Comments on: Hero Nanny Saved Baby Amid Mumbai Horror
The Early Show Exclusive: Woman Rescued 2-Year-Old As Terrorists Raided Home
- You don''t need religion to make good people behave well and you don''t need religion for bad people to do bad things, but you do need religion to make good people do bad things.
I second DaGrandma''s Jim Jones reference. There are plenty of "evil" people out there who call themselves Christians and truly believe they are, but do not follow in Christ''s teachings in any sense of the word. And as far as bragging rights is concerned, Christianity still holds the record for the longest lasting and most vicious opression of people - called the Inquisition - so let''s not have any "holy-er-than-though" statements made by Christians.
The proof of a clear conscience is deep untroubled sleep. The proof of a short memory span is deep untroubled sleep. - Reply to this comment
- "peaceloving religion" is what the murderers''pals fondly cites here again & again...while posting under/pretending as anglo-saxon/christian/hindu/jewish identity....pity on these shameless imposters
- Reply to this comment
- Concern,care for the young,the weak''ll never be felt,understood by these murderers,their wretched supporters,-they only know to kill,thievery,beggary,treachery..(inventing any fancy reason)..then lastly they''ll kill each other & then their sould will fry in hell for eternity.
- Reply to this comment
- Muslims peace loving people. Tell me another story. Even in Rome there are mosques. Can you imagine a church anywhere in soudi Arabia? Peace loving people indeed!
Posted by gangesdak
To assume there are no peace loving Muslims is a gross generalization! While it''s true Saudi Arabia has an oppressive government where the only allowed religion is Islam, in Indonesia, with the largest Muslim population in the world, Protestantism, Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Confucianism are also recognized and allowed to practice. There are extremists everywhere, but that does not mean they represent the mainstream. - Reply to this comment
- What I meant was, No %u201CReligion%u201D %u201Cpromotes%u201D this type of behavior
- Reply to this comment
- Muslims peace loving people. Tell me another story. Even in Rome there are mosques. Can you imagine a church anywhere in soudi Arabia? Peace loving people indeed!
- Reply to this comment
- This is to "DaVicar1"
so I guess its a good thing that little Moshe''le is not Muslim so he wont strap explosives on himself at the age of 15.
Who else did you hear around the world doing this type of nonsence but Muslims. - Reply to this comment
- Posted by MaharajaG at 10:35 AM : Dec 05, 2008
You are joking, right? I mean, ACCIDENTALLY? A couple people killed by a MISTAKE? - Reply to this comment
- "Just because couple of people got killed by Muslims accidentally does not mean Muslims are Not peace loving."
In the first place, these people were NOT killed "accidentally." When someone comes in with guns attacking and killing, it is NOT "accidental."
In the second place, Muslims'' own holy book, the KU''RAN, says that anyone who is NOT a Muslim is an INFIDEL and, if the person does not agree to convert to Islam, you MUST KILL that person. Where is THAT a religion of "peace??"
We have had this lie shoved down our throats, hoping we will believe it. Well, those of us who know the TRUTH do NOT! - Reply to this comment
- The proof that Muslims are not peace loving is %u201Cthat the Muslim World are generally passive to these type of attacks and they don%u2019t denounce it%u201D.
- Reply to this comment
- Just because couple of people got killed by Muslims accidentally does not mean Muslims are Not peace loving.
Every one make mistakes. Just a few young people made mistake in bomb blasts does not make Mulims Not peace loving people.
You dont need proof to see the Muslims loves people from all religion. It is everywhere and obvious, Only you know HOW to see it.
Posted by MaharajaG
A couple of people. Over 170 dead and over 200 wounded is not just a couple of dead people. Would it just be a couple of dead people if your family was killed by the Muslim terrorists. You credibility is at zero. Try again. And where is the outcry from the Muslims condemming terrorism? - Reply to this comment
- We should stop tarring everyone with the same brush. Of course there are all these bad muslims, but that does not make every Muslim bad. Remember the bombers in Northern Ireland who killed many people - they were all christians, albeit, different denominations. The Basques are still using bombs and even if not bombs, by other means. There are bad apples everywhere. However, it is also true that a lot of these groups are now fomented in Islamic countries with their government turning a blind eye to them. That is why they have been able to plan and carry out their heinous acts.
- Reply to this comment
- Just because couple of people got killed by Muslims accidentally does not mean Muslims are Not peace loving.
Every one make mistakes. Just a few young people made mistake in bomb blasts does not make Mulims Not peace loving people.
You dont need proof to see the Muslims loves people from all religion. It is everywhere and obvious, Only you know HOW to see it. - Reply to this comment
- Just curious, since she''''s Indian, wouldn''''t the correct term be amah instead of nanny?
--------------------------
Posted by NMlost at 09:29 AM : Dec 05, 2008
''Amma'' is an term/address that a child/son/daughter uses to call his/her mother. ''Amma'' is used in mostly rural or amoung old fashioned Indians.
The correct/popular/more term used for mother is ''Maa''. In Sanskrit (which is real Hindu language) it is "Matra"
for ''Nanny'' the correct term would be ''Dai'' or ''Dai Maa''. - Reply to this comment
- MUSLIMS ARE VERY NICE PEOPLE. THEY ALWAYS SPREAD SO MUCH LOVE TO PEOPLE OF ALL RELIGION.
Tell me if I am wrong.
------------------------------------------------------Posted by MaharajaG
I am a Christian. Jim Jones was a Christian. That should pretty much explain to you why you are wrong. - Reply to this comment
- MUSLIMS ARE VERY NICE PEOPLE. THEY ALWAYS SPREAD SO MUCH LOVE TO PEOPLE OF ALL RELIGION.
Tell me if I am wrong.
Where is the proof? Are the terrorists your proof? How many Muslim political and religious leaders condemn the terrorists? You are so wrong. - Reply to this comment
- Just curious, since she''s Indian, wouldn''t the correct term be amah instead of nanny?
- Reply to this comment
- I don''''t think they were killing babier. These outfits usually stop short of killing small children intentionally. Outside of the post Indian independence tragediy which ended with the partition of the country, the last time anyone intentionally targeted children, it was the English who did it.
Posted by summarex
Are you suggesting that they just kill their parents leaving babies without parents to love and raise them? Sad that the baby keeps aking for its mother and father. - Reply to this comment
- This woman is absolutely not coward at all. Like they said, she could have left and saved herself. She did a very brave thing going to save the child. If she would have tried helping the parents, assuming they might have been alive, theres still that chance her and the child would have both been killed. She did the right thing...
- Reply to this comment
- This woman is a true hero! She sacrificed her life to save a life! I am standing in awe! And for a moment i see history repeating its self, can anyone remember how a gentile woman saved Holy Moses from the sea as a baby in Egypt? This baby''s name is "Moshe" which is the Hebrew word for Moses.
- Reply to this comment




