Comments on: Muslim Peacekeeping Force For Iraq?

Pakistani President Proposes Multi-National, All Muslim Contingent, Removal Of "Outside Interference"

Add a Comment See all 99 Comments
by diplomacy3 May 15, 2007 6:32 PM EDT
What an idea by President Musharraf!

Does he needs an international peace keeping force to curb the current judicial crisis and bombing in Pakistan?
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 15, 2007 6:29 PM EDT
Its time to defeat facist nazi islam once and for all.lars008;

How do you plan to do this? Bush can't even come up with a plan to secure Baghdad, much less Iraq.

Who do you consider the FACIST NAZI ISLAM?

Maybe you would like to let the world know how you plan to achieve this feat.
Reply to this comment
by tomflint69 May 15, 2007 6:26 PM EDT
lars008, if we start thinking in your way, I am afraid that our soldiers will have to live in Iraq forever.
Reply to this comment
by tomflint69 May 15, 2007 6:22 PM EDT
lars008, if we start thinking in your way, I am afraid that our soldiers will have to live in Iraq forever.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 May 15, 2007 6:06 PM EDT
GREAT IDEA!

Bush has said many times that if someone come up with a better plan for Iraq, he would give it consideration.

Well here it is. GREAT Idea, Bush and his cronies should jump at the idea.

Bush can claim it was his Idea, and Cheney, Rice, can say they brokered the idea with Mursharraf, under the orders of the President.

WA-LA: Bush, gets out of Iraq, and saves face, and adds to his legacy, and Historical standings.

Only one problem. Bush and his cronies cannot make any more money by stealing from the American tax payers. I'm sure he will find a way.
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 May 15, 2007 6:04 PM EDT
what do you call an organization that:

kills you if you don't join it...

http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=82201&ln=eng&txt=islam%20law%20kill%20kaafir

kills you if you leave it...

http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=696&ln=eng&txt=kaafir%20kill

kills you if you don't do what they tell you to do..

http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=6035&ln=eng&txt=kaafir%20kill

kills you if you speak against it%u2026.

http://islamqa.com/index.php?QR=22809&ln=eng

kills anybody that is not a member of it...

http://www.hauns.com/~DCQu4E5g/koran5.html

still practices pagan rituals...

http://answering-islam.org/Silas/pagansources.htm

allows the r a p e of babies and animals...

http://www.homa.org/default.asp?TOCID=2083225445

a. satanic cult???
b. islam???
c. all the above???

Our Prophet commanded us to fight the kaafirs when we are able and to attack them in their homelands and to give them three choices before we enter their lands: either they become Muslim and be like us, sharing our rights and duties; or they pay the jizyah (poll tax) and feel themselves subdued; or they fight, in which case their wealth, women, children and homes become permissible as booty for the Muslims.
http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=13759&ln=eng&txt=before%20islam%20arabia%20pagan
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 May 15, 2007 5:56 PM EDT
A muslim UN force would be a very good thing for us.
Posted by SusanHelit at 02:52 PM : May 15, 2007

NOT!!! they would leave the fascist nazi islamic muslim global jihadists free to plan and execute attacts on non muslims around the globe...

Our Prophet commanded us to fight the kaafirs when we are able and to attack them in their homelands and to give them three choices before we enter their lands: either they become Muslim and be like us, sharing our rights and duties; or they pay the jizyah (poll tax) and feel themselves subdued; or they fight, in which case their wealth, women, children and homes become permissible as booty for the Muslims.
http://islamqa.com/index.php?ref=13759&ln=eng&txt=before%20islam%20arabia%20pagan
Reply to this comment
by ivandrago May 15, 2007 5:55 PM EDT
The plan could work. The multinationals could take on the Sunnis, while the Iraq forces took on the Shiite insurgents. The U.S. could go low profile, and just monitor the situation. Hope it works out.
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit May 15, 2007 5:52 PM EDT
Good deal, about time.

It's a simple fact that we've been their enemy too long, they're too paranoid about our intentions. No matter what we do, it'll be slanted negatively - we'd do the same if they were occupying us. But set a muslim force there, and they'll be more comfortable, and take from them what they'd never take from us.

Just think about it - we're occupied, soldiers standing on your block, running road checkpoints. How quick will you be to believe a nasty rumor about them if they are from Afghanistan? How quick will you be to believe the exact same rumor if they are from England?

A muslim UN force would be a very good thing for us.
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 May 15, 2007 5:45 PM EDT
NOW CAN WE KILL THEM???

if it is ok for fascist nazi islamic muslims to kill all non muslims everywhere.... is it ok for the non muslims to kill all fascist nazi islamic muslims???

Wouldn't killing 5.1 BILLION people (the number of non muslims in the world) be the very definition of barbarism???
Or is it fascist nazi islam%u2019s way of solving global warming???

Switching Sides: Inside The Enemy Camp

But then in 2000, well before his arrest, something happened which would make Abas question everything he believed in: a fatwa, a religious edict, was issued by Osama bin Laden.

"It should be understood that killing Americans and Jews anywhere found are the highest act of worship and the highest form of good deeds in the eyes of Allah," Simon quotes bin Laden.

Abas and his fellow commanders were ordered to read the fatwa to their men and make sure they carried it out. The others obeyed, but Abas refused. It was his moment of truth. He firmly believed that jihad was to be fought only on the battlefield in defense of Islam; he had always been taught that the killing of civilians had nothing to do with holy war and that it was forbidden.

The fatwa justified killing non-Muslim civilians everywhere.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/04/60minutes/main2761108.shtml?source=RSSattr=60Minutes_2761108
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat May 15, 2007 5:43 PM EDT
Quote

"An Iranian army in Iraq for peacekeeping purposes is not something the U.S. will accept under the circumstances."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unnamed Western diplomat
-This diplomat is so young that his parents have not had time to give him a name... too much pressure on him. Poor little baby...
Reply to this comment
by diplomacy3 May 15, 2007 5:41 PM EDT
superchez1

You thought the muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan were animals that we went after them to slaughter. Now our Congressmen are calling Iraq a "meat grinder" for our soldiers. How would you describe it? Do you agree?
Reply to this comment
by macusweil May 15, 2007 5:36 PM EDT
What freaking brilliant idea!! .. Someone give that man a gold star!!

Bush Jr and the GOP lead Congress with $500,000,000,000 dollars and 130,000 troops have done nothing but create open flame from a smoldering civil war left over from the first gulf conflict under Bush Sr.
Reply to this comment
by randalds May 15, 2007 5:14 PM EDT
I think it's a fantastic idea! Along with the fact that it'll get our troops out of the middle of this insane civil war that Bush started, it'll also show the Muslim world the single most important thing to all of them, that we do not plan to have a permanent military presence in Iraq. Bush says we don't, but of course he's a liar and invading Iraq was expressly for the purpose of building permanent bases there so we can intimidate and/or invade Iran and Syria, despite White House denials of this obvious fact. Still if Bush says we have no designs on staying militarily in Iraq permanently then now is the time for him to put up or shut up. Prove it George! Here's your chance!
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 May 15, 2007 4:43 PM EDT
Appeal for Redress
Sign this Appeal.
This site is an Appeal For Redress in support of our mission in Iraq.
An Appeal For Redress is an authorized means for active duty military to submit a grievance to Congress. It can be signed by Active Duty, Reserve, or National Guard military personnel.
It is authorized by DoD Directive 1325.6 and DoD Directive 7050.6.
The wording of the Appeal for Redress is:
As an American currently serving my nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to fully support our mission in Iraq and halt any calls for retreat. I also respectfully urge my political leaders to actively oppose media efforts which embolden my enemy while demoralizing American support at home. The War in Iraq is a necessary and just effort to bring freedom to the Middle East and protect America from further attack.
If you are active duty, reservist or national guard, please Sign this Appeal.
Most service members fully support the war in Iraq and feel calls to retreat by Congress and attacks by our media on our conduct and mission act to motivate our enemy while demoralizing our support at home, directly increasing the threat we face and resulting in greater American casualties. This Appeal for Redress provides a way in which individual service members can appeal to Congress to fully support us and actively oppose media attacks on our mission and our morale.
This Appeal will be delivered to members of Congress.
http://www.appealforcourage.org/
Reply to this comment
by rsoxfan1123 May 15, 2007 4:38 PM EDT
A Trojan horse?
Reply to this comment
by archangelric May 15, 2007 4:36 PM EDT
Now wait a minute guys, lets be open to the concept: a multinational muslim force taking over security duties in Iraq (and possibly, if it can establish itself as a legitimate force, in other middle eastern conflicts)

While this immediately helps the US; consider what it does to Iraq - a legitimate muslim force keeping the peace; a primarily Sunni force getting the Sunni insurgents to stop the killing, the IED's, etc.

Also consider this force as a counterbalance to Iran and their ambitions in the region.

The biggest question to be answered in the next few days is whether the other large Sunni countries buy in to this: Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, etc.
Reply to this comment
by edjohn66 May 15, 2007 4:34 PM EDT
I think Muslims have an unusually high irritability level associated with superchez1's posts.

Is it any wonder the Middle East hates us with rants like superchez's filling up our discussions here in the States?
Reply to this comment
by edjohn66 May 15, 2007 4:30 PM EDT
I think Muslims have an unusually high irritability level associated with superchez1's posts.

Is it any wonder the Middle East hates us with rants like superchez's filling up our discussions here in the States?
Reply to this comment
by tomflint69 May 15, 2007 4:25 PM EDT
We dont have to think that whether Islamic or Pakistani peace keeping force will pass or fail in Iraq. We need to save our troops and money. Those who think that our soldiers are for free and be crushed like carrots, they are with -tive thinking to stay in Iraq.
Reply to this comment
See all 99 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

    (337 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: