If laws were broken, the police needs to get involved. Parents are hounding the school administration to see if they can sue them for ignorant actions of their OWN CHILDREN.
Rah rah CBS, promoting kids who get undressed. Shameful journalism when there are REAL stories to report. Also the reason that the punishment was severe.
All the arguments are nice, but the bottom line is this: without these skanky girls taking naked pictures of themselves, there would BE no naked pictures to circulate. Leave the blame where it lies and stop trying to deflect it, you parents. You should be ashamed of what you've raised.
The case that protects "nudity without more", i.e. innocent naked images is
355 U.S. 372 78 S.Ct. 365 2 L.Ed.2d 352 SUNSHINE BOOK COMPANY and Solar Union Naturisme, Inc., petitioners, v. Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United States. No. 587. Supreme Court of the United States, January 13, 1958 precedent: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
In principle I agree with this.
But hold it there.......
As a naturist, I see naked children and adults weekly. It never crosses my mind that either are "sexual", thereby "obscene", not even the adults. Although I am celibate, this goes equally for the more regularly sexually orientated members of my naturist community, which is incidentally the only community in US and UK society which is not driven by sex and perversion. This last view is actually logical.
The criticism of nude images is solely because the majority, no less than 95% of the US and UK populations I believe, considers the naked body "obscene". In which way is it obscene?
Is it obscene ....in the shower? No! ....whilst asleep on the bed? No! ....at the doctor's, being examined? No! ....whilst changing clothes? No!
In absolute fact, the only context in which the naked body can be "obscene" is a SEXUAL context.
What this means is that every time these critics see nudity, their mindset defaults to sex. They are incapable of seeing nudity without thinking of it. This is the ultimate perversion! In a moral society this would be considered abnormal!
Yes these people, the critics of nudity, are the real perverts!
Moreover if they cannot see a naked body without thinking of sex .....they are a danger bathing their own children! Think about it!
Sadly this implicates the vast majority of our two depraved nations. This is why the US and the UK lead the world in incest.
You people steal your kids' childhood off them, a crime against humanity. You dress them up in provocatively adult attire instead of as kids. Why are they not allowed to be children? Because they do not fit into your incestuous sex games.
You have redesigned your mass media into a pornography juggernaut. There are hardly any longer social venues that are not driven by sexual obsession. All your favourite songs are based around the letter "F". You all go to a therapist if you are not getting laid every night, by as many people as possible. If you are celibate, as I am, you are considered insane.
It is the perverts in dressed society, who have to wear clothes because they cannot be trusted without them, who are to blame for misdemeanours resulting from nudity.
Yours is a sick society!
And this is where the irony comes in.
The problem with naked images, both of children or adults is this; it is the self-styled righteous mainstream perverts who are the danger not those who take the images.
If a female walks naked through a naturist environment she is safe and respected.
If she does the same in clothed society there is hardly one male alive in the US and the UK who would not feel the urge to rape her. That probably goes equally for any teenage girl too.
So....... where does my overall view on public naked images of women and children lie now?
Quite simply, children and women are safe in naturist society, both in images and even live.
But you may be surprised to hear that I OPPOSE the exposure of naked images of our moral lifestyle to a mainstream society, hiding behind clothes, that is morally bankrupt to a man. Most of you people out there are not psychiatrically fit to see them.
Most naturists want to spread their moral gospel, but I want to keep you lot out apart from the few enlightened percent!
I believe it is imperative that, to protect the safety of our naturist women and children, your depraved majority is not even aware we exist.
So there you are..... a commited moralistic naturist is opposed to the public broadcast of images of the naked body. .....and it is you people, a clothed society of rapists & perverts, who are to blame!
What an endgame in the face of blasphemy of God's greatest creation, the naked human body!
Ok, I have read and heard enough about all of this from all points of view. I Usually stay out of things that don't concern me or my family. I was raised a nudist and a christian one at that. However I also have a son and daughter and I don't run around nude in front of them, nor do I allow them to run around nude. I believe it is to each their own. I don't agree that CHILDREN should be allowed to take photos of them selves or other children nude. Much less send them out to other people. In this day of advanced phones, and cameras it makes it especially hard to stop it. Yes most people just figure boys will be boys, I don't agree to that either. I believe in complete equality though and if the girls are going to get punished then so should everyone involved. CHILD PORN IS ILLEGAL NO MATTER OF AGE OR WHO, OR WHAT YOU DO. I have seen on news how they have arrested foreign officials for collecting it. They didn't arrest, or punish the girls that took the photos. If a person is caught with it they get arrested, so why don't they arrest the people who are sending the photos as well as the people taking them. I think they all need to be punished.
Also I read about this on another news sight and people are trying to blame the schools or the teachers. Since when is it the teachers job to raise our kids? I think a lot of these parents need a swift kick in the rear and a good smack across the head to get their brains working. Take responsability, (yeah maybe a typo), for your own children and quite trying to blame everyone else. Maybe if you raised your children with higher standards and morals they wouldn't do these things.
I know that my children are going to act up but I hope never in these type of ways and if so then they better get prepared. The bible itself says "spare the rod not the child". My daughter is 1 and when I tell her to go to bed she lays down and goes to bed. My son is 3 and when I tell him to do something he listens. I believe that if more parents start them out young instead of thinking they have 18 years to try and fix it maybe their kids would grow up proper and correct.
YOU PARENTS THAT HAVE KIDS THAT ARE DOING THESE THINGS OR KIDS THAT ARE SENDING THIS STUFF, YOU NEED TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR SAME AS ANYONE CONDONING IT.
ALSO AS FOR THE 1 AMENDMENT IT ONLY APPLIES TO ADULTS, OR HAVEN"T YOU NOTICED THAT YOU HAVE TO BE 18 TO USE THEM YET?
I tried to use the constitution in my favor when I was 16 and it is clearly stated that you have no rights till 18 years of age. That's why there are parents.
Well from my understanding of the situation, it is not that they were punished, its the fact that 3 additional girls were not. Yes there are 3 more girls involved from what I heard and they received no punishment at all. And yes the school knew apparently since june and did nothing till sept. I think all involved, boys and girls alike should be punished equally.
CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
Well from my understanding of the situation, it is not that they were punished, its the fact that 3 additional girls were not. Yes there are 3 more girls involved from what I heard and they received no punishment at all. And yes the school knew apparently since june and did nothing till sept. I think all involved, boys and girls alike should be punished equally.
CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
Well from my understanding of the situation, it is not that they were punished, its the fact that 3 additional girls were not. Yes there are 3 more girls involved from what I heard and they received no punishment at all. I think all involve, boys and girls alike should be punished equally.
CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Reply to Comment The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.
Kiddie porn Trolls
Leave the blame where it lies and stop trying to deflect it, you parents. You should be ashamed of what you've raised.
355 U.S. 372
78 S.Ct. 365
2 L.Ed.2d 352
SUNSHINE BOOK COMPANY and Solar Union Naturisme, Inc., petitioners,
v. Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United States.
No. 587. Supreme Court of the United States, January 13, 1958
precedent: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)
In principle I agree with this.
But hold it there.......
As a naturist, I see naked children and adults weekly. It never crosses my mind that either are "sexual", thereby "obscene", not even the adults. Although I am celibate, this goes equally for the more regularly sexually orientated members of my naturist community, which is incidentally the only community in US and UK society which is not driven by sex and perversion. This last view is actually logical.
The criticism of nude images is solely because the majority, no less than 95% of the US and UK populations I believe, considers the naked body "obscene". In which way is it obscene?
Is it obscene ....in the shower? No!
....whilst asleep on the bed? No!
....at the doctor's, being examined? No!
....whilst changing clothes? No!
In absolute fact, the only context in which the naked body can be "obscene" is a SEXUAL context.
What this means is that every time these critics see nudity, their mindset defaults to sex. They are incapable of seeing nudity without thinking of it. This is the ultimate perversion! In a moral society this would be considered abnormal!
Yes these people, the critics of nudity, are the real perverts!
Moreover if they cannot see a naked body without thinking of sex .....they are a danger bathing their own children! Think about it!
Sadly this implicates the vast majority of our two depraved nations. This is why the US and the UK lead the world in incest.
You people steal your kids' childhood off them, a crime against humanity. You dress them up in provocatively adult attire instead of as kids. Why are they not allowed to be children? Because they do not fit into your incestuous sex games.
You have redesigned your mass media into a pornography juggernaut. There are hardly any longer social venues that are not driven by sexual obsession. All your favourite songs are based around the letter "F". You all go to a therapist if you are not getting laid every night, by as many people as possible. If you are celibate, as I am, you are considered insane.
It is the perverts in dressed society, who have to wear clothes because they cannot be trusted without them, who are to blame for misdemeanours resulting from nudity.
Yours is a sick society!
And this is where the irony comes in.
The problem with naked images, both of children or adults is this; it is the self-styled righteous mainstream perverts who are the danger not those who take the images.
If a female walks naked through a naturist environment she is safe and respected.
If she does the same in clothed society there is hardly one male alive in the US and the UK who would not feel the urge to rape her. That probably goes equally for any teenage girl too.
So....... where does my overall view on public naked images of women and children lie now?
Quite simply, children and women are safe in naturist society, both in images and even live.
But you may be surprised to hear that I OPPOSE the exposure of naked images of our moral lifestyle to a mainstream society, hiding behind clothes, that is morally bankrupt to a man. Most of you people out there are not psychiatrically fit to see them.
Most naturists want to spread their moral gospel, but I want to keep you lot out apart from the few enlightened percent!
I believe it is imperative that, to protect the safety of our naturist women and children, your depraved majority is not even aware we exist.
So there you are..... a commited moralistic naturist is opposed to the public broadcast of images of the naked body. .....and it is you people, a clothed society of rapists & perverts, who are to blame!
What an endgame in the face of blasphemy of God's greatest creation, the naked human body!
Also I read about this on another news sight and people are trying to blame the schools or the teachers. Since when is it the teachers job to raise our kids? I think a lot of these parents need a swift kick in the rear and a good smack across the head to get their brains working. Take responsability, (yeah maybe a typo), for your own children and quite trying to blame everyone else. Maybe if you raised your children with higher standards and morals they wouldn't do these things.
I know that my children are going to act up but I hope never in these type of ways and if so then they better get prepared. The bible itself says "spare the rod not the child". My daughter is 1 and when I tell her to go to bed she lays down and goes to bed. My son is 3 and when I tell him to do something he listens. I believe that if more parents start them out young instead of thinking they have 18 years to try and fix it maybe their kids would grow up proper and correct.
YOU PARENTS THAT HAVE KIDS THAT ARE DOING THESE THINGS OR KIDS THAT ARE SENDING THIS STUFF, YOU NEED TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR SAME AS ANYONE CONDONING IT.
ALSO AS FOR THE 1 AMENDMENT IT ONLY APPLIES TO ADULTS, OR HAVEN"T YOU NOTICED THAT YOU HAVE TO BE 18 TO USE THEM YET?
I tried to use the constitution in my favor when I was 16 and it is clearly stated that you have no rights till 18 years of age. That's why there are parents.
CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.