3 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MisfitGeek says:
Maybe analyzing the debate should be about the debate and not your own opinions about whether the economic programs proposed would actually work.

REPORTING the news is not about MAKING the news.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Alden845 says:
Does anyone in the media take there job seriously anymore. I mean first we hear from Julianna Goldman, who tries to tell us that Obama "pivoted" from one point to the next. Seriously Julianna? I don't know what you were watching but what I saw and most of the country saw was Obama slugging along just trying to keep up with Romney. And by the way, Obama didn't bring up the "47%" or Romney's "tax rate" so why are you mentioning it in post debate analysis, unless your just upset it wasn't brought up.

Then you trot out Rana Foroohar, who had her Obama pom poms as she gave her analysis. it was all "Romney has a math problem", and "cutting taxes doesn't create jobs" rhetoric. She was reading the dam Obama talking points! Come on people, how long do we have to put up with this trash can journalism. Where is the critique on Obama's last four years? Not a word? Nothing?

What we need are serous journalist who ask both sides tough questions and report there answers, not prepared talking points! Who knows, maybe Obama would have won this debate or at least broke even if journalist would challenge him with a tough question every so often.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
plusaf says:
Dear CBS... This is a fast, internet world...
Your ads that interrupt the flow of that world for more than five or ten seconds are abominations.

Thank goodness you can't yet control the Mute button on my mouse...
reply