Comments on: America Remembers Sept. 11

Prayers, Silence, Bells At Ground Zero, White House, Pentagon, Rural Pa., Elsewhere

Add a Comment See all 46 Comments
by red164 September 11, 2007 10:27 PM EDT
see the real danger that we are living with.

Posted by libsluvsuvs at 04:00 PM : Sep 11, 2007

OF COURSE THEY DO

IT''s TRUE

PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11

Section V of Rebuilding America''s Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow''s Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11


President Bush continues to read my pet goat
While America is under attack then disappears for the rest of the day

Richard Cheney Bush Administration Vice President
9/11 RUNS WAR GAMES

Donald Rumsfeld Department of Defense (2001-2006) Secretary of Defense
AT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11

BUSH CHENEY OPPOSE 9/11 Investigation

BUSH/CHENEY REFUSE TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH OR IN PUBLIC NO TRANSCRIPT CHENEY INSISTS THEY BE INTERVIEWED TOGETHER

Project for the New American Century - SourceWatchPNAC''s policy document, "Rebuilding America''''''''s Defences," openly advocates for total global military domination. Many PNAC members hold highest-level ...
www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title




=Project_for_the_New_American_Ce
nt
ur
y - 82k -


Associations with Bush administration
After the 2000 election of George W. Bush, 17, 17, 17 PNAC''s members or signatories were appointed to key positions within the President''s administration:

Reply to this comment
by red164 September 11, 2007 10:23 PM EDT
see the real danger that we are living with.

Posted by libsluvsuvs at 04:00 PM : Sep 11, 2007

OF THEY DO


Section V of Rebuilding America''''s Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow''''s Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11


President Bush continues to read my pet goat
While America is under attack then disappears for the rest of the day

Richard Cheney Bush Administration Vice President
9/11 RUNS WAR GAMES

Donald Rumsfeld Department of Defense (2001-2006) Secretary of Defense
AT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11

BUSH CHENEY OPPOSE 9/11 Investigation

BUSH/CHENEY REFUSE TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH OR IN PUBLIC NO TRANSCRIPT CHENEY INSISTS THEY BE INTERVIEWED TOGETHER

Project for the New American Century - SourceWatchPNAC''''s policy document, "Rebuilding America''''s Defences," openly advocates for total global military domination. Many PNAC members hold highest-level ...
www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title



=Project_for_the_New_American_Cent
ur
y - 82k -


Associations with Bush administration
After the 2000 election of George W. Bush, 17, 17, 17 PNAC''''s members or signatories were appointed to key positions within the President''''s administration:
Reply to this comment
by nggr September 11, 2007 10:05 PM EDT
-Ditto. That''''s freedom. Something we still do have that allot of countries do not have.
Posted by singinrick at 06:58 PM : Sep 11, 2007

proud to be an american and live in peace with all you americans out there.
Reply to this comment
by micma-2009 September 11, 2007 9:41 PM EDT


WHERE IS BIN LADEN? WHY ARE WE SPENDING TRILLIONS IN IRAQ WHEN HE''S RUNNING FREE, BUILDING AL QAEDA, PLANNING NEW ATTACKS, AND EVEN DOING PRESS RELEASES?


HOW DOES THIS HONOR THE VICTIMS OF 9/11?




Reply to this comment
by Krazcarl September 11, 2007 9:26 PM EDT
GunOwnerDan terrorist don''t care if your armed the sorry excuse for human flesh plan to die anyway. Bin has his boys thinking that will go to heaven get girls looked up to and we all know how dangerous religious fanatics are we''ve seen that here from our own citizens he just has camps and a network. On the other hand if I ever ran into him I''d want you by my side.
Reply to this comment
by nggr September 11, 2007 9:25 PM EDT
Posted by singinrick at 05:25 PM : Sep 11, 2007

rick,
as vehemently as i disagree with your views, and as heated as the posting gets on various stories on this site, I am glad that we live in a country where we can voice dissent and disagree without violence.

so, saying that,
may darwin bless you!

just kidding.

this tragedy affects all of us, and we are americans.
noone wants the bad guys to win, but we really should investigate further who the bad guys are.
and treat them accordingly
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan September 11, 2007 8:33 PM EDT

Terrorists Love Defenseless Victims.

How else can they murder thousands of people using BOX-CUTTERS?

Reply to this comment
by nggr September 11, 2007 8:25 PM EDT
this site tends to anger the people with the opinion onf explosives planted in the building. however, it puts for reasonable explanations for no explosives, and at the same time puts the real conspracy in context to the events before and after.

http://debunking911.com/index.html

like i said, i went for years thinking that thermite was used because it really seemed like the only reasonable explanation. after viewing this site and other research i was a ble to put that belif to reat, and concentrate on the real conspiracy of either complicity by the administration or the possibility of U.S. government involvment in the planning.
these options take away the "to many people in th set up" argument.
it makes more sense to me.
anuway, i am with you on the administrations complicity, and can even concede some active povernment role in the planning and exicution of the attack

respect to you though, for not being blind.
Reply to this comment
by nggr September 11, 2007 8:17 PM EDT
Posted by BareEmperor at 04:55 PM : Sep 11, 2007

i too found WTC 7 suspicious. however, i changed my thinking when i saw a video taken by firemen around 100 p.m. of that day.
the video shows the damage to the back of the building. it is virtually shredded, and at 2 p.m. the fire fighters already knew the building was too unstable to stand much longer, they evacuated because of the shifting of the building.
most video evidence you see show the side of the building and gives the impression that the damage was limited.
if you watch the video i am speaking of, you can witness extensive damage, and you can hear the firemen talk about evacuation because of the reports by their fellow firefighters inside the building.
then if you look at the aerial shot after the collapse you can see that the building collapsed towards the side of the damage.
my opinion now is not that there were explosives in the towers and wtc7.
however that is not to say that i dont think bush either knew and let it happen, or at the very least took advantage of the tragedy to implement a plan that had been in the works for at least a decade.

here is the link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U

Reply to this comment
by bareemperor September 11, 2007 7:55 PM EDT
For those of you who didn''t realize WTC7 also fell on 9/11, here is an interesting link. BBC was broadcasting about the destruction of the Salomon Brothers Building(WTC7) 20 minutes before it was demolished! The reporter moves her head, and there is the building, standing tall.
Was she reading a bad script, or was it bad timing? The 9/11 Commission never saw the film, I will bet...

Worth your time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eprisonplanet%2Ecom%2Farticles%2Ffebruary2007%2F260207building7%2Ehtm
Reply to this comment
See all 46 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: