from our southern border to Iraq, the Mexicans will do it.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 11, 2007 10:49 PM EDT
pwrslm,,,

Our boys died today becaus they don't have enough troops or adaquate equipment to do the dam job & Iraqi's won't ---- Bush's new plan is spread our troops out even thinner & arm the friggin enemy --------- You call that a plan ???????? A friggin moron can do better
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 11, 2007 10:48 PM EDT

From what I can see, GW Bush's plans are as follows:

1. Allow the Iraqi Gov to sit back and do nothing.
2. Allow the Iraqi Army to sit back and do nothing.
3. Allow US Troops to do everything.
4. Increase the number of US Troops on the ground in Iraq.
5. Ensure US Troops do the Iraqis work for them.
6. Same old, same old.
Posted by mcdazz

Obvously, your privy to somethin the news agencies arent there boy, or your so full o yerself that ya arent worth speaking too....so why cant ya link us to a verifiable bush source that can show us that ya got something instead of spread puke all over a post and tell us its caviar....


so what ya got boy? any real source?
Reply to this comment
by June 11, 2007 10:47 PM EDT
I forgot to add Number 7 on GW Bush's plan for Iraq.

7. Let the Democrats clean up the mess I've created.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 11, 2007 10:45 PM EDT
pwrslm,,, That's one major differance between you Bushies & the rest of America ---- You think going on 5 years of failed policies, a failed war, increased terrorism, lying to America, War Profiteering & the deaths of over 3,500 American troops for no gain at all - funny
Posted by j-whitman

oh go tell your mother, may be she will believe you

as far as Im concerned, your bias and bigotry against anything that bush does negates the value of your imput....your conspiracy theory BS doesnt fly

lies dont change the truth..you condemn anything an everything and provide "NOT ONE" solution...your useless, you cleave to gossip and rumors and then repeat the same lies

but the truth never changed

our boys are over there dying so you can **** and moan back here, making you no better than pond scum.
Reply to this comment
by June 11, 2007 10:43 PM EDT
pwrslm wrote:

"funny thing

not one good suggestion providing a reasonable alternative to Bush's plans

but there are plenty of you that can raise a stink for nothing!!!"

So tell us - are you happy with GW Bush's plans?

Do you think his plans are working?

I look forward to your answers.

Also, clearly, you are selective in what you read.

Most responses to questions similar to yours involve the following (very brief):

1. Ensuring the Iraqi Gov takes over the responsibility for day to day security of Iraq.
2. Ensuring the Iraqi Army has adequate equipment/training and infrastructure.
3. Putting into place a system of "checks and balances" to ensure that the Iraqi Gov/Army is handling day to day security.
4. Beginning a staged withdrawal of US troops.

And the Dems have announced their plans.

From what I can see, GW Bush's plans are as follows:

1. Allow the Iraqi Gov to sit back and do nothing.
2. Allow the Iraqi Army to sit back and do nothing.
3. Allow US Troops to do everything.
4. Increase the number of US Troops on the ground in Iraq.
5. Ensure US Troops do the Iraqis work for them.
6. Same old, same old.
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 11, 2007 10:42 PM EDT
wasnt the study applauded by demoncraps suggestine working with the sunnis and giving up iraq to iranian dissidents and islamic barbary?

so now that we are stepping toward that goal, why is everyone pissing and moaning about it?
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 11, 2007 10:41 PM EDT
pwrslm,,, That's one major differance between you Bushies & the rest of America ---- You think going on 5 years of failed policies, a failed war, increased terrorism, lying to America, War Profiteering & the deaths of over 3,500 American troops for no gain at all - funny
Reply to this comment
by pwrslm June 11, 2007 10:29 PM EDT
funny thing

not one good suggestion providing a reasonable alternative to Bush's plans

but there are plenty of you that can raise a stink for nothing!!!
Reply to this comment
by June 11, 2007 10:06 PM EDT
j-whitman wrote:

"mcdazz, Think this is bad? Just wait a few more months.... Bush should have been in prison years ago..."

Indeed. :-(
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 11, 2007 9:32 PM EDT
mcdazz,, Think this is bad? Just wait a few more months.... Bush should have been in prison years ago...

I guess it's now a statement of our culture, the incompetent & dishonorable rule.
Reply to this comment
by June 11, 2007 9:26 PM EDT
j-whitman wrote:

"Now Bush is arming the insurgents, I guess he can't biitch anymore & lie about Iran supplying insurgents"

I wonder if he realizes that arming the insurgents/sunnis/whoever-wants-a-gun, that he's only adding to the destabilization of Iraq and that his actions will only contribute to the death and destruction of Iraqi civilians and infrastructure?

Just when we thought it was bad, it gets worse.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 11, 2007 9:06 PM EDT
Now Bush is arming the insurgents,,, I guess he can't biitch anymore & lie about Iran supplying insurgents --
- He still doesn't tell America what most Americans allready know,,,, Al Quida & the Taliban are enemy's of Iran & supplied/funded by Arab Sunni's.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman June 11, 2007 9:00 PM EDT
3 American soldiers died because there wasn't enough troops to defend the bridge & probably lack of adaquate equipment for the job.

What's Bush's plan now ?? --- Spread them out even thinner & not expidite up to date equipment.
Reply to this comment
See all 173 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (293 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: