Having read all the comments it seems there is about 75% are all saying "Were is all the evidence" and I agree. He should never have been found guilty and it is scary to think that he was. This jury has a lot to answer for. I hope he does lodge an appeal for a new trial.
I hate when people use religion to defend their guilt. He & his now wife should leave God out of it. He wanted a new wife that wasn't fat & wanted to keep his standing in the community. She may have not been domestic as he wanted but you can tell he was more worried about his image and not about their relationship.
He's guilty and his time will come beyond the veil.
I have been a 'church-people'. These two look like they hide behind the whole 'church' thing. That is not what God is all about. Talk about hiding your light.
His behavior during the 911 call was odd, this guy is a medical doctor and an anesthesiologist, he should be an expert in CPR and airway management, yet he did not seem to act decisively. I think he is a control freak who did not want to lose big dollars in a divorce. If she had died in this unsual manner and the issues in marriage were not present it would not seem like a murder, but the reality is something fishy happened and there was a motive.
A few things, the psychiatrist wife says that she "can read people pretty well" yet she's married to a man that had a sex change. Not that there's anything wrong with that seems like a weird comment for her.
I think he did it, I don't think he did it in a way that he thinks is guilty. I think there truly was a leak but he woke up and knew it and just let her die. Seems weird that they'd act like he was "truly asleep" and woken by the CO2 device if it was premeditated. He'd also be wiser about the things that he wrote in his journal. I think instead that the CO2 went off and he was in a protected zone and just let the accident unfold and left it in "God's hands" to save her, let it be his will and he waited until she was dead to call 911. Seems like the most logical explanation to me.
I don't think any of the crap in his journal was relevant--could easily be interpreted differently from how the prosecution represented it. But what is the explanation for the fact that nothing was wrong with the heater, hot water heater, or fireplace--the only possible sources of accidental carbon monoxide poisoning? That's the crux of the matter for me. It is also very coincidental that he happened to be sleeping with a window open in another room; why wouldn't his wife have her window open too, if it was warm enough for him to have the window open? And he certainly had motive if his own story is accurate about how she was running up credit cards, she was such a ***** and he was so innocent, etc. Why did he lie about not knowing anything about carbon monoxide? But the prosecution really screwed up by making up a random theory about how he supposedly killed her with exhaust from the RV, etc. That was ridiculous and will certainly provide good fodder for an appeal. The issue is simply: how did she die if he didn't kill her? It wasn't an accident, since there was nothing wrong with the household systems.
BTW, he certainly sounded very coherent to me on the 911 call, not at all slurring his speech or seeming mentally foggy, so I also have a lot of difficulty buying his story that he was affected by carbon monoxide poisoning. And as such, that's an utterly inadequate excuse for failing to engage in any kind of basic medical response despite many, many years of working as an anesthesiologist.
I was shocked at the verdict. These people obviously had marital problems but as the detective said, they both did things to get under each other's skin. They did things to each other as a retaliation to each other but murder? My heart goes out to Kathy's family but it makes me sad at how eager they all were to point blame at someone for their loss. If her boys had been there they'd argued they helped the dad kill her. This wasn't justice, this was an outright moral judgement. They convicted this guy for being outspoken about his unappy marriage and decisions he made after her death, and not on real evidence. Shame on you!
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
He's guilty and his time will come beyond the veil.
I think he did it, I don't think he did it in a way that he thinks is guilty. I think there truly was a leak but he woke up and knew it and just let her die. Seems weird that they'd act like he was "truly asleep" and woken by the CO2 device if it was premeditated. He'd also be wiser about the things that he wrote in his journal. I think instead that the CO2 went off and he was in a protected zone and just let the accident unfold and left it in "God's hands" to save her, let it be his will and he waited until she was dead to call 911. Seems like the most logical explanation to me.