Comments on: 7 Years Later, No Closer To Bin Laden

Al Qaeda Leader Proves Adept At Evading U.S. Tactics, Which Are Causing New Problems

[ofbyfor2]

Please notice that this report entitle "7 Years Later, No Closer To Bin Laden", the reporter failed to mention that it''''s "7 Years Later" and there has not been another attack since. Folks, no matter what you believe, the media you''''re listening to is one-sided.

Posted by j_o_md08 at 07:40 AM : Sep 11, 2008

Giving Bush credit for not having more attacks after 9-11 is preposterous.

The Bush administration, out of pride and arrogance, refused to take any action whatsoever on the report that the Clinton administration provided them, entitled ''Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.'' (gee, could the title have been any clearer?)

So they fell down on the job, paving the way for the terrorists to have a field day. After 9-11, they finally got their act together and began to do what they SHOULD HAVE DONE to begin with.

The point is, if they hadn''t been too arrogant and proud and had done what they should have been doing all along to begin with, 9-11 would NEVER have happened. You guys want to give him some kind of prize for doing what he should have been doing all along, yet fail to recognize that it happened on Bush''s watch, AFTER he had been warned! Pathetic!

If a business executive loses a number of major clients due to irresponsibility and negligence, you don''t give him an Employee of the Year award just because he fails to lose more. Get it?

[dredre2k]

Bin Laden died or was killed by the CIA many years ago. Neo conservatives didn''t want to find him because they needed an excuse to raise the "terror alert" when they had a new piece of legislation to push through, like the Patriot Act II.

Plus the real 9/11 culprits are here in this country.
Why does our VP claim that 19 hijackers attacked us, when several of those hijackers were found ALIVE http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm.

Hopefully one day, someone will be bold enough to uncover what really happened, but if America ever found out there''d be hell to pay for Bush & Co, and a lot of other people that helped attack this country.
www.911truth.org

[ofbyfor2]

Posted by aeasus at 07:30 AM : Sep 11, 2008

Do you seriously think that these are credible sources? Don''t you think it would benefit the Taliban and the Taliban-friendly Pakistanis to have us believe that Bin Laden is dead.

Talk about falling for a red herring!

[aeasus]

Please notice that this report entitle "7 Years Later, No Closer To Bin Laden", the reporter failed to mention that it''''s "7 Years Later" and there has not been another attack since. Folks, no matter what you believe, the media you''''re listening to is one-sided.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by j_o_md08 at 07:40 AM : Sep 11, 2008


anthrax attacks?? or did you forget?

neither attack has brought those guilty to justice by the Bush administration!!!

[sly_64]

It''s rather hard to find a dead man when they''ve already hidden the corpse. If he was alive or dead we wouldn''t know.

[mycomment1]

Why would the neocons want to catch him? He helps instil the fear needed to control the US people. As a saudi, like almost all the hijackers, he may even be a US agent ... seems strange how Saudi Arabia has never even been criticised (let alone invaded) over 9-11, and yet the evidence of their involvement is overwhelming.
Posted by tapsettle at 07:20 AM : Sep 11, 2008

Tokoyo Rose couldn''t have said it better!

[credibility2]

Unfortunately, the bin Laden element has attacked other US interests in other countries. Given the massive tragedy of our 9/11 attacks, our economy continues to wax and wane. Bin Laden''s intent was also to ruin the US economically. Bin Laden will probably never be found, but his heinous acts continue globally, including those that indirectly impact the US.

[nler1]

not so strange, he is an Saudi and they are looking in Afghanistan...
He is probally at home, in Saoudi Arabia, for him the savest place

[jtdev1]

Please notice that this report entitle "7 Years Later, No Closer To Bin Laden", the reporter failed to mention that it''''''''s "7 Years Later" and there has not been another attack since. Folks, no matter what you believe, the media you''''''''re listening to is one-sided.
--------------------------------------



I didn''t know there was an F''n Time table BinLadin follows you moron!

Maybe they just wanted to do one strike??? Ever think of that??? or do you know something more??? Should I send the CIA over to pull a rendition on you???

[petro49l]

Bin Laden funds terror activities all over the world. Al Qada deals street heroin for an extreme profit. The Coalition will never penetrate his underground sanctuary in Waziristan. The province is protected by Politicians in Islamabad who are paid by Al Qada. U.S. Special Forces Units sent into Waziristan are usually killed by Arab Mercenaries. George W. Bush will not attempt to capture an enemy who provides sufficient reason for the Saudis to raise the price for a barrel of oil.

[jtdev1]

It''s hard to find someone when YOUR NOT LOOKING!

[eclecticman1]

Please notice that this report entitle "7 Years Later, No Closer To Bin Laden", the reporter failed to mention that it''''s "7 Years Later" and there has not been another attack since. Folks, no matter what you believe, the media you''''re listening to is one-sided.
-------------------------------------------------------Please keep in mind, it was eight years between the first attack on the Towers and the second. The Bush adnministration has allowed Bin Laden the time to make his plans. There is no safety in that.

[eclecticman1]

The next administration needs to get us out of Iraq and concentrate on Afghanistan. It needs to carry the fight to Bin Laden and put him out of commission in any possible way. The Bush administration squandered this chance and McCain wants to continue its poor record. Vote Obama. Put intelligence back into the White House.

[j_o_md08]

Please notice that this report entitle "7 Years Later, No Closer To Bin Laden", the reporter failed to mention that it''s "7 Years Later" and there has not been another attack since. Folks, no matter what you believe, the media you''re listening to is one-sided.

[kohin-2009]

It is amazing how the neo-con spin machin is working.
Don`t they know that it was Bush/Cheney who helped a Saudi family to leave the USA on 9/11?
When the majority of the 9/11 suicides were know that they were saudi, did he tells the truth to the american people and the rest of the world ( surely that day the whold world was with our friends american people not Bush/Cheney) that he`s gona attack Saudi Arabia?
NO, instead, he tooks us into a country which has nothing to do with 9/11, distract the american armee to go after Bin laden in Afganistan , and where and what was he doing your Mcsame? Voting For Bush/Cheney policies who killed more than 4000 americans soldiers.
And now my friend, when other thinks are at stake, what they doing is divert our attention from Pallin (never in the history of the USA VP nominee has we seen not giving a press conference for so long )only the republican party can get away with that?
and when somebody else use the same "lipstick on a pigs" as Mcsame used before, it`s cry and outrage from the neo-con.

[sleepyric]

I think he''s been dead for years, and they just use him as a fear inducing icon...boogie man...BUT if he still is free, I''ll bet that drives Georgie nuts!

[liberalme]

Our country was paralyzed on 911, this while Bush was reading My Pet Goat, Cheney was orchestrating a "mock" attack and Daddy Bush was in a meeting in NY with Bin Ladens brother.

Bush stood with the American people vowing to "get" Bin Laden.

Troops were sent to Afganistan--the place Bin Laden was believed to be. Then something strange happened, Bush twisted intelligence and manufactured a war in Iraq telling the American people and the world Saddam had something to do with 911.

It certainly was bad enough we lost nearly 3000 people in the WTC--but Bush added hundreds of thousands more deaths including over 4000 precious lives of our brave troops.
Iraq is in shambles, over 600,000 dead and 2 million displaced and Bush holds to the statement that the Iraqis are "better off"..

No one is better off Mr. Bush--our country is no safer than it was on 911---the Iraqis are no better off, the families and friends of the lives list on 911 have been slapped in the face by you, Americans and America has been humiliated by you sir and the world no longer trust the one great country they depended on.

You Mr. Bush are a not a leader and no better than the terrorists that attacked us on 911.

[bluestardad]

BUSH SHUT DOWN THE UNIT LOOKING FOR BIN LADEN

CIA ARRESTED THE BOUNTY HUNTERS LOOKING FOR BIN LADEN

BIN LADEN IS A BUSH FAMILY FRIEND!