Comments on: Nine U.S. Soldiers Killed In Suicide Blast

Elsewhere, At Least 46 Iraqis Die In Multiple Blasts

Add a Comment See all 216 Comments
by mcvet April 24, 2007 12:24 AM EDT
Prett interesting points you make. All liberal defeatist by the way but interesting nonetheless BTW you slapped noone around pal, all you did was get on a computer and announce to everybody that every opinion you have is based on your political affiliation and not the facts.

Posted by cbville72 at 09:17 PM : Apr 23, 2007
+ report abuse

Okay! Would everyone out there please stand and shout BOOOO on Liberals. I know it's stupid but MAYBE these losers will get the idea and shut up. For some reason these Nazi's can't think past blowing people up and they simply can not understand any action or plan that does NOT include Bullying people and blowing people up. That's why they've NEVER been able to win anything, they can't plan and certainly haven't the ability to do much of anything as far as winning is concerned. Now these LOSERS actually BELIEVE that if "Liberal's" will just shut up, the Fuehrer will win in Iraq and Bin Laden will just walk up and surrender! ROFLMAO Sieg Heil STUPID PEOPLE!! ROFLMAO
Reply to this comment
by mcvet April 24, 2007 12:20 AM EDT
Talk all you want just show some f**king backbone.
Posted by freedomisnot at 05:03 PM : Apr 23, 2007

No! Showing BACKBONE would be out there looking for BIN LADEN not bootlicking a Coward like Bush! You Nazi's have always been like this, you accuse the REAL Hero's, the people who REALLY know who the enemy is and how to fight, you clowns have ALWAYS attacked those folks. Why is that? When FDR wanted to go after Hitler, you LOSERS called him the European Mericle. I've never understood that one. The REASON you clowns are losing is simple Sparky. You can't do anything except bully those who you THINK you can bully, thus the attack on a nation that posed no threat to this nation while allowing the REAL enemy to rebuild and get back into business. Strange bunch, you Nazi's... stupid too!! Sieg Heil Y'all.
Reply to this comment
by cbville72 April 24, 2007 12:17 AM EDT
i do know who you are, a chicken hawk neoclown.
i do know where you been.......in the mens john with, foley, limbaugh,lars,didinhalemales,freedunce.
n
you neoclowns are so easy to slap around.
Posted by usadvisor101 at 07:08 PM : Apr 23, 2007

Prett interesting points you make. All liberal defeatist by the way but interesting nonetheless. It is amazing how you continually cast the US in a horrible light on the global stage. I guess in your warped mind, things were better when Slick Willie was the president. Lets forget that the military was left to go to hell under his administration and that he dropped the ball in killing Bin Laden when he was in our sights. I am no hard core republican and Clinton had his good points but he also had a lot of weak points too. Bush is not perfect but he IS a leader and that is more than what can be said of Kerry whom he beat in '04. BTW you slapped noone around pal, all you did was get on a computer and announce to everybody that every opinion you have is based on your political affiliation and not the facts.
Reply to this comment
by mcvet April 24, 2007 12:14 AM EDT
Yes it is a very serious matter to collect information on a civilian population and appropriate checks and balances should be in place but the major issue is "actionable intellegence" and the fact that a lenthly and cumbersome approval process will void the usefulness of that intellegence. Its a sorry situation to be in but the current threats demand that we can respond quickly.
Posted by freedomisnot at 05:26 PM : Apr 23, 2007

Duh?? LOL Now lets see we are building a WALL to keep the PEOPLE of Iraq Appart yet you LOSERS still can't accept the fact that this is a CIVIL War! ROFLMAO Now I understand why you losers back Bush... you're to stupid to back someone who can actually THINK!! Sieg Heil ROFLMAO
Reply to this comment
by mcvet April 24, 2007 12:10 AM EDT
be if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, DC. who are now dead would be alive today.
Posted by lars008 at 02:42 PM : Apr 23, 2007

Posted by processor2 at 07:37 PM : Apr 23, 2007

Now goodness knows I hate to rain on a Super Nazi when they are trying to direct attention away from the Fuehrer and toward Clinton. I know how much you swastika hugging losers LOVE to hate Clinton but aren't the guys who attacked the WTC the First time... aren't they in JAIL? Now Clinton never PROMISED us he'd catch Bin Laden, the MORON a few call a President did that, but WHERE is BIN LADEN? He planned the 2nd attack and the Klan Man DID promise us he'd catch him... Well what's another LIE from Bush? Then what's a loser like this pathetic moron to believe him. ROFLMAO Sieg Heil Y'all. ROFLMAO Dumb as a Box of Rocks!!
Reply to this comment
by mdc76082 April 24, 2007 12:08 AM EDT
ne_patriot7, shhhhh. naughty, naughty. shhhhh.
Reply to this comment
by ne_patriot7 April 23, 2007 11:52 PM EDT
processor2, you are such a f ucking idiot...
Reply to this comment
by jn122736 April 23, 2007 11:33 PM EDT
Maybe if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, DC. who are now dead would be alive today.
Posted by lars008 at 02:42 PM : Apr 23, 2007

Posted by processor2 at 07:37 PM : Apr 23, 2007
--------------------

Lets see if we can follow your logic here. Osama Bin Laden (Al Qaeda) committed all five bombings that you mentioned. And if Clinton had caught him, 911 would not have happened. Is this is the same Bin Laden whose family, the Saudi Bin Ladens, that bush had quietly flown out of the United States immediately after 911? The same Osama Bin Laden that Bush refused to pursue after he had been located in Afghanistan?

Even if you two were correct, bush would have simply found/invented someone else because he needed 911 to get congress to approve the Iraq invasion he had been planning since well before September 11, 2001.

If you think Bush gives a whack about the lost lives of those in the towers and the hijacked planes all you need do is consider how little he cares about the 3300+ military lives he has wasted and continues to waste, not to mention all the wounded.
Reply to this comment
by processor2 April 23, 2007 10:37 PM EDT
After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
Iraqi Complicity in the World Trade Center Bombing and Beyond
http://www.meib.org/articles/010
6_ir1.htm
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9511/saudi_bl
ast/pm/
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9606/25/saudi
.explosion/
After the 1998 bombing of U.S . embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
http://usinfo.state.gov/is/in
ternational_security/terrorism/embassy_b
ombings.html
http://usinfo.state.gov/is
/Archive_Index/International_Media_React
ion_Special_Report_August_14_1998.html

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
http://usinfo.state.gov/is/internation
al_security/terrorism/uss_cole.html
May
be if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, DC. who are now dead would be alive today.
Posted by lars008 at 02:42 PM : Apr 23, 2007
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 April 23, 2007 9:48 PM EDT
"Yes it is a very serious matter to collect information on a civilian population and appropriate checks and balances should be in place but the major issue is "actionable intellegence" and the fact that a lenthly and cumbersome approval process will void the usefulness of that intellegence. Its a sorry situation to be in but the current threats demand that we can respond quickly." - Posted by freedomisnot at 05:26 PM : Apr 23, 2007

That problem was foreseen a long time ago.

A FISA court order can be obtained later, and they can do the surveillance at once, when time demands it.

If FISA turned it down after the fact (and rarely has that ever happened) then the info could not be used in a trial, but that doesn't mean the Feds would have to forget what they had learned about anybody's future plans.

So what you're talking about is a non-issue.
Reply to this comment
by randalds April 23, 2007 9:32 PM EDT
"At Least 46 Die In Multiple Blasts"

More blood and murders on Bush's hands. You know it's stories like this that make a person positive that Bush is not really a Christian, but just plays one to get votes, because if he really believed in a God then he must know that he'll be spending all eternity roasting in hell for all of the people he's slaughtered and he's too much of a gutless coward to take that chance.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad April 23, 2007 9:25 PM EDT
ANYONE DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN WHO SUPPORTS ISRAELI INTEREST OVER AMERICAN SOLDIERS LIVES DOES NOT DESERVE TO LIVE IN AMERICA!

I am tired of marginalizing all the other millions of good honorable people in the Middle East because Israel had it rough in Europe before I was born! So why must America in isolation support Israel blindly above all the rest of the people in the middle east, just because they do not play well in the sand box together? 50 years of American sacrifice is enough! America must become an honest broker in the Middle East or pull out all together! America can honor its commitments with our Allies but there must be a true unbiased commitment on America%u2019s part in the Region. There will never be peace as long as America intervenes on behalf of Israel at the expense of the Millions of other good people in the Middle East! All the parties involved will never come to agreement if we are constantly pulling their cookies out of the fire every time they get into trouble either! It is not anti Semitic to believe that there are other good people in the Middle East and they should have a voice! You can see by the AIPAC advertisement below this PAC is selling influence to American Elected officials. If you follow the money trail you will find that most of those elected officials who support the war in Iraq are under the influence of AIPAC.

http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm
Reply to this comment
by bm6005 April 23, 2007 9:08 PM EDT
Oh, so you don't mind if Israel gets attacked. Aren't we selective. Duh.
Posted by mudrose

Why should I care if Israel is attacked? Come on tell me now. Has their propaganda convinced you or are you just another AIPAC supporter/believer??
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 April 23, 2007 8:36 PM EDT
"Were you alive during this time???? Paying attention???? Clinton ignored the problem remember "its the economy stupid". By doing nothing he allowed the threat to grow and just because some website disputes clear as day well known facts you accept that??? Stick your head back in the sand"
- Posted by freedomisnot at 03:16 PM : Apr 23, 2007

It's a lot of b.s. from right wing websites. Of course I was alive at the time.

The Federal anti-terrorism budget tripled on his watch.

Clinton could multi-task too. The economy didn't preempt other issues.

Here is a rundown on the facts. Feel free to dispute them.

"Republicans Sabotaged Clinton's Anti-Terror Efforts"

http://www.mikehersh.com/Republicans_sabotaged_Clintons_Anti-Terror_Efforts.shtml
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 23, 2007 8:28 PM EDT
See ya, back to the news,,,
, If you Bushies watched the news, you'd know the UAE is funding insurgents in Iraq & funding the Taliban,, And the USA is investing in the UAE -- Funding terrorism
Reply to this comment
by freedomisnot April 23, 2007 8:26 PM EDT
whitman.....Iraq is connected to our freedom
If the terrorist take control of the country and the oil revenue they will have a vast increase in funding

Pres Bush does not fund anything that is the job of Congress

Yes it is a very serious matter to collect information on a civilian population and appropriate checks and balances should be in place but the major issue is "actionable intellegence" and the fact that a lenthly and cumbersome approval process will void the usefulness of that intellegence. Its a sorry situation to be in but the current threats demand that we can respond quickly.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 23, 2007 8:25 PM EDT
Lars,,, Are you inventing posts now for others ??? That wasn't me, that was you that posted this BS --
- You're not old enough to remember the Neo-con's "communist where going to take over our country: ---- (Comminism Bush sold us out too)

Posted by j-whitman at 05:03 PM : Apr 23, 2007
are you ready to live under islam rule as a non muslim??? --- Was Posted By Lars008



Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 April 23, 2007 8:18 PM EDT
jihad j...... this guy will listen to you.... hahahaha

Man Gets 5,000 Calls After YouTube Post

Need To Talk? Mass. Man Offers His Sympathetic Ear In An Internet Video

Ryan Fitzgerald is unemployed, lives with his father and has a little bit of time on his hands.

So, he decided to offer his ear, to anyone who wants to call. After posting a video with his cell phone number on YouTube on Friday, the 20-year-old told The Boston Globe he has received more than 5,000 calls and text messages.

Fitzgerald said he wanted to "be there," for anyone who needed to talk. "I never met you, but I do care," a spiky-haired Fitzgerald said into the camera on his YouTube posting.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/04/23/tech/main2715734.shtml?source=mostpop_story
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 April 23, 2007 8:14 PM EDT
Posted by j-whitman at 05:03 PM : Apr 23, 2007

are you ready to live under islam rule as a non muslim???

apartheid islam style

Rights of Non-Muslims in an Islamic State
http://www.sullivan-county.com/id3/islamic_state.htm
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman April 23, 2007 8:11 PM EDT
freedomisnot,,,, Iraq has absoultly nothing to do with our Freedoms --- While we are talking, Bush is demanding more domestic spying & reduced regulation....
. Bush is still underfunding our military, veterans, Homeland Security & more.....
Reply to this comment
See all 216 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (299 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: