81 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mikey5050 says:
It's kind of ironic that the homosexual community is preaching about tollerance and freedom, while at the same time attacking Miss Prejean for exercising her rights and freedoms.

This is my problem with the leaders of the homosexual community. I do not hate gay people. I have a few gay friends and even relatives. But every time I offer an opinion different to that of the gay agenda, I'm labeled as a 'bigot' or 'nazi' or 'homophobe'. Tolerance doesn't mean I have to agree with you 100% of the time....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mikey5050 says:
So it's ok for this woman to pose nude and get breast implants, but it's not ok for miss prejean? What a hipocrite
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
perezflu says:
Maggie Rodrigues is so ugly in person inside and out. I'm surprised she has a job!
I met her and I wasn't impressed with her fake boobs and greasy hair. She made Carrie Prejean look like a SAINT! It was like watching beauty and the taco.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
perezflu says:
I wish this ugly Shanna would shut her mouth and stop being so jealous of Carrie and her beauty. Shanna you are washed out OLD and have a Fat face. Come on...you know you can't' hold a candle to Miss Carrie...that's why you are a quitter.
Get rid of that ugly necklace too. sick of seeing it.
Get a life and go watch your kids. Oh...kids? Yes, you forgot. You are a mother ....what kind is sad.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MrBag says:
I feel like that I am merely echoing the rest of you when I say that Miss Prejean was merely espousing what she believed in and exercising her Constitutional right of free speech. What's wrong with that?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
varacefan says:
Mrs. Moakler clearly has other issues which do not allow her to continue in her position. Those are her business and I don't think most care why she really quit. Maybe someday she will have the courage to be honest why she quit.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
beafrank says:
The '****' agenda has adopted what other fascist groups did to grow their cause, redefine and capture words to their advantage. First, they altered the meaning of the innocent word, 'gay' to promote that their 'sad' existence is actually a 'happy' one. Honestly, have you ever met a 'happy' person who flaunts the homosexual cause? The manner in which they treat each other within their cliques borders on harassment and sometimes is criminal. Then they altered meanings of other words, i.e, tea-bag, 'FFA' which commonly is known for a wonderful organization, Future Farmers of America, 'hate' is changed to mean to not agree with their agenda and finally 'marriage'. It does not help where they trick legislatures to construct 'hate-crime' legislation to push their agenda. BTW, by definition, there must exist a 'love-crime'. Can you cite a 'love'-crime'? I like how Chen offers her support to Moakler at the end of the segment. No media bias here. Moakler is a loser and is vying for a spot for next season's 'Girls Next Door'.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
de_dude says:
When talking about hate groups, maybe Ms. Moakler and others should look to the left for it is they that actually spew the hate. Freedom of Speech is one of the greatest rights that we have as citizens for it lets us all voice opposition to those issues that we do not agree with. All views should be respected and not attacked for if one attacks opposing views and those that present these opposing views, then we start to stray away from the principles that we have built our society upon, and look to adopt a different philosophy.

If there is anyone who is in the wrong here, it is Perez hilton, Ms. Moakler and anyone else who tries to silence opposing opinions. Maybe they should read the freedoms granted to all, and realize that they do not have a monopoly on this issue. Or are they afraid of the opposition.

Could it be that what PreJean opinioned is shared by a great percentage of Americans.. Maybe this is what they are afraid of ?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
beafrank says:
Everyone seems to forget that it was Mr. Lavandeira who inappropriately asked the 'gotcha' question to Miss Perjean with the intention of hijacking the pageant with his '****' agenda. He wanted to 'stick-it' to the contestant whose state citizens rejected the 'same-sex marriage' agenda by passing CA legislation, Proposition 8. After Miss California eloquently answered the question with a response similar to Obama, Biden and Hillary, the '****' contingent and their ilk launched a media war against her which the liberal mainstream supported with their 'squash a conservative' playbook digging for any negative item even if the source is fabricated, i.e., rumor, Photoshop, fragmented quotes, etc. Attached this circus to Trump's love of publicity and you almost have the perfect media storm. Fortunately, Trump made the only correct conclusion after milking it for over a week because it did conflict with the Apprentice final episode. Like most of the reality shows, the audience cannot stand the token 'GLADD' character on the show since most reveal how shallow, mean-spirited, narcissistic and 'un-gay' they are. As Perjean, correctly cited, you are basically free to adopt any lifestyle you want in the privacy of your lives. However, you do not have the freedom to trample other lives by trying to redefine religious terms with your perverted agenda and language.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sanity01-2009 says:
A gay rights supporter's (or really any liberal's) definition of a "hater" or a "hate group" is anyone who does not agree with them. If your opinion does not agree with their opinion, you are not entitled to your opinion. And strangely enough, they consider themselves tolerant and conservatives are intolerant.
reply
1/9