Comments on: House Rejects $700B Bailout Plan

Bill Designed To Rescue Wall Street Is Shot Down, Sending Dow To Record Point Loss

Add a Comment See all 1586 Comments
by bks59 September 30, 2008 11:51 AM EDT
from Wickipedia:

The bills were introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA). The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. The final bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. This ''veto proof legislation'' was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999[1]

The banking industry had been seeking the repeal of Glass-Steagall since at least the 1980s. In 1987 the Congressional Research Service prepared a report which explored the case for preserving Glass-Steagall and the case against preserving the act.[2]

Reply to this comment
by gunfighter51 September 30, 2008 10:28 AM EDT
Liberals are worried about Palin becoming president, think about Pelosi, she''s next in line.
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman September 30, 2008 8:52 AM EDT
This whole bailout is a smoke screen. Watch the markets go up today.
Reply to this comment
by andrewsan-2009 September 30, 2008 8:40 AM EDT
Paulson Bernanke had hard neck to nail their colors to the mast based on continuation of years of guzzling at the trough. Obviously expecting Joe Public to roll over legs in the air. For years one of the consistent subjects in the locker room has been %u2013 %u201CWhere does the money actually go?%u201D No one was able to give a definitive answer but everyone had a good idea. But one consistent theme has been the desire to expose these despicable people and make them pay for it. One of them last week said the money went to loans arranged for Joe Public %u2013 yes, some truth in this but this is chicken****. So now an opportunity to nobble them %u2013 what should we do? %u2013 Hit them hard and start with P&B who are still trying to look a pair of innocents %u2013 and shouting at us at the same time! If they%u2019d started to evaluate the loans 3 months ago, now they would have a good idea of the risk. Don%u2019t pat Joe Public on the head and say %u2013 %u201CToo complex for you to understand%u201D - absolute rubbish. Actuaries and others do their work on educated assessments and this could be done with these loans, if the desire is there. But perpetuate the lie in order to bamboozle Joe Public and Congress! Loan assessments can be done based on standard risk assessment methods %u2013 not rocket science and we know that the answers would have a tolerance. If commitment is made that in 3 months we will have a reasonable idea of the problem, the markets would settle down.
Reply to this comment
by farkusa September 30, 2008 8:10 AM EDT
The END for UNCLE SAM as self-proclaimed Master of the World is near! BIG loser in morality in the world with all the rapes and tortures of innocent people around the world in the name of democracy (or OIL & MONEY$) ... Goodbye ..PERIOD
Reply to this comment
by upto1947 September 30, 2008 8:04 AM EDT
Thank God. I hope it never does pass.First thing the Republicans have done right.
Reply to this comment
by beej138 September 30, 2008 7:48 AM EDT
Of course, the reality is that the Democratic majority simply sees this as an opportunity to pay back their most ardent supporters and fund a far left agenda using taxpayer dollars. Through fear, they want to coerce Americans into agreeing to something we''d never accept on merit.

Funny, a proposal that started out three pages in length is now over 110 pages...and Democrats don''t want you to know what "fixes" they made. They simply want you to support it out of fear.

I don''t think so.

It''s SO important to get this done immediately that they went on break until Thursday...and no Democrats plan to hold public hearings or get the input of prominent, nonpartisan economists on what is supposedly the biggest financial crisis of our lifetime.

Apparently, Harry and Nancy think that 12% approval rating is for the Republican minority and not them.

Disgusting.

For the love of God, people...do whatever it takes to keep this party from controlling the House, Senate and White House. They can''t be trusted any more than the Republicans!
Reply to this comment
by brownpride46 September 30, 2008 7:34 AM EDT
The economy and stock market have tanked! But wait there''s more, Obama won''t [OR CAN''T] provide a Philadelphia court a certified copy of his ''original''long birth certificate. Obama isn''t eligible to be President?!

GOOGLE: BERG DISMISSAL OBAMA.

www.obamacrimes.com (A DEMOCRAT WEBSITE!)

A person [working for CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, MNBC, Washington Post, NY Times, etc.] may cause EVIL to others not only by actions but by INACTION, and in either case he [or she] is justly accountable to them for the INJURY. -John Stuart Mill
Reply to this comment
by brownpride46 September 30, 2008 7:28 AM EDT
Portfolio gone bust? Lost your lavish house? Couldn''t keep up with your lifestyle? Suck it up. Man up. We''ll survive and LEARN!

Don''t listen? Good!

Don''t GOOGLE: Berg dismissal Obama.

Don''t do your due diligence.
Don''t inform yourself.
Don''t vote.
Don''t question.

A person [working for CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, MNBC, Washington Post, NY Times, etc.] may cause EVIL to others not only by actions but by INACTION, and in either case he [or she] is justly accountable to them for the INJURY. -John Stuart Mill
Reply to this comment
by rascal2u September 30, 2008 7:27 AM EDT
WHAT IF $700 BILLION - ISN''T ENOUGH

This is probably just a down payment - you know they''ll soon be back asking us for more. Once we''ve started down that slippery slope we''ll soon find out that it''s really a much longer more dangerous fall than any of us expected. But by then it will be too late.
They''ve be able to fool us so many times before - so why not do it just once more before leaving office. That way they''ll ensure there is no money left for any progressive ideas like fixing Social Security or healthcare. The joke is on us. The bad guys have already extracted all of the money (and with special tax breaks too!), they just left us with all the debt to deal with. So why not give them the $700,000,000,000 so they can have a really good hard laugh on us before slipping out the door. You can tell your grandkids how %u201CThe No New Taxes%u201D boys boldly struck again and robbed American%u2019s future.
Reply to this comment
See all 1586 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (673 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Kennedy Center Honors Kennedy Center Honors

    Stars and Politicians Step Out to Honor Bruce Springsteen, Robert DeNiro, Mel Brooks and More

  • Return to Toyland Return to Toyland

    Behind The Scenes: Singer Emily Osment, The "Big" Piano and More From Inside FAO Schwarz

  • 2009 L.A. Car Show 2009 L.A. Car Show

    Concepts, Hybrids and Alt-Fuel Vehicles

  • Verdict In Italy Verdict In Italy

    American Amanda Knox and Italian ex-boyfriend Found Guilty in Murder of British Student

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    "Everybody's Fine" in New York; Plus, Matt Damon, Madonna and the Jonas Brothers

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: