75 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Larkztongue says:
Why is this maggot infested midden of hyena feces keep getting airtime? "Andrew Breitbart is a racist, fascist, and a liar . This is like GW calling Barack a War Criminal.
CBS-please do not give this anal orifice anymore airtime to spread his hate!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Martha12345 says:
Now is the time to watch the Democrats and see what they are really made of. If Weiner stays, they will continued to viewed as a bunch of crooks (Same holds true for the Republicans). The public is sick of this type of behavior, regardless of party.

Do clowns like Weiner really represent the American people ? I think not.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rationall7 says:
If Weiner's wife is looking to trade-up she can tweet me "Big Wednesday" or "Afternoon Delight"
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Jaylah54 says:
Breitbart has already lost any credibility he had...if he ever had any.

It's rather pathetic to see him blithering away like this.

Yes, what Weiner did was unethical to the nth degree (and he should have resigned as soon as he got caught in his lie), but Breitbart would have been better served by publishing, and then shutting up, allowing Weiner to hang himself on his own. The way Breitbart's going on, he's just once again making his political bias and the fact that he's nothing more than a media ho excruciatingly obvious.
reply
Unsilent_Majority replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But why is that a problem for you? Breitbart doesn't claim to be some unbiased media personality. He makes no secret that he champions conservative causes and he also makes no secret that he is a grandstander.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dandydanmanoman says:
I remember when Matt Drudge came on the scene and the lamestream media tried to deligitimize him and predicted he was a passing fad. Years later Drudge is still around and the internet has spawned a billion new voices while it's the big media brands that are the endangered species.
reply
34sender replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The "big media brands" are not endangered species.

It's great that the media world is full of variant voices and not totally controlled by a few "giants"... but thinking the giants (owned by very, very wealthy CORPORATIONS) are in danger of being marginalized just shows your own lack of information.
pab44 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You must be listening to Sarah Palin since she coined the term "lamestream media" So many out there are simply haters of all things Liberal. Some are probably receiving Social Security, Medicaid, or even food stamps. Their kids are receiving school lunches. Maybe they have grandparents receiving Medicare. Consider this Liberal haters,if we have a complete GOP takeover, all of these safety nets will be gone yet you continue to buy into the usual Right Wing blather even copying Right Wing terminology like "Lamestream Media" or "Obamacare" You are probably feeling pretty powerless in your own lives which makes it easy for Right Wing politicians to exploit you by tapping into your frustration, rage to garner support for Conservative agendas. You are also very uninformed and the right wants you to stay that way. Of course haters are often revved up by the likes of Limbaugh, and Sean Hannity on Fox. Thus these low information Americans, pawns of the Right, are duped into voting against their own interests.Some will realize that they've been had but by then it will be too late.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
samXXkiley says:
coucou,

"""""And so he is actively trying to show that he is a reliable news source,""""
..............
Breitbart, le Julian Aasange des USA

................
Breitbart is america's Julian Assange
"au revoir
reply
vielmann replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
No he's not. He's just scum. He mostly creates his news and while it turns out he didn't create this one, it's right up his hypocritical alley. Notice that he hasn't gone after any immoral conservatives, and they've got plenty on their own plates.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
SHAWNP68 says:
It's kind of ironic since everything that comes out of Andrew Breitbart's mouth is a "limited version of the truth"
reply
Socialization replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
and you proof that Andrew limits the truth is????
34sender replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Proof:

ACORN edited videos. (proven in a court of law)

Shirley Sherrod edited video.

There's more, lots more.

Weiner did wrong, he lied about it. He apologized (even to Breitbart).

Going after him further is the devil's work.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
letsbehonesthere says:
Mr Weiner has to be really nice to Breitbart since Brietbart has full nudes of Mr Weiner also. He is not releasing them to protect Weiners family. (so far anyway)

This is the main reason Mr Weiner even apologized to Breitbart.

Breitbart has Weiner in his firm control right now.

The Liberal partisans are scrambling to change the subject, bring up other GOP scandals or anything possible.

Sorry...wont work. Weiner is toast, deservedly so.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
cambry1 says:
I don't understand congress people messing up like this. Once elected, they get all the money they want from the lobbyists from banks and corporations and free health insurance and pensions for life. This is how capitalism operates. The 2% that owns 95% of the wealth just buys congress people to pass laws to make it .5% own 99.5% of the wealth. Pretty soon it will be .01% of the population owning 99.999% of the wealth. Oh well, perhaps they will drop a crumb of bread now and again.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
josephp5 says:
The Wiener story is true, and he deserves to be embarrassed and humiliated.

But that doesn't excuse the fact that this Breibart guy is a professional Republican smear artist. Everything he says should be considered with this in mind.

It was Breibart that tried to smear Shirley Sherrod by editing up a video making it appear that she was saying something racist, when she was actually saying exactly the opposite.

Breibart makes his living attacking Democrats. But take a very similar recent case involving a married Republican Congressman who trolled dating sites with a shirtless photo, claiming to be a mere House staffer. Wasn't Chris Lee forced to resign over the scandal? Wasn't his NY 26th district just won by a Democrat in a special election to replace him? Where was Breibart on this scandal?

That's the thing about Breibart. Even if he picks a valid target like Weiner, he is still a huge hypocrite and completely biased.
reply
letsbehonesthere replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
The turth is all that matters.

Weiner is toast.
Unsilent_Majority replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
But the fact that Breibart is biased is really not an issue. He doesn't hold himself out as a regular member of the media. He holds himself out as a conservative blogger and by definition not an unbiased person.
ZoomieMSgt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Take off the blinders. The only reason there is a niche for Breitbart is that the lib media will never investigate things like this unless the congress-critter has an (R) behind his name. He gets the scoops that are brought to him by people who can't get them looked into by the MSM. If you can't understand this simple fact of life, you are nothing more than brainwashed, intentionally.
1/4