3 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
NinthSt78 says:
In the first debate, it appeared as though someone may have been in need of a cigarette to improve his concentration and focus. The second debate had a considerably different appearance. For those of us who have tried both sides of the argument and decided one way or the other based on personal experience, the chances of convincing otherwise are very, very slim.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fairlyplayed says:
I would like to post this link to the presidents speech on september 12, 2012 in the rose garden regarding Libya and point out that Govonor Romney was CORRECT he did not call the events in Libya an "act of terror" in fact the ony time he says that phrase is when he says "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this greatnation, alter that chacter, or ecipse the light of the values that we stand for." but he DOES NOT reffer to Libya as an act of terror... watch for yourself!! http://youtu.be/3Nu6VZ9DeVc
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
knbt says:
It bothers me that people wish they were "better off" that what Obama brought us. How can you measure that? What do you expect after such a major recession since Bush? Thanks to Obama, we could be much worse off than we are now! It bothers me that there is a lack of gratitude for that. I'm tired of hearing the same old story from people, they want to be better off, when they don't see they already are! I think we are better off in many ways than where we could have been since the Bush administration. Obama still has my vote!!
reply