Comments on: Iranian Walks Out Of Dinner With Condi
Claims Female Violinist Was Dressed Too Revealingly; Also Blames U.S. For Iraq Turmoil
Add a Comment See all 340 Comments
- radio,,, Hypocrites, yes indeed they are.
. But they all have Christian upbringings.. --
- In Germany, Protestants, Methodists, Evangelists etc. all united with Hitler. In 1933 they made him Chanchellor of Germany,, 2 months later Dachau, Buchenwald, Sachsenhausen & Ravensbruck opened... All done by Christians. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by radiob at 05:49 PM : May 05, 2007
Since I do not support the unnecessary and illegal invasion of Iraq, I find no reason to consider Iraqi's resistance fighters to be "enemies" of the US.
Or, those who support them.
Posted by tuckerndfw
I do not and never did support the war in Iraq.The fact remains that Iran is supporting groups in Iraq and elsewhere in the world that are attacking our troops. In Iraq they are playing both sides funding and supplying the Shiites and Sunnis. They are good friends to the Iraqi people to. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by radiob at 05:49 PM : May 05, 2007
Since I do not support the unnecessary and illegal invasion of Iraq, I find no reason to consider Iraqi's resistance fighters to be "enemies" of the US.
Or, those who support them. - Reply to this comment
- And those EFD and the training by the Ouds force are no threat either to our forces?
Iran captures 15 British sailors and is funding insurgents against the British in Basra.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1558228.ece?token=null&offset=12
Irans involvement in Iraq and Al Queda
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article1596821.ece
Al Qaeda Wages Electronic War against US Forces in Iraq
http://www1.debka.com/article.php?aid=1266
No they like us. - Reply to this comment
- radio,,, Yep, & they are our Amecican Christians, mostly raised in Christian families -- Just as bad as the enemy
Posted by j-whitman
Those are not Christians, they are hypocrites. - Reply to this comment
- radiobob,
We have already discussed political rhetoric and I am not inclined to repeat that conversation.
Ahmadinejab's claims are political rhetoric intended for his "base," and are no different than George Bush (or any other politician) with his inflammatory rhetoric.
Nothing you have posted to this point demonstrates that Iran poses a unique, credible threat to the US or anyone else. - Reply to this comment
- radio,,, Yep, & they are our Amecican Christians, mostly raised in Christian families -- Just as bad as the enemy
- Reply to this comment
- Iran's Jews tell us to tone down the rhetoric & threats,,, They support thier own country (Iran) & blame Isreal's Zionists & ours.
Posted by j-whitman at 05:29 PM : May 05, 2007
The fact is that the most rabid, violent Zionists are American Christians and they do not care about Jews, or anyone else.
Which makes it ironic when they try to label Zionist opponents as "anti-Semitic." Zionists are some of the most "anti-Semitic" people on earth.
Their "end times scenario" requires all Jews (and everyone else) to convert to Christianity or be slaughtered. Allegedly by their schizophrenic peace loving warmongering God.
Israelis who support Christian Zionists are cutting their own throats, figuratively speaking. And, Christian Zionists will eventually, if given the chance, literally cut their throats if they refuse to convert. - Reply to this comment
- Part two
Aryan Nations National Director August Kreis writes (www.aryan-nations.org), "We as an organization will also endeavor to aid all those who subvert, disrupt and are (sic) malignant in nature to our enemies. Therefore I offer my most sincere best-wishes to those who wage holy Jihad against the infrastructure of the decadent, weak and Judaic-influenced societal infrastructure of the West. I send a message of thanks and well-wishes to the methods and works of groups on the Islamic front against the jew such as Al-Qaeda and Sheik Usama Bin Ladin, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and to all Jihadis worldwide who fight for the glory of the Khilafah and the downfall of the anti-life and anti-freedom System prevalent on this earth today.
Kreis continues by saying (sic), " I ask our Islamic fellow fighters against jewry to remember the co-operation between Mufti Haj Mohammad Amin al-Husseini and Reichsfuhrer Heinrich Himmler during the last century and to remember that all that is of the past it is our duty to surpass!"
What is the difference between the two? The next thing you will be telling everyone is that no holocaust occured. - Reply to this comment
- Why single out Iran?
These are peaceful words!!!!!
One of its stated objectives is, quite explicitly, to destroy us. At a large %u201CWorld Without Zionism%u201D conference recently in Tehran President Ahmadinejad stated that %u201Ca world without Zionism and America . . . . surely can be achieved.%u201D President Ahmadinejad%u2019s expressed view is that it is his mission to help bring about, by mass killings, conditions for the return of the Mahdi and thereafter the end of the world. The chief of strategy for Ahmadinejad, Hassan Abbassi, has said: %u201CWe have a strategy drawn up for the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization . . . we must make use of everything we have at hand to strike at this front by means of our suicide operations or means of our missiles. There are 29 sensitive sites in the U.S. and the West. We have already spied on these sites and we know how we are going to attack them. . . . Once we have defeated the Anglo-Saxons the rest will run for cover.%u201D
Part one. - Reply to this comment
- Iran's Jews tell us to tone down the rhetoric & threats,,, They support thier own country (Iran) & blame Isreal's Zionists & ours.
- Reply to this comment
- That does not mean that Iran is not a potential threat to the US. There are more ways than one to attack a country.
Posted by radiob at 04:53 PM : May 05, 2007
Why single out Iran?
Every nation is a "potential threat" to all other nations.
Seems to me Zionists are a far greater threat to other nations than any other single group. Zionists routinely use military force, economic sanctions and other hostile acts against other nations and groups with whom they disagree. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by radiob at 04:53 PM : May 05, 2007
The Soviet Union collapsed primarily due to corruption. There are currently more billionaires in Moscow than any other place on earth.
The claim that Raygun forced them to bankrupt themselves in an arms race is propaganda.
Please cite the date and time of any comment that I made referring to Israel (other than this one).
Thanks.
"Zionism" is a political movement, it is not a race, ethnic group, or religion. And the vast majority of Zionists are American Christians. But, Zionism is not restricted to members of any racial, religious or ethnic group any moreso than Republicans are a racial, religious or ethnic group.
And, it is very clear that you are promoting (repeating) Zionist propaganda.
It appears you should follow your own advice. - Reply to this comment
- Anyone who makes any such claim is engaged in Zionist propaganda.
Posted by tuckerndfw
Perhaps you need a remedial reading lesson as you have yet to understand a single word that I have written.How much clearer can I make this. Iran cannot defeat the US militarily. That does not mean that Iran is not a potential threat to the US. There are more ways than one to attack a country.The Soviets did collapse economically, you actually make a point. Why did they collapse economically? Could it be all of the spending on the military and not having a robust economy to begin with? And why did the Soviets spend all of the money on defense? The only person here that has mention Israel is yourself and as you like to refer to them as Zionist. Is August Krieves a acquantice of yours? That kind of hatred sounds like it to me.I have not espoused hatred towards any group or nation. I will now, all that seek the destruction of any group of individuals, be it ethnic, religious or race are morons and all such individuals should cease to exist. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by radiob at 04:31 PM : May 05, 2007
The US continues to increase its military capabilities today. And there is no "Soviet Union," so your reference to an arms buildup is irrelevant.
The Soviet Union collapsed due to economic reasons unrelated to anything the US was doing.
There were and are far more "evil dictators" around the wold than Saddam Hussein or Ahmadinejab and the media appears to ignore them.
Selectively demonizing opponents of Zionism is propaganda, it is not news. And, the intent of that propaganda is to inspire support for attacks on Zionist opponents, including Saddam Hussein and Ahmadinejab.
There is currently no nation or person on earth who poses a credible threat of overthrowing the US government or "defeating the west." Saddam Hussein posed no such threat, neither does Osama Bin Laden or Ahmadinejab.
Anyone who makes any such claim is engaged in Zionist propaganda. - Reply to this comment
- Do you seriously believe Iran has the ability to defeat the US? No.
Counter measures taken against the Soviets were "unsuccessful"? The Soviets were unsuccessful.
And, I don't recall any Soviet-American war during that time. The "Cold War" was political rhetoric, it was a war of words, not force.
The cold war was political rhetoric? The massive build up of nuclear weapons on both sides was rhetoric? The Cuban missile crisis was rhetoric?
The funding of various groups to fight against the Soviets in Afghanistan were rhetoric? The Soviets controlling Yugoslavia, Poland etc. were rhetoric? The Russian-Afghan war was over what?
Prior to the unnecessary and useless invasion of Iraq, the media, supported by Zionists, the vast majority of whom are American Christians, spent an inordinate amount of resources demonizing Saddam Hussein.
Unneccessary invasion yes, Saddam needed help in being demonized? Saddam was a ruthless tyrant, and was not a reason to invade Iraq.
After 9-11 did the media or the government really need that much help in creating a faux reason for invading Iraq? The "hysteria" mentality of 9-11 sufficed in itself .
Stop reading between the lines and read what is written. You are twisting my words and Ahmadinejad words. - Reply to this comment
- Who made that claim? Awareness of another nations intents is not calling for a invasion. It is keeping ones eye open. The Russians if they could have would have dominated the world.Counter measures were taken against the Russians and they were unsuccessfull.
Posted by radiob at 04:06 PM : May 05, 2007
Counter measures taken against the Soviets were "unsuccessful"?
That's odd. Raygun worshipers claim he single handedly defeated the Soviet Union and those "evil communists."
And, I don't recall any Soviet-American war during that time. The "Cold War" was political rhetoric, it was a war of words, not force.
Prior to the unnecessary and useless invasion of Iraq, the media, supported by Zionists, the vast majority of whom are American Christians, spent an inordinate amount of resources demonizing Saddam Hussein.
Same as they, and you, are now doing with Ahmadinejab.
If you are not attempting to support the effort to overthrow the Iranian government, what is your point?
Do you seriously believe Iran has the ability to defeat the US?
That is one of the most ludicrous ideas Zionists have ever put forth. Second only to the claim Iraq posed an "imminent threat" to the US or the "west." - Reply to this comment
- Yes, we should militarily invade and occupy all nations whose leaders engage in provocative political rhetoric:
Who made that claim? Awareness of another nations intents is not calling for a invasion. It is keeping ones eye open. The Russians if they could have would have dominated the world.Counter measures were taken against the Russians and they were unsuccessfull. - Reply to this comment
- Yes, we should militarily invade and occupy all nations whose leaders engage in provocative political rhetoric:
"In 1956 a British prime minister was on the receiving end. It was a speech to the United Nations by Harold Macmillan that Soviet President Nikita Kruschev famously interrupted by beating his shoe against his desk before shouting to the US representatives "We will bury you".
Source: BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/2368397.stm
If nations invade other nations based on political rhetoric, we might as well dispense with the idea of peaceful coexistence or civilization as we know it. - Reply to this comment
- These are not open to interpetation
One of its stated objectives is, quite explicitly, to destroy us. At a large %u201CWorld Without Zionism%u201D conference recently in Tehran President Ahmadinejad stated that %u201Ca world without Zionism and America . . . . surely can be achieved.%u201D President Ahmadinejad%u2019s expressed view is that it is his mission to help bring about, by mass killings, conditions for the return of the Mahdi and thereafter the end of the world. The chief of strategy for Ahmadinejad, Hassan Abbassi, has said: %u201CWe have a strategy drawn up for the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization . . . we must make use of everything we have at hand to strike at this front by means of our suicide operations or means of our missiles. There are 29 sensitive sites in the U.S. and the West. We have already spied on these sites and we know how we are going to attack them. . . . Once we have defeated the Anglo-Saxons the rest will run for cover.%u201D - Reply to this comment
